Dred Scott V. Sandford Case

Decent Essays
Xander Kanalos
Coach Blount
4th Period
14 March 2018
Dred Scott v. Sandford,1857
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case was the most impactful in the supreme court and in general to everything that is constitutional. The case called for a man who was a slave that sued for freedom in their state which was Missouri(slave state). This case was important to African Americans and the United States because of the laws that were put in place after this case.
This case was important because of what it accomplished for the States and the constitution. This case made the 14th amendment come into place which was full citizenship for African Americans. The case had to do with a guy named Dred Scott and John F.A. Sandford and it was discussed from February 11,
…show more content…
To add to that, the case was about a slave getting his freedom for him and his family ,and with that he goes to court in Louisiana and Missouri and tries to get freedom.This case was about an african american which was a slave that was fighting for his rights and freedom. He was with his owner in a free state and was able to sue him and take him to court to get his freedom and they declined his case the first time then they redicussed it. To add to that, it was passed through March and this sparked the civil war because of the free states letting the slaves be free unlike the south which thrived off slaves off their plantation. Dred was with his owner and they moved to alabama and when his owner gave up on farming his owner settled in missouri and sold dred to U.S. army surgeon and he took him to illinois which was a free state due to the Northwestern Ordinance which prohibited slavery in certain states. Which meant Dred was a free man because his owner to him to a Free state. Dred ended up moving with emerson to minnesota and got married with Harriet Robinson and the ceremony was taken care of by the owner. Which normally the marriages were not of any importance and didn't need a ceremony to be official. “In 1837, the army ordered Emerson to Jefferson Barracks

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court Case of Reed v. Reed, 1971, The Extent of Equal Rights, two parents sought the ownership of their deceased sons estate. Richard Lynn Reed was still a minot when he passed without a will addressing which of his possessions would go to whom, both of his parents, Cecil and Sally Reed, made advances to claim their adoptive sons land. Both Cecil and Sally filed applications to become the administrator of the estate to the Idaho court, who then held a joint hearing for them. The court came to the conclusion that the Richards father, Cecil, would be granted administrator because the Idaho law dictated that “if several persons who are equally entitled to administer an estate file a petition, ‘males must be preferred to females. ’”(Supreme…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Case Summary

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dred Scott and his wife was a slave of an army surgeon, John Emerson, after Dr. Emerson bought him from the Peter Blow family of St. Louis. Scott accompanied his owner during Dr. Emerson’s duty at Illinois, Wisconsin and back to Missouri in 1838. Later when Dr. Emerson died in 1846, Dred Scott and his wife, with the help from John R. Anderson, the minister of the Second African Baptist Church, filed petitions in the Circuit Court of St. Louis for their freedom. According to State Historical Society of Missouri on the article, “Dred Scott Case”, it was the Blow family that help him sue against Emerson’s widow for his liberty. They argued that Scott’s living in Illinois and Wisconsin, two free states according to the Missouri Compromise, with…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For instance, the Dred Scott VS Sanford supreme court case and the Plessy VS Ferguson case. These cases were important in making this country free for all races as it is now. Without such cases to sort out right/wrongdoings who would know where we would be today. In 1846, Dred Scott, a slave, sued in a Missouri court for his freedom from his master.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The ruling of the case said that no African-American had rights and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Many of the northern states denounced the law which led to the formation of the Republican party. Historians believe that the ruling of this case was the biggest mistake that the Supreme Court ever made. If it was not for Dred Scott’s perseverance and motivation for the issue of freedom and citizenship for African - Americans the issue may have never come up. Even though Dred Scott and his family did not receive their freedom from this case, they did keep their family together through the case, which was unheard of during this time.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Legend Thurgood Marshall was born in Baltimore , Maryland on July 2, 1908. When it comes to his parents, his mother who goes by the name of Norma was a kindergarten teacher. His father William Marshall was the grandson of a slave, and he worked as a steward in an exclusive club. An interesting fact about William Marshall was that he liked to listen to cases at their local courthouse and come back home and discuss the lawyer 's point of view with his sons. When thurgood was asked about why he’d gotten so intrigued into law he often turned to mention the heated arguments him his father and brother used to have over any topic.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dread Scott is making a statement about American imperialism, through the image of South Korean students burning the flag, Dread is giving us a different viewpoint of how America is viewed in different regions of the world. By giving the audience a chance to participate, to voice their opinions only through treading on a symbol of compulsory nationalistic pride (the flag), we are put in a position where we can begin to imagine the viewpoint of people from around the world whop don't hold any favorable opinion of American exceptionalism. That being said I would write in the book. Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man, involved in the Supreme court case Dred Scott vs. Stanford, in which the Supreme Court decided that African Americans…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The African slaves as a party in the case attracted many people especially those who supported the abolition of slavery. Moreover, the case led to the transformation of the courts…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Powell v. Alabama case of 1932 was a fundamental case for its time. This case happened at the height of Segregation between African Americans and the whites in America. The case involved nine African American boys in the South that jumped on an empty freight train heading to Alabama. A group of young white men jumped the train as well sometime throughout the night. The two parties eventually met up, where then a fight happened between them.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juvenile Justice History

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Juvenile Justice System has been around for quite a while. There were even forms of a justice system before the actual system was set in place. A juvenile is a male or female that is under the age of eighteen years old. The history of the system has great importance to how the system has become today. There have been many changes made and new acts and programs introduced to better support the juveniles well-being.…

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays