It reveals that extinction does not involve the removal of original learning, but the insertion of new learning. After extinction occurs, the response-outcome (R-O) and stimulus-outcome (S-O) remain intact. An example of the formation of the inhibitory S-R association during extinction is when pigeons receive discrimination training in which a response is reinforced with the presentation of food. When a light or a beeping noise was present, the pigeons would peck and get reinforced with food. They were trained so that no reinforcement in the presence of the stimuli would lead to frustration when extinction was introduced. When tested for extinction, a response during the stimulus with the extinguished response was less prevalent than in the alternate stimulus. This demonstrates that the procedure for extinction produces an inhibitory S-R association that corresponds to a specific stimulus and
It reveals that extinction does not involve the removal of original learning, but the insertion of new learning. After extinction occurs, the response-outcome (R-O) and stimulus-outcome (S-O) remain intact. An example of the formation of the inhibitory S-R association during extinction is when pigeons receive discrimination training in which a response is reinforced with the presentation of food. When a light or a beeping noise was present, the pigeons would peck and get reinforced with food. They were trained so that no reinforcement in the presence of the stimuli would lead to frustration when extinction was introduced. When tested for extinction, a response during the stimulus with the extinguished response was less prevalent than in the alternate stimulus. This demonstrates that the procedure for extinction produces an inhibitory S-R association that corresponds to a specific stimulus and