Finally, human error and DNA contamination is a huge concern for ALL free individual’s DNA. Eric Lander in 1990 founded a new center for Genome research at Whitehead, as well as, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Eric Lander has been an expert advisor for the defense on many cases. From Lander’s first hand personal experiences as an expert witness on various court cases, he felt compelled to express his observations of the flaws with DNA fingerprinting identification. Lander’s stated, (1989)…
Let’s begin with the killing of Los Angeles Police Department officer Kevin Gaines. He was shot by undercover officer frank Lyga. Lyga was involved in a road rage incident with Gaines and suspected him of being a gang member. After his untimely death it came to be known that on his off duty time he worked as a security guard. It also came to light that this was not his first road rage case where he would threaten drives with a gun.…
A coroner is someone who examines dead bodies and sees what caused that person to die. Some interesting things about the Grundy County Coroner, (John W. Callahan) is that he examines the fingerprints and x-rays of the dead body and he looks at the DNA records with the fingerprints and he takes all of this to the law agencies to see what they can do with it to see how they actually died. First, John Callahan when he works on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week getting calls at his office for Union Street in Morris, IL to go examine or look at dead bodies. When he goes into business, he looks at the wounds, clothing and personal effects of that person and takes many x-rays of the body to see how or what was the cause of the bodies death, than he ships…
In the article titled “The CSI effect at university: forensic science students’ television viewing and perceptions of ethical issues one quote was that “Most students believed that the programs gave an unrealistic representation of the profession to the public; yet students were also able to identify positive elements for recruitment and education purposes (pp.381).” In this article, it states how they did some research on the CSI Effect. They held a study which took place in New South Wales, Australia at a large university that last between March to May 2011. Most participants indicated that the depiction of science on television was inaccurate and unrealistic. Wise (2010) concurred, “The CSI Effect, whether real, or imagined, is impacting upon the NSW criminal justice system, and criminal justice systems around the world.…
In a homicide investigation, there are many factors which may impact the likelihood of a successful case. In order for a suspect to be convicted on trial, investigative processes must be followed that involve several imperative elements. However, sometimes these procedures aren’t followed and it is in these circumstances that major errors and flaws in the inquiry process are exhibited. It is then due to this that recommendations and frameworks must be created in order to avoid such weaknesses in future cases. Although, sometimes extrinsic factors, such as the influence of the media, may also impact the outcomes of such cases.…
Implications from wrongful convictions cause greater harm among the society in which the offense happened. Law enforcement and criminal justice agencies suffer burdens of errors with correcting errors that were caused toward the legal processes. Wrongful convictions according to Mark Handler are the most serious of all miscarriages of justice. (p. 30) Due to the fact that individuals should not be put through the complications of being incarcerated for crimes they did not commit.…
The discipline of forensic science has been under fire for quite some time now, and one can say that it is completely justified. Fraudulent and incompetent analysts, such as Annie Dookhan, have performed investigations in flawed crime labs, like that of the Baltimore crime lab, and through this process, have imprisoned the innocent, just as Cameron T. Willingham was falsely convicted. Issues occurred in all of these instances that allowed for the devaluing of the field of forensic science. If a lab is faulty or fraudulent, it is likely for the analysts who work within it to be flawed as well, as the two are essentially a team.…
Introduction: After further investigation of the crime scene, large glass pieces were found on the floor of the utility closet which appeared to come from the lower part of the window in the same room. The glass appears to have been broken from the outside, but there is know for sure without further investigation. The evidence can be found by identifying the type of glass and then reconstructing the glass window so that the radial fracture can be examined to determine the point of original impact. Materials: The materials used are listed below: -A flashlight emitting UV light -The glass fragments on the floor -The window pane in which the glass appears to be from -Gloves -Magnifying…
According to a survey conducted by the Ecology Global Network, in the article “Birth and Death Rates,” it sates on average, 151,600 people die each day. In addition, an article by The American Transplant Foundation, titled “Facts and Myths,” states that at minimum, 21 people out of 123,000 men, women and children on the organ transplant list join the death rate every day. Incidentally, a single person can donate their body and save up to 8 lives. Thus if 20,000 of the 151,600 deceased donated their body, less people in need of a transplant would die. Instead, out of 151,600 deaths only a little over 8,500 deceased were donated.…
Death is something many people fear. It can come when you least expect it, in a blink of an eye. It is a way of life and no one can prevent from happening. In Edgar Allan Poe’s short story The Facts In The Case of M. Valdemar, published in December of 1845 the readers see how symbolic death is in this story; the readers can also see how mesmerism plays a role in the stopping of death, and how the main character M. Valdemar has a man vs. man conflict.…
Aaron Cole November 20, 2017 Professor Brozgal Paper 2 Murder in Memoriam: Discovery of Truth Taking influence on real historical events, Didier Daeninckx’s prize winning second novel—Murder in Memoriam—crafts the widely known historic reality of the Holocaust with the overlooked tragedy known as the massacre of Algerians on the 17th of October in 1961. The two events are expertly crafted to create a world of universal truth at last acknowledged. Tying these histories together by use of characters, presentation of unknown truth, as well as applying agency to three points of views, Daeninckx works to legitimize the lesser-known events of the Algerians to fully realize the literary purpose of Murder in Memoriam.…
1. What is your thesis statement? Innocent individuals have been wrongfully convicted for crimes that they did not commit. This has happened in the past, before DNA technology was available, however, it continues to happen today. Some people have spent several months behind bars, while others have spent decades behind bars, all while being innocent.…
Have you ever thought if a criminal could be falsely? Perhaps not, you would think the judges or police would have good evidence to contradict the criminal. Well there's a law, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the accused is the only logical person who could have done the crime even if hard evidence is lacking. On January 13, 1999 Hae Min Lee a senior at Woodlawn high school had disappeared. Right after school she was suppose to pick up her cousin, who was in kindergarten but never showed up.…
Homicide is the killing of a human being by another human being. In old common law, the only type of homicide recognized was murder. Today, U.S. law makes many distinctions between each type of homicide, classifying them as justifiable, excusable, or criminal, and gives varying degrees of seriousness to each type. Where criminal homicide is concerned, it can further be broken down into murder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide. Each subset of criminal homicide has several elements and characteristics that distinguish one from another.…
No evidence exists to show that viewing crime dramas causes jurors to value forensic evidence over eyewitness testimony; if anything, eyewitness testimony instead bolsters weak forensic evidence, supported by the fact weak or circumstantial forensic evidence did not affect juror behavior when coupled with eyewitness testimony. If anything, the public must simply be informed about the actual functions and capabilities of forensic investigators. Shows like CSI commonly overrepresent the capabilities of forensic investigators, and these selfsame shows are the most popular representation of forensic practices the public has access to (Cole and Dioso-Villa, 2009). If the prosecution worries about the potential negatives of the “CSI effect,” they can bring in an expert in forensics to testify about the discipline’s true capabilities.…