Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

Superior Essays
Ethnic discrimination and racism in the United States have been problematic for hundreds of years, well before colonization. However, slavery shaped a far greater problem with racism in the United States. Slavery in the United States began in the 1600’s when the first African American slaves were brought over to Jamestown, Virginia to assist with the production of the cash crop, tobacco. Later in 1793, Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, which led to a greater necessity for slave labor to support the South’s economy. In 1857, Dred Scott v. Sanford was a Supreme Court Case that was an indirect catalyst to the Civil War and arguably a poor Court decision in U.S. history, in regards to racial relations in the United States. Before the end of …show more content…
Sanford case is believed to be an indirect catalyst that propelled the United States into a Civil War. The war started in 1861 when seven southern slavery states, which later grew, declared their withdrawal from the United States and became the Confederate States of America. Slavery and the expansion of slavery westward were the primary causes of the Civil War that took more lives than other war in the history of the United States. Understanding this, President Abraham Lincoln created and delivered an executive order, the Emancipation Proclamation. The executive order was delivered on January 1, 1863. The proclamation announced, "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free." However, the Emancipation Proclamation was limited in many ways. For example, it only applied to the states that had seceded from the Union, leaving slavery unaffected in the Border States. Besides, it also exempted parts of the Confederacy that had already come under Northern control. President Lincoln created the Emancipation Proclamation to benefit the union’s war effort against the Confederacy. In fact, the freedom promised in the proclamation depended on upon the union’s victory. Lincoln knew that the citizens had been negatively affected by the war and many just wanted the war to end. Lincoln sold the idea of the Emancipation Proclamation to be the end of the war. Consequently, the Emancipation Proclamation captured the …show more content…
Within a year, the rights for African Americans once again changed when the Fifteenth Amendment was passed. The Fifteenth Amendment states that U.S. citizens shall not be denied or abridged their right to vote on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. One year later, in 1870, Congress passed the Force Acts to protect the rights promised by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Act read, “If any person, by force, bribery, threats, intimidation, or other unlawful means, shall hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, any citizen from doing any act required to be done to qualify him to vote or from voting at any election as aforesaid …”. For this reason, the Force Acts banned groups, such as the KKK. Still, African-Americans soon saw their rights are taken away because of literacy tests, poll taxes, and other discriminatory measures. Thus, further smoke screens that Congress created to keep African Americans from having equal rights because of various fears, specifically in the South

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    First, the Dred Scott decision empowered proslavery Southerners. The 1854 Dred Scott v. Standford case was brought all the way to Supreme Court and was regarding a slave who lived in an area illegal to slavery because of the Missouri Compromise and was suing Standford for freedom (Brands 2015, 323). This case caused controversy; Firstly, because slaves could not be citizens at the time therefore they should not be allowed to sue a citizen.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    March 6, 1875 a court verdict that will preside in infamy, the verdict of the Dred Scott versus John Sandford Supreme Court case. Dred Scott, a once enslaved African-American man who then moved with his wife to Illinois, a free state or one in which slavery is illegal. By virtue of not being allowed to purchase land undeterred by the fact that under state legislation he was a free man, Dred Scott attempted to sue in a federal court. The chief justice in this case was Chief Justice Roger B Taney, a Federalist white man. He was also born and raised in a slaveholding household, obviously one that was against the freedom of negroes in America.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Free soil” gave many immigrants the opportunity to thrive without having to compete with slave plantation owners who, at the end of the day, had more profit than “small, free farms”. This awareness of equality that the Scott v. Sandford decision kindled also allowed new court cases to form, dealing with issues of slavery. For instance, the Strauder v. West Virginia case, eight years later after the Dred Scott decision, dealt with black jurors being rejected from participating in…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Supreme Court rulings such as in the Dred Scott case, the North and South fought numerous times over slavery. The North feared the many potential consequences of this case. The South was reluctant to give up slavery for various reasons. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case set precedent for other cases with similar conflicts. This case also provided reasons for the Civil War to occur between the North and South.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Case Essay

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Dred Scott case was a very important time in United States history, politics, and American Law. In the 1800’s, unlike the northern part of the country, southern states underwent slavery. The Dred Scott case was a case that dealt specifically with slavery; the case began with a slave wanting freedom for he and his family. Like most slaves Dred Scott was born into slavery, in 1799 and didn’t get out until Emancipation Day.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Emancipation Proclamation gave the Union the moral high ground, an increase in relations with European powers, and a potentially large new segment of manpower ripe for recruitment” (Whitenton, 2012). The white people in the north saw the goal of abolition as wildly unpopular as very small numbers had strong feelings in support of the idea. The northerners were in a similar opinion as the southerners when it came to the issue of the blacks or the slaves. They were not ready to lose their manpower and a lot of tension was created initially as the union supporters disagreed with the new goal of the war. To help ease the tension in the North Lincoln recruited more blacks into the Union army where they were to assume roles of a free man.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD: THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS Jay Barber 25938654 HIUS-221 November 16, 2017 As seminal decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sanford brought the issues of racism and slavery to the forefront of American political culture during the nineteenth century. It has also been considered by legal and political scholars to be a “ghastly error”, the “product of an overly ideological and reactionary judge”, and a cause of the Civil War. Many abolitionists and Northerners declared the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegitimate while others demanded obedience to the Court’s decision and labeled disobedience as rebellion, treason, and unconstitutional.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the slaves who would later be freed returned to similar lifestyles proving that Lincoln issued the proclamation as a way of weakening the force of the Confederacy. Lincoln could also be argued to not be a Great Emancipator due to his views of freed slaves. One was him being a supporter of colonization of freed slaves. Lincoln may have supported the freedom of slaves, but he also believed that a multiracial nation would be worse off as he describes his ideas on colonization “that neither races nor individuals shall have suffered by the change, it will indeed be a glorious consummation.” (Eulogy of Henry Clay)…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Case

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Without the Dred Scott case, there would have been no proponent the rights of blacks. This case “came to symbolize the high point of racism in American law, but it also helped lead to the adoption of the fourteenth amendment, which has been the fountainhead of racial equality in the twentieth century.” The Dred Scott case and…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reconstruction era after the Civil War lasted began in 1865 and lasted approximately twelve years, it was long and tiring but brought much change in many areas. Reconstruction was ultimately run by the Radical Republicans in the U.S. Congress. This itself brought controversy and trials with President Johnson who had received office after Lincoln 's assassination. Johnson was followed by Presidents Ulysses S. Grant and Rutherford B. Hayes, these presidents actions also adding stress to the reconstruction. While the federal government was fighting corruption in the North, the Ex-Confederate leaders were slowly making their way back into the southern government, something that everyone in the Union had decided was unacceptable upon Southern…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, the congress established some tests to see if they were able to vote, and also the black community was threaten, congress said they were going to put some criminal penalties if black people tried to vote. Years later all these things were banned and all the black communities could vote without doing any of the previous…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    New political forces in the South gave way for new changes. During reconstruction, African Americans made huge political gains. They voted in large numbers and were also elected to political office. African Americans were elected as sheriffs, mayors, legislators, Congressmen, and Senators. Even thought their participation was significant, it was exaggerated by white southerners angry at the Black Republicans governments.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Voting Right

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Is voting a right or a privilege?” That question came to my mind, when I was thinking about human rights. I think it is ethical to say that voting is a right for everyone because everyone should have the right to choose their leaders regardless if you are a felony or not. In the past only rich and powerful people were able to vote, however as of today everyone that lives in the United States that are citizen over the age of 18 now has the right to vote. As Michelle Alexander gives examples in her book The New Jim Crow how African American don 't get to vote due to the color of their skin.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays