Karl Marx Private Property Analysis

Good Essays
Private property is the defining characteristic of capitalism. Marxism and Liberalism are significantly different political ideologies. For this reason, it is a surprising to discover, when comparing and contrasting these philosophies, Marx and Mill are able to agree on certain facets of private property. Both philosophies believe that private ownership of production and property creates an unstable but expanding economy. Simply put, they agree that private property creates a class who achieves concentrated wealth, and a working class that is burden with struggles. However, their opinions depart from one another on how they view the effects of private property on society. Mill conveys that private property is primarily a liberating and beneficial …show more content…
Further, he does not deny the plausibility of communism if it were administered gradually and on a small scale (Mill275-279). A pivotal point of Mill’s perspective on private property is that personal ownership of land is what stimulates capitalist competition (Mill 253). This competition leads to lower prices of commodities, which actually leaves more surplus to pay wages of workers (Mill 253). This is a divergence from the Marx perspective that competition actually increases worker suffering. Furthermore, Mill is willing to admit that capitalism can at times depress wages, but he qualifies that remark by espousing that all wage declines mirror market fluctuations but competition will eventually revamp workers’ wages (Mill 249, 256). A large portion of Mills’ argument for private property is constructed when contrasting capitalism to the schematics of communist property. Mill asserts numerous facets that he defines as lacking in communism. First of all, managers of private property have motive, incentive, and a large stake in producing as efficiently as possible (Mill 262-263). Additionally, Mill notes that a transformation to altruistic form of shared property would be a challenging endeavor to establish universal conformity to a new economy, and that transformation in …show more content…
He thinks that maintaining private property is more liberating than the Marxist proposal for shared property. Without individual property the economy lacks incentive, motivation, as well as expert managers. These two features of private property spur completion, which creates economic growth. Furthermore, he sees a revolution as more chaotic then any cyclical chaos capitalism produces. Also in relation to the communist view point, Mill understands attacks on private property as overstating flaws or misunderstanding the economy. Simply put, according to Mill private property is the most liberating political ideology available and is already the accepted form of economy spanning a significant portion of the globe, so justification of revolution and transformation to an unknown is a more dangerous concept than it is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    (Marx, 1867) Ironically, while capitalism flourished, the conditions of the Proletariats deteriorated (Boyer, 1998). This became what Marx and Engels called the “base/superstructure” model. For them, the foundation of society was its economy while “culture and ideology are constructed to help secure the dominance of ruling social groups” (Kellner, 2005). Marx believed that the feudal society of Capitalism caused the rigid stability of human existence. As he puts it succinctly: “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past” (1852).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Created by ideas that reflected the awareness of the early industrial revolution in the UK and later on Europe. Marxists believe that societies experience struggle due to inequalities like wealth, value and power. Marxism contains different views but have common policies which include. Production is to produce great benefits for a minority at the expense of the exploited majority who are the poorer class. Meaning that it exploits the labour of its employees by paying them wages lesser value than the selling value of the item.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalism can cause huge distance between the classes which can result in social uneasiness, while Socialism systems attempts to assure social equality. In the matter of technology both systems share the interest in scientific and technological developments, but differ in the methods. While in capitalism, the classic laissez-faire allows the private sector to develop technology and encourage entrepreneurship that consequently allow creative destruction, while in socialism the government agencies would be exclusively behind every project. The highest representation of the opposition between the two systems, was the during the Cold War, when two powerful nations, The United States representing capitalism and the U.S.S.R representing a form of…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Defenders of the regime of rights plausibly argue that it encourages ‘bourgeois virtues’, without which everyone in the world would be worse off” (454). In a system, where capital determines your power, the proletariat will not have an equal opportunity in the free market. The social theorist, Polanyi, also agrees with Harvey. He believed markets lacking social control could be destructive and were unrealistic (Polanyi-Levitt 4). Polanyi believed humans are naturally “social and cooperative rather than individualistic and competitive” (14).…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jerry Muller talks about how inequality is increasing in a capitalism system due, to the bourgeoisie ruling the free market (Muller). Although, it creates a strong and advanced market it can create inequalities for the working class. However, he goes on by saying that the people have the power to elect the government officials to help address the problem. A capitalist democracy system can help solve these inequalities, but it is up to the people to fix it. As we have discussed there are several negative affects about capitalism, but is socialism better?…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx said that capitalism would make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Von Mises disagrees with almost everything Marx had to say and he would emerge as a defender of the capitalist system. Mises saw how capitalism affected society…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Globalization, a social transformation that provides cheapest labor and resources for capitalists in order to minimize their costs, seemed emerging as a good strategy for capitalists. However, it may cause "underconsumption" because low wages on labor undermine the desire of buying from people. Hence, the market will be destablized and the capitalists may not make enough profits. Eventually, this cycle will remain inefficient. Since the capitalism is the dominant idea in the world, Karl Marx remained his idea and argument on capitalism in his work, called…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In recent times, there is a growing concern of wealth inequality in America. This has really drawn criticism and challenge to capitalism as the model of socioeconomic structure. Debates surrounding this issue are often traditionally addressed through two models: communism and capitalism. Karl Marx, in his work, “The Communist Manifesto,” criticizes capitalism for it’s preaching of individualism and competition, which leads to the exploitation of the working class thus resulting in further antagonization between socioeconomic classes. Marx ends his criticism by offering up the complete abandonment of the capitalist system in favor of a communistic system in which socioeconomic autonomy is in the hands of the state.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first reason why socialism benefits society more than capitalism is because of the intense wealth inequalities that occur in capitalistic societies. For example, The Unites States is the poster child for capitalism, yet is…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If firms preferred liquidity over long term investment, this then shows how insufficient demand reveals the vulnerability of Say’s Law. 3. Karl Marx’s theories of capitalism most intrigued me because he dissects Adam Smith’s theory for capitalism and presented the several contradictions of capitalism. He came from a different time period than Smith; he saw the class struggles and the capitalist society setting as something that is not ideal. Even though the standard of living increased thanks to capitalism, Marx witnessed laborers always tried to make ends meet.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays