Ernest Van Den Haag Death Penalty

Decent Essays
According to the article "The Death Penalty Debate" by Ernest Van den Haag, the author confirms that the death penalty is not a new law, and humans do not put this law by themselves. But, most of traditional laws and scriptures support the idea of the death penalty. Also, the history does not mention that people who have the authority to put the death penalty in their regulations. Now, the society should apply the law because it is difficult to allocate this law for the God only. "I see no evidence for society somehow not having "the right” to execute murderers. It has always done so. Traditional laws and Scriptures have always supported the death penalty. I know of no reasoning, even in a religious (theocratic) state, that denies the right

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty isn’t a product of modern thought, in fact; it has existed ever since the first civilizations. Therefore it might be considered as a barbaric feat that we would’ve gotten rid of, nevertheless in America the majority of the states are still actively putting convicts on death row for the crimes they’ve committed. Even though it is unethical to take someone’s life, it is for the greater purpose. Some might argue that it is immoral and…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Van den Haag’s response was that the distribution of the death penalty does not change its morality. ”no distribution cannot affect the quality of what is distributed.” If the death penalty was misdistributed then it would “actually favor African American murders over white murders, because the misdistribution Is explain by the race of the victim, and murders tend to kill people that are the same race as them.” Misdistribution is irrelevant when it come to those who deserve it. People that deserve the punishment will get it because it is not about equality it is about justice being served.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernest Van Den Haag begins his article asking if the death penalty deters more than life in prison. Haag says that even though life in prison is unpleasant, it is still very different from taking the life of a person. He says that 99% of people on the death row would rather be in life sentence (Pg,392 right column). I think anyone would prefer to stay alive, but isn’t a life sentence just like the end of a persons life? They will be confined to a cell for the rest of their life.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment or the death penalty, has been used in the United States since the country’s founding in 1776. Back then, executions were performed publically throughout towns, and have been controversial from the beginning. I find the death penalty to be an extremely arbitrary and primitive act that should not be practiced anymore. We are at an advanced time in society and the U.S. is the only english speaking country to still practice this cruel and unusual act.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, not everyone agree to impose the death penalty and there are the rest that are strictly against it. Furthermore, some would be for the death penalty giving that it was created to: deter people from crime, a punishment that fits the crime of murder, as well as to protect the society from individuals that behaves in such manner. On the flip side of that would be the people that are not for the death penalty. They concerns are valid likewise to those whom are for it. In fact some feel as though the death penalty is inhumane, unfair, only makes the murder rate increase (Schmalleger, & Smykla, 2014).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around for many years. It has been a controversial argument in the American society. According to the Webster Dictionary death penalty means the decision by a court of law that the punishment for someone’s crime will be death (Webster Dictionary). Over the years people have wondered many times what is the death penalty is, how this punishment works, and who qualify to receive such punishment. Many people are unaware of this social problem; it could be for many reasons.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernest van den Haag, “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense of Capital Punishment” (Analyzing Moral Issues, 234-238 in the 6th Ed.) Ernest van den Haag idea for government role was “securing rights and duties by specifying them through laws and enforcing the laws.” Haag argues that capital punishment is morally permissible on the arguments of retribution rather than deterrence it can be clearly reflected in his work. Ernest also addresses the idea of justice, and deterrence. Ernest van den Haag main point was, if the government should not only have the right to punish but to also enforce more extreme laws.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Death Penalty

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I do not believe that society has any right to decide if a person lives to see another day. However, I do not support the criminals and their actions. Of course, what they did was wrong, but I have always been taught that two wrongs do not make a right. It is known that more than two countries a year, on average, have abolished The Death Penalty completely. In 1999, ninety-eight people were killed in 20 states.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Very few countries similar to the United States employ the death penalty as punishment for murder. The list of other countries that also apply the death penalty includes China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Needless to say, we are not keeping good company when it comes to the practice. Support for the death penalty became popular during the 1990’s, when crime was on the rise and politicians, in an effort to appear tough on crime, embraced policies such as the three-strike rule and minimum sentencing. Since that time, however, the political climate has changed, and the death penalty has frequently come under fire from both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Idiot, Fyodor Dostoevsky discloses his views of capital punishment through the portrayal of his character Myshkin. Dostoevsky makes several remarks about the apparent cruelty of the death penalty, typically through the lens of this character. “I believe that to execute a man for murder is to punish him immeasurably more dreadfully than is equivalent to his crime. A murder by sentence is far more dreadful than a murder committed by a criminal. The man who is attacked by robbers at night, in a dark wood, or anywhere, undoubtedly hopes and hopes that he may yet escape until the very moment of his death . .…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays