Does Stoics Make Life Better?

Improved Essays
Stoics don’t see philosophy in the way we see it today. They see it as a way of life, but for them philosophy is not about the past or even about knowledge it is a way of life. They define philosophy as a kind of practice or exercise concerning what is beneficial. What can make life better? How can it become better? Once we come to know the value of the world and nature we transforms, a sort of self-transformation. The Stoics have God is a corporeal Entity. The one who created it all and to the fine detail. The Stoic God is identified with one of the principles of the universe which is eternal reason. Everything has a plan and goes on accordingly. It all begins with fire and going through change but finally ending up with fire at the end, becoming …show more content…
The universe is a spirit in the stoic’s eyes and because of it they can agree with Aristotle in the concept of empty space. Out of nothing not can come (Parmenides) The Passive elements water and earth. The active ones being Fire and Air, the pneuma (spirit) is the main cause of all exists growth and guidance. What keeps an object from falling apart? The pneuma. The pneuma has two motions in the body an inward one that makes things connected and the outward motion which gives qualities to the body. These qualities can be set up in four categories. The first is the pneuma of inanimate objects which is called tenor (holding). The second category is the spirit of the plants which goes by the name Physique (nature). The Stoics see Physique (plant spirit, Nature) as functions of humans. For example Eating, Drinking, Growing etc. The Three category is the animal and it is called soul .The fourth and final category is the rational animal which commands. The Animal qualities are seen as impulses or desires that function due to the rational and commanding. For us today these Stoic monistic concepts of the human soul have serious problems for us. For us the sense of impressions are due to the spirit quality of the rational animal, commanding faculty, but in a mature animal impressions become thoughts. Within the rational animal's spirit there is another thing doing something and the stoics call it assent. Which means …show more content…
These are divided into two the rhetoric and dialectic. Due to these divides we have what is know as the middle law, which states that either things are true or false in logic. Stoics believe that all things happen through antecedent cause. Meaning that things are caused by events or a thing that existed before. Cronus makes statements of the past being a requirement. He gets us think about it by saying that nothing has the power to change the past. Which may seem a bit weird, but he tries to make things clear by follin up with another statement that nothing impossible follows from what is possible. Meaning what we are capable of will never be impossible. Our actions are done due to our character which means we take responsibility for them. The Stoics found the perfect excuse for things that happen outside your control, and it’s that the causes and effects do not flow through my beliefs and desires. Tripping and dropping someone's coffee. It isn’t your fault because, hopefully, your desire wasn’t for that to happen. The is an equal balance between the ignorant and the wise in the Stoics definition of knowledge.(SEP, Logic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Stoics’ claimed that the natural world exhibits a rational order that can be explained by appeal to existence and operations of power of reason, which they called Logos. Logos is defined as God, or reason, intelligence or mind. They believe that God, along with the soul/mind consists as a separate entity than the physical body. The stoics defined logos as entity in the universe that’s based on just mind and intellect. Stoics believe logo as an intangible object, entity of the universe.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the poem, "From the Dao de jing", the pictures in this poem pass on the possibility of the Dao as a unity of opposites are the: bowls, carts, windows and doors. Every one of these pictures demonstrate its immense and puzzling inventive potential. "A clay bowl is molded; but the use of the bowl will depend on the part of the bowl that is void (jing line 7). " The items that are made are relying upon the part that is void. The void speaks to an entire hollow space where potential "usefulness rises.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, Epictetus’s Enchiridion is the way stricter than Christianity. Epictetus is a Greek stoic philosopher who was born as a slave. However, since he got a great chance to study stoic philosophy under Musonius Rufus, he became free from the slave. He later even established a school in Nicopolis in Epirus(Brown). Like Jesus, Epictetus wrote nothing, but his teaching wrote down and published by his disciples in The Enchiridion.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One similarity between Buddhism and Stoicism is both focus on the importance of mindfulness. In Buddhism "awareness begins with remembering what we tend to forget" (Batchelor 58). In Stoicism "...reflection... will make us appreciate how wonderful it is that we are alive and have the opportunity to fill this day with activity" (Irvine 71). Once we become mindful of what's presented to us in that moment we have a more positive outlook of life. Because, we took the time to embrace whose and what's in front of us.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Letters to Herodotus, Epicurus’ material outlook assumes that all things are made out of atoms, an argument that he extends to the soul. He raises the point that the soul is material and capable of sensation, and these sensations build out thoughts; however, this assumption tends to categorize human thoughts and limit originality and creativity. In the text, Epicurus explains that the soul is a structure that is material and primarily used for sensation; these sensations become responsible for our thoughts and reason. The soul’s relationship to the body is important in this respect.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living By Epictetus Essay

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophers have pondered the meaning of life for millennia. Some say that the meaning of life is to find happiness, or to flourish. But what is happiness? A stoic named Epictetus goes into great detail to explain how one should find happiness. In theory, living by Epictetus’ guidelines of only worrying about things you can control would be worth it and make you flourish; however, it is impossible to do so because human nature causes us to focus on things that are out of our control.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of focusing on the negatives in life, Marcus Aurelius says that people should accept what has happened, and move on with their lives. This is a Stoich viewpoint. Stoics are very matter-of-fact people. Stoicism, as defined by Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is “indifference to pleasure or pain.” Instead on focusing why something is happening to himself, the Stoich takes what is given to him, and continues his journey in life.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the good life? Many philosophers believe that they know what a good life is, what it consists of and how the good life can be reached. Lucretius, a Roman philosopher who followed the idea of Epicureanism, believed that simple pleasures and avoiding pain is happiness which leads to the good life opposed to Epictetus, a Greek philosopher who followed the idea of Stoicism, believed that one should never desire or seek pleasure whatsoever. Although Epicureanism may sound similar to Epictetus, the founder of this system of philosophy was actually Epicurus, who was Lucretius' role model. His philosophy "proposed that the ultimate goal of human life was happiness, and that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Apraxia Objection in Academic Skepticism The apraxia objection is o The thesis of suspension of assent on all matters (henceforth the thesis of suspension) 1. The Inactivity Objection The inactivity objection is an argument put forward by Stoics against the possibility and the convenience of suspension of assent on all matters.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    So, according to Epicurus, religion only instills fear and pain obstructing them of happiness. In broad sense, Epicurus was a hedonist. He believed that the pleasure is the highest good. But Epicurean hedonism was a little different than just vulgar hedonism.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I will be comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness, and using these theories and views, examining if bodily and external goods are necessary to happiness, and to be able to back up why it either is or is not necessary. The two had many similarities, and differences that can be expanded. The Stoics believed our happiness was based off one thing entirely, and that is virtues. Aristotle breaks down how happiness is the highest possible good.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays