Aristotle Being An Animal Analysis

Improved Essays
In Aristotle’s view, everything in this world can be categorized. Living beings include plants and animal. The plant has nutritive soul and the animal process both nutritive soul and perceptive soul. If we discuss animal further, we can divide animal into rational animal, which is human, and non-rational animal.

The essential feature of “being an animal” is perception. From the Aristotle Introductory Reading: “413b2: What makes something an animal is primarily perception.” Perception is the ability to see, hear or become aware of something through senses. From the Aristotle Introductory Reading, “(Chapter 5, 416b32). Perception occurs by us being moved and affected.” Plants don 't have perception since they are static and they
…show more content…
Plants, animals and human are all living beings but rock is not. Even though you don 't feed rock, after hundreds years, it still will be rock. If you don 't feed animal, it will die. Nutritional soul is indispensible for all living beings and it is the soul shared with animal, plants and human. Furthermore, perception soul is only for animals. For example, touch is the basic kind of perception. Animals can touch but plants cannot. Perception also includes response in a pacific way correspond to something from outside. If you pet a dog, it will respond in its way. If you touch a plant, plants cannot respond at all. Human has a rational soul, which divide them from general animals. Human has intellect, mind and ability of thinking but animal don 't. All in all, if we want to organize the whole living-beings, “world of in-animal things” is on the bottom, and then “plants,” “animal.” The “rational animal” is on the top of the whole diagram cause human has three …show more content…
Aristotle asks “what” question and Heidegger asks “who” and “How” question. First comes to Aristotle. He is trying categorized everything in the world. What he do is that he asks a “what” question first, and he keep asking more until he gets the fundamental answer. He believes everything has an essence. The essence can separate one item from all of others. For example, the essence of human is rational. He categorized human as rational animal above non-rational animal, plants, and other living beings. (Book VII.102814): “The primary being is the what-it-is, which signifies substance.” Aristotle did not explore “being” much since “what” question cannot fully explore “being”. Heidegger concentrated on the most fundamental philosophy question, the question of being. He asked questions about human being, which he called Dasein (being there). Heidegger’s questions helps us evaluate the way we live and exist and he is a pioneer in this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 2010 at SeaWorld Orlando, Dawn Brancheau was brutally attacked by a SeaWorld orca named Tilikum. Blackfish is about Tilikum the orca and his conditions at SeaWorld and others left in captivity for years. Aristotle’s notion of proof was used in this documentary through logos being very informative of the mistreatment of the orcas. Next, they use pathos through the trainers sharing emotional details and interviews of the victim’s family. Lastly, they used ethos by having people that actually worked there share facts, and having video footage to back up what they stated.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reply to Objection 1: Parmenides, your notion of being is too strong. When it comes to the definition of being you provided, the idea that being cannot change is incorrect. Being can change while remaining the same, so the notion of something coming to be or passing away with change, would be incorrect, as I have stated in my response and given examples. Through potential and matter, nothing is coming to be or passing away, because it is still the same substance throughout. The form of the substance always had the potential to become the change, so nothing is coming to be and the substance is not passing away, but rather staying the same.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill were two famous philosophers known for their studies in politics. Aristotle believes the best form of government is a polis, while Mill believes a more laid back structure is better. He believes the people should be ruled by the harm principles. Although they have very different ideas on how the people should be ruled, there are many similarities between the two. Aristotle was a great philosopher from the BC era.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now that Heidegger has established one can encounter the nothing through anxiety, one may analyze more deeply a response to the question “what is the nothing” and also to the connection between the manifestation of nothing in anxiety and beings as a whole. However first, it is important to note that though one can encounter the nothing through anxiety, we are not able to willfully experience the nothing. Additionally, anxiety reveals the nothing, but does not control it. Moreover, just because we’re not always anxious, doesn’t mean its presence isn’t felt. We are constantly exposed to this withdrawal and slipping away, of being faced with our finitude and the causing of entities to lose their significance.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reason is not necessarily the means to the better life, or towards procuring ‘the good,’ from the view of these latter thinkers. It seems that Nietzsche would problematize the allegory of the den, in this respect, to no end. From a Nietzschean perspective, the relativity of our values, and the ways they merely reflect the power dynamics and social and political undercurrents of our age, begs the question of their effect on our reason (Nietzsche, 1989, p.46-47). The supposed ‘good’ or ‘moral worth’ of philosophical inquiry, implied by Plato in the allegory of the den, is something that Nietzsche would have to challenge.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hailey Williams, Hailey Rapheal, Cierra Brooks Literacy I (Wednesday 2:00pm-4:30pm) Buddy Assignment/ First Grade Science Standards GLE 0107.1.1 Recognize that living things have parts that work together. GLE 0107.3.1 Recognize that plants and animals are living things that grow and change over time Literacy Standards 1.RL.KID.1…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Question of Origin In Hinduism, life started by Lord Brahma; creator of the universe, Vishnu; sustains creation, and Shiva; destroyer of all evil. These three Gods are behind the creation and destruction of the world. Brahma created human life from different parts of his body and his soul. It is their belief that everything in the universe was already here and that God is part of that.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unlike his mentor Plato, Aristotle believed that the essence of all beings is Substance. Substance is the first principle of all things, according to Aristotle (VII, 1). The philosopher defines substance as that which cannot be predicated, but that “of which all else is predicated” (VII, 3). Everything else, such as matter, qualities of the matter, and etc., proceed substance. And in order to come to these conclusions about the essence of the world, Aristotle uses the methods of scientific inquiry, experimentation, and deductive reasoning.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle explicitly argues that when understanding our primary functions as “rational animals” is followed by applying it in life, it leads to achieving fulfillment and intrinsic happiness (Aristotle, 349 BC). However, Aristotle’s disillusionment on the understanding our human function does not prove to be stable basis in the realistic application of his philosophical views. Tackling this topic will be done by drawing a similarity between Aristotle’s ideologies about the contemplation of rational beings, with Hannah Arendt’s thoughts about the primacy of the contemplative life. The objective will be to prove that the active life is superior and is an essential requirement to the contemplative life; which then proves the impracticality of achieving…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle takes it that bodies (more specifically, natural bodies), which are taken to have life in them, are generally considered substances (Aristotle 412a12-14). More strictly speaking, a body that has life in it is a substance in the third sense—they body is a compound (Aristotle 412a15). Here one might immediately question how or why it is that Aristotle’s distinction between substance as matter and form, and even more so how potentiality and actuality could apply to body and soul, in order to characterize living beings as the third composite understanding of substance. Granted, one the face of it, the application seems a bit implausible.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To a certain extent, Aristotle is similar in his philosophy to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, but now completely. He also believes in a universal good in order to achieve happiness in life. According to Aristotle, mortality and good is understood in terms of a whole life. Contrary to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, that understand moral obligation in terms of human individual actions, instead of examining a whole lifetime. According to Aristotle “good” can be found in many forms.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that both body and soul are parts of human nature. The soul is the total of the operations of human beings. Aristotle tries to explain his understanding between body and soul using an analogy of an axe. He explained that the body would be metal and wood.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now in order to address and explore the question about the meaning of being, Heidegger argues that it requires that being for whom the sense of Being and Being itself matters. This conceptual access to the question of Being can only be possible through an examination of the being of the particular kind of entity that is the human being, a human structure, which he calls Dasein. The concept of Dasein is fundamental and crucial for Heidegger’s project in Being and Time and for existential philosophy in general. More broadly, and in the context of traditional German philosophy, Dasein denotes being, existence. However, Heidegger uses Dasein in a narrower way so that to describe the particular experience of being that applies to the modes of the…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Aristotle’s function argument is to determine the function of the human being, in order to identify the true human good. The role of the argument in Aristotle’s investigation is to eliminate typical natures belonging to living species and determine the characteristic that is most unique to human life, which is ration. Then stating how human function is an activity of the soul, Aristotle uses his elimination method to state that in order for the human function to be performed well, that it must act in accordance with ration. It is useful to understand the concept of function as it applies to human beings because without it, we would not understand how it connects with our virtues and human good. Virtues, as Aristotle describes them, are best when they are complete and self-sufficient because we are pursuing them for no other reasons but themselves.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Onion Cell Experiment

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction: LAB REPORT- Comparing and Discovering the Properties of Animal and Plant Cells INTRODUCTION: Scientists have developed classification units among livings. One of this classification types is kingdoms. It represents widely covered societies, including Animalia and Plantae. It is known that all livings are composed of cells, from the cell theory, so animals and plants also have a cell association.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays