Why Is The United Kingdom's Unwritten Constitution

Improved Essays
The United Kingdom is referred to having an unwritten constitution, but that is not strictly true. This may not refer in one single text, such as Germany or USA, but large parts are written down with much of it in the laws passed in parliament, these are called constitutional statue. According to Lord Justice Laws in the case Thoburn v Sunderland City Council this is an act witch either the conditions the legal relationship between the individual and the state in some way or enlarges or diminishes the scope of fundamental constitutional rights. Examples of constitutional statue are; Magna Carta 1297 , The Bill Of Rights 1689 and The Human Rights Act 1998 . Parliament sovereignty is one the core principles in the United Kingdom constitution. The supreme legal authority in the United Kingdom is in the hands of the parliament. In the traditional view of parliament is …show more content…
There are some theories that the United Kingdom being involved in the European union restricts the idea of parliament sovereignty, this being that the fact parliament is no longer the supreme law maker, as they have to involve European laws into the United Kingdom so the fact that parliament didn't make the law goes against the quote 'What the Queen in Parliament enacts is law'.
The British constitution can be summed up in eight words, "what the queen in parliament enacts is law". This means that parliament using the crown, enacts law what no other body can challenge. In A.V. Dicey main theory in the law of constitution 1885 ; witch is sometimes seen as an out dated theory being one hundred and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    War. Battles are not always fought with guns and blood, it can be a fight for different ideas, necessity and equality, which can be seen through Canada’s history. Canada has continues to positively impact issues concerning human rights and equality on an international scale from the early 1900s to the present day by setting a good example for other countries to follow. Some significant events such as the Battle of Vimy Ridge, the Person’s Case and bringing home the constitution and the charter of rights prove this to be true. There are many battles that could demonstrate Canada fighting for human rights, but the Battle of Vimy Ridge explicitly portrays how important it is.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution is a basic guideline of rights and duties bestow to the citizens in which the country is governed. The Framers of the Constitution created a system in which it limits government is that they were afraid that of tyranny. They were afraid that the government was too powerful. And in the wrong hands, the government could be easily abused. By limiting the government, nobody would no longer fear the wrath of tyranny.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    constitution is supreme law. The constitution liberates with the highest of authority of the people. It gives power to the government and also gives the government limits to protect U.S. citizens. There are three major parts to the constitution. The three parts are the preamble, the seven articles, and the amendments.…

    • 2272 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What was once “regarded as the mixture of law, custom, conventions of governance and institutions existing at any one moment” were instead “charters creating institutions that would henceforth act under the authority they bestowed.” Under this view, constitutions were now the law of the land, even placing it above the highest official in the government. Because of this, any law enacted by the government had to fall under the guidelines of the Constitution, and if the law were to fall outside the guidelines, it could be deemed unconstitutional. In “Four Letters Interesting Subjects”, the author attempts to define the word constitution. The author states that constitutions serve two main purposes: 1) to decide what the form of government should be and 2) what powers should the government have.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    As Boyd (2015) explains, constitutional law is special in that it cannot be subjected to alteration through “the mere passage of new law through the House of Commons and the Senate” (p. 98). On the surface, this fact appears to guarantee respect for the authority of the rights laid out in the Constitution. This is significant because constitutional law supposedly, in the words of Cheffins and Tucker (as cited in Boyd, 2015), is a “mirror reflecting the national soul” (p. 98). However, many reject the claim that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [hereinafter, Charter] has brought about greater respect for fundamental rights and freedoms.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Infringement of Rights in the Colonies The American Revolution must be viewed as much more than the want for separation from the mother country. Parliament not only disregards the fact that the colonies should live and abide by the same laws and liberties within the realms of England, but treats the colonies as if they are much less than what they are. The hunger for power in England ultimately ensued the end of their rule in the colonies.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout of history we have had many leaders, laws, disagreements, and war. The British are an example of whom the Americans have had disagreements with and have been at war against. From going to war the American leaders have learned to realize what they believe is best for the colonies. From these previous events Thomas Jefferson with the help of other leaders they created the Declaration of Independence. The rights of Englishmen included: Magna Carta, evolution of Parliament, common law precedents, and the bill of rights in 1869.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Deference

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction This paper is based on varied literature including journal articles, research papers, online resources, edited books, etc. The main focus of this paper is to examine the UK courts procedure in relation to the concept of deference with regards section 3 and section 4 of the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998, it’s limitations and the essence of judicial deference to legislation and the interference of Parliamentary supremacy. In addition, it would be potent to highlight ‘the judicial approach to the scheme of the HRA particularly the interpretation and application of the interpretive obligation laid down in s 3 and the power to declare legislation incompatible under s4 as well as the construction by the judiciary of a principle of deference’…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The UK did not believe it was necessary to develop a written constitution. The “laws of a constitutional nature are in fact written down in Acts of Parliament or the law reports of court judgments” (Bogdanor, n.d.). The government of the UK believed that any major event will cause for the constitution to be changed. Although the UK does not have a written constitution, it does have rules of importance, which are contained in statutes and law reports. By not having a written constitution the United Kingdom has several advantages to the constitution and their rules.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Human Rights Act (HRA) is argued to be a fundamental instrument in the United Kingdom’s (UK) constitution. It allows the rights and freedoms of the individual to be protected from the state within Domestic Courts. The Act has been under h scrutiny for decades surrounding the conflicts that it poses on the UK’s unwritten constitution and the fundamental doctrines of Parliamentary sovereignty, Separation of Powers and the Rule of Law. Due to this, there have been proposals made by many political parties over the years to abolish the HRA and replace it with a British Bill of Rights (BBOR). However, the Act has become entrenched in the UK’s legal system even prior to the enactment of HRA in 2000, highlighting the issues that would be posed…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Delegated legislation (also known as secondary legislation) have many benefits with regards to passing Laws. Due to the sheer volume of Laws that need passing in England, leaving The Houses of Parliament unable to meet with the demands, thus the allowance of a second party to pass an Act (through the parenting/enabling act), both the House of Commons and the House of Lords can continue with their ever-changing workload. Made up of two separate houses, The Houses of Parliament consist of; the House of Commons, and the House of Lords. 650 majoritarian elected individuals known as ‘Members of Parliament’ (or MPs for short), make up the House of Commons, and each MP represents a constituency, such as Conservative party member Karen Bradley who represents Leek.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The implication of this statement is that Parliament may only act within the powers conferred on it by law. Theorists have long debated the meaning of the rule of law. Some advocate a ‘formal’ or ‘procedural’ conception of the rule of law according to which, a law depends for its validity on such things as clarity, certainty, prospectivity and generality (see, for example, Raz or Fuller). Other theorists have advocated a ‘substantive’ conception of the rule of law according to which a law depends for its validity on certain substantive rights and principles (see, for example, Dworkin or…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Section 40 of the Act sets out that the Supreme Court is the superior court of record and will assume the jurisdiction of the House of Lords in judicial…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays