Ethical Relativism Is Not True Essay

Improved Essays
Kathleen,

I agree that ethical relativism is not true because although we can accept differences in moral, cultural norms, practices, and beliefs, there is still a stronghold in my mind that morality can hold some of these beliefs and practices morally wrong. From my research and reading ethical relativism is a theory that is relative to the norms of one’s culture and fluctuates right from wrong on an individual and group level. This is the deciding factor between cultures actions and whether it is held right or wrong depending on the moral norms of the society. For example, in some countries beheading someone for certain crimes is acceptable when beheading in other countries is not acceptable and considered murder no matter the cause or reasoning. Just as in history specifically when regarding how the Jews were treated inside Nazi concentration camps was justified in the eyes of the Nazi society and would view their actions as ethical when this would be truly an ethical
…show more content…
If there is ethical relativism then there are no clear ethical absolutes that would have universal lists of moral rules to be followed and if there were ethical absolutes then it would apply to everyone, not just most people. This is the main argument against ethical relativism that worldwide moral standards can occur even if cultures display differing moral practices and beliefs. What may be common sense to one could be seen completely different from others. This again brings up morality and holding some beliefs and practices morally wrong just as the ethical absolute example related to the Nazi’s treatment of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism In Sports

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The rest of the problems with moral relativism is that no matter what anyone’s views are they can’t be seen as wrong. Its viewed as an opinion of we approve or disapprove. This is because of the way cultural relativism and subjectivism is set up. It may appeal to people but it allows everyone to be right in their own eyes. Moral progress is also a problem because a person’s deepest beliefs can be true by definition, in result they…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Stace presents the relativists standards in his writing, you can only believe in ethical relativism if you deny the values of an ethical absolutist, and vice versa. Both sides describe “moral standards”, but in two different definitions. For the relativist, the word “standard” is used to subjectively describe the morals of a person at the very moment in question. The relativist would say that it doesn’t matter whether the person thought it was morally right or wrong, because there is but 1 universal moral “standard”. A genuine relativist believes that what one person may think is right, is right even if it goes against what the majority has decided to be right or wrong.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism acts as a sort of scapegoat and allows both of these viewpoints to be correct. However, the problem arises when the law of non-contradiction enters into the equation. The law of non-contradiction, as it applies to ethics, basically dictates that no act can be both moral and…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the most part, I believe Americans would like to make decisions based on moral absolutism as that seems to be right decision to make, but in all reality, guidance is based on moral relativism due to so many variables that take place today. Ruth Benedict discusses in A Defense of Ethical Relativism what various cultures viewed as a moral absolutism in a particular part of the world but may be seen as moral relativism in another part. Benedict discussed homosexuality as being accepted in the American Indian tribe years ago but one would have never thought it possible when thinking about the era of cowboys and Indians as they portrayed a very masculine image. The Northwest Coast civilization’s known practice was when an individual was killed,…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the first major problem that moral relativism poses for ethics would be that people could abuse it and use it as an excuse for some of the decisions that they make. Perhaps, they are doing something that is seen as immortal to majority of cultures, but they claim that it is moral because they have seen in other cultures that it is morally accepted because it fits the beliefs and or customs that a certain may have. Another issue that may pose a problem for ethics would be that moral relativism leads to absurd conclusion, and changes our ability to deliberate straight and make certain opinions about moral or ethical issues. If there is absolutely no moral law than there is no foundation for…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with ethical relativism because we already have it and if we reject ethical relativism then who will have to power to say what's right and wrong for all societies. If we reject ethical relativism then history will repeat itself with a person who will get the power to implement what's right and wrong without any say from…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in cultural relativism it is normally all the members of that certain culture who decides on what is morally acceptable. Perhaps this is why Thomas (2014) believed that, moral beliefs within a culture are true or false depending on whether they accord with the prevailing believes in that culture. However, I believe that both theories are related to a certain extent. For instance, we are all born belonging to a certain culture, community, or society.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Madelyn Raska PHIL 2306-032: Ethics Prof. Linda Cox February 2, 2018 Ethical Relativism Paper: Is Morality Always Relative? Rachels states that "every standard is culture-bound". (Rachels 140)…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we follow that, then it is impossible for us to say any culture’s ethical beliefs are better or worse than any other. Think about that if we live in 200 years ago when slavery still exist, relativist would believe that the slavery is the right thing since it is believed by most of people at that time. While, we know that slavery no longer exist in our country now, and we do think that is an improvement compare to what we did before. However, there are still some parts of world that slavery still exist; and according to relativism we cannot find any moral position to criticize them since whatever their culture believes should be considered right. However, it would be irrational and absurd to think there is no morally difference between slavery and freedom.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays