Explain How Effectively Does Representative Democracy Operate In The Uk

Improved Essays
How effectively does representative democracy operate in the UK

Democracy in the UK has many operative strengths claimed on its behalf. Proposed legislation in the UK can be processed through parliament very quickly due to no separation of powers, this is because there is a majority in the house of commons of the winning party members who can get their party whips to convince others to vote in a certain way in their favour. In 2001 when the Labour party had a majority in parliament of 165 seats, bills were passed more efficiently as almost the entire party voted for each legislation passed by the Labour party making the country in what Lord Hailsham would call an elective dictatorship.

Another example is Liberal Democracy, which is a type of representative democracy where there is an emphasis on the protection of individual rights and liberties, where the rule of law is
…show more content…
as it produces legitimacy in government. UK representatives are elected professionals who fairly represent the population. each constituency has an MP who won a majority vote to represent the constituents. MPs are less emotional when it comes to deciding on policies, for example MPs rejected the death penalty. furthermore the people are able to hold them accountable by removing them in future elections. for example the general election of 2010 withdrew legitimacy from Gordon browns labour government. Furthermore the uk parliamentary systems make it vital that members of the government can be made directly accountable to parliament and citizens. The government is constantly accountable to parliament as it must submit all proposals for law to parliament for approval. Also means that government ministers must report regularly to parliament. Overall parliament is held responsible or accountable to ordinary citizens at general elections whereby citizens have the choice to remove their MP and indirectly remove a governing party from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are some theories that the United Kingdom being involved in the European union restricts the idea of parliament sovereignty, this being that the fact parliament is no longer the supreme law maker, as they have to involve European laws into the United Kingdom so the fact that parliament didn't make the law goes against the quote 'What the Queen in Parliament enacts is law'. The British constitution can be summed up in eight words, "what the queen in parliament enacts is law". This means that parliament using the crown, enacts law what no other body can challenge. In A.V. Dicey main theory in the law of constitution 1885 ; witch is sometimes seen as an out dated theory being one hundred and…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States was founded on the basis of representative democracy. We vote officials into office that we trust to make legislation for the people. They do their best as leaders to take into account the wants and needs of the constituents. Although many people feel as if the use of direct democracy can help the constituents be happy and get what they want. However, the use of ballot initiatives are not the best option due to the fact that they will result in a mess in the American political system.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Ancient Principles and Teachings Influenced Western Democracy A democracy is a type of government in which the citizens elect their officials to represent them. The idea of democracy originated about twenty five hundred years ago in Athens. Western democracy has evolved throughout the years, but it is still influenced by ethical principles and philosophies from the Greeks and the Romans; along with Judeo/Christian teachings. Furthermore, western democracy was also influenced by Feudal England because during that period of time people first came up with the idea to limit the king’s power.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prime Minster Powers

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Parliament has the ability to remove the prime minister, but this is usually very rare for parliament to go to that extent. The House of Lords can challenge the prime minister over legislations that may not fit well with them and parliament in general. Proving checks and balances, similar to the public, they can monitor the prime minster voice concerns and debate against the prime minister when nothing could be resolved in the Commons. Although, Blair did get defeated any times in Lords over legislations, yet he was almost victorious in the Commons. This may seem like a good thing for the prime minister, and in this case for Tony Blair, but the defeat in Lords indicated that there were tension within parliament over Blair and his use of powers.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the decision makers are elected by the society, it could be assumed that they are the “wisest” and will make it more difficult for vicious policies to take effect, especially in a larger society. Today, the U.S does hold a representative democracy. Through the election of congress, the president, and other officials, U.S citizens are utilizing Madison’s ideals from Federalist…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It has been established by our Founding Fathers that the nation is to run on a government in which the power of the officials is limited and subject to the say of the people. A guarantee of this principle is the form of government in which America holds today. Although the system is seemingly ideal, it can develop deep cracks that root to problems and controversy over power and constitutionality. The operations of interest groups, political parties, and election campaigns play large factors into whether or not this form of government succeeds or fails. These are the stems that connect the work of the government to the people and how citizens contribute to policy and are fueled by the standards of democracy.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Perils Of Presidentialism

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In “The Perils of Presidentialism”, Juan Linz asserts that presidential democracies are more likely to fail than parliamentarian systems due to their inherent conflicting natures. Meanwhile, in parliamentary democracies such as the United Kingdom, prime ministers are elected by coalitions and although coalitions are based off multiple parties and divergent ideas they still have to give up certain concessions to form the majority. This calls for a smoother process while processing legislation. Moreover, when the prime minister loses the favor of the parliamentary majority, the parties must negotiate the terms for a new coalition and chamber.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However according to the democracy theory elections can be a flawed process which means not everyone gets what they want. We vote for politicians because we want our problems to be solved. These problems include: providing better education, finding better jobs, increasing salaries, reducing taxes, and lowering the prices of homes. Politicians know that in order for them to be elected, they have to make promises to the public so they have a reason to vote for them. Once they get elected, they realize that their job is not so easy because they have to go around pleasing people.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Dahl On Democracy

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In modern thought, democracy is considered as the ideal form of governance; it is a tool to usher in freedom and progress to citizens of a state. While the term “democracy” is used liberally to describe a wide array of governing systems, it is assumed that most “democratic” governments share similar principles that highlight individual freedoms. Robert Dahl, in On Democracy, makes his case for the democratic system. Dahl argues throughout the book that democracy should not just be viewed as desirable; democracy is the most viable governing option for the modern state. Therefore, achieving the highest levels of democratization ought to be the goal of all governments that are considered democracies.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Direct Democracy Dbq

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Athenian government was a direct democracy, meaning the citizens of the city-state had a say in the decisions they made. Although the government was based on direct democracy, only adult males could vote. The Athenians had the power to change anything in their government due to having direct democracy. This could take a turn at any time since it was a direct democracy, which could lead to some people cheating the vote. In Athens, they valued the individual over the group.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essentially there needs to be one power in charge in order to make sure nobody is getting special treatment from Parliament.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a major advantage to the Prime Minister as it essentially allows for them to appoint those who will be loyal and support their decisions throughout their time in office. Therefore it is argued that the “British government embodies a system not of formally codified rules but instead advice”2 and relates to the Prime Minister being surrounded by 'Yes ' men who simply agree and advise rather than argue and debate. As a result, this allows the Prime Minister to push their political agenda forward with little opposition as those in the cabinet are usually in favour or loyal to their decision. To embody this sense of power further, the Prime Minister can drop cabinet members who are not in favour of their decision from the cabinet entirely3 increasing their political standing by replacing them with someone more in favour. Theoretically, cabinet members can debate against points made by the Prime Minister, however this is very unlikely due to having a sense of loyalty after being appointed by them.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, in a representative democracy citizens are the ones who choose upon which laws they want to enforce. This can be very dangerous, because the majority of the citizens may not have a strong educational background when it comes to choosing between what laws they want to implement. In addition, most citizens tend to choose laws based on the situation at hand, and do not take into consideration the effects their choices have on the…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays