Living By Epictetus Essay

Improved Essays
Show More
Philosophers have pondered the meaning of life for millennia. Some say that the meaning of life is to find happiness, or to flourish. But what is happiness? A stoic named Epictetus goes into great detail to explain how one should find happiness. In theory, living by Epictetus’ guidelines of only worrying about things you can control would be worth it and make you flourish; however, it is impossible to do so because human nature causes us to focus on things that are out of our control. Epictetus describes being truly happy as being free (Epictetus 1). To become free, you must give up on anything that is out of your control like body, fame, or power (Epictetus 1, 2, 24). Humans have no control over what happens to their bodies; if we are born …show more content…
Some of Epictetus’ advice is sound and would benefit a lot of people if it were followed, but I personally do not think that it can be followed. When someone close to us dies, it is only natural to mourn that person’s death. When someone mocks you, we feel hurt and embarrassed. To flourish in my opinion is to be completely stress free, but also living as a human being. Epictetus makes it seem like the only way to have a flourishing life is basically to become a robot that feels no emotion. Feeling no emotion would separate you from all external things, but how does that really make you happy. According to him, a perfect life would be to live in complete isolation away from all things, only taking in what you need to survive, and contemplating your own thoughts and ideas. I believe a great deal of human interaction is required for you to have a flourishing life. I would much rather know the pain of losing a loved one instead of instantly letting them go. I would also like to judge external things and feel sorry for myself when something bad happens to me. It all goes back to being human. Epictetus wants to cut off part of your brain in order to live a happy life, but if that were the way the god(s) wanted life to work then why wouldn’t they make us like

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Are People Right Or Are We Are Free
    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Are People Right Or Are We Are Free

    Even though some dreams people may have sound crazy, insane, or impossible as long as they try that is all that matters. If they do not succeed that is perfectly fine, at least they can say that they tried and have a smile on their face. Society may tell someone that they cannot, sometimes it seems like that is just society’s job, but their harsh words have nothing on them so long as they give whatever their dream is their best shot. Dreams should never be limited or stopped, they should be conquered or at least the thing that keeps a poor soul continuing to live. Henry could be categorized as an idealist because of the fact that he believed in focusing on mental and spiritual factors and denied that material evidence is everything.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurean Argument On Death And Harm
    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Epicurean Argument On Death And Harm

    After all, no one can come back from being dead to describe it. The energy of people is limited. If you wastes overmuch unnecessary energy with the problem which will never settle, you will miss the happiness which you already hold in your hand. If all the theory does not have any evidence to prove, why not choose the easiest one for you? Hence the other objection come up with the opinion that the easiest and comfortable way is if you certainly believe the world after death is a prefect happy world for example heaven, you will still good.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Corruption In Saint Thomas More's Utopia
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Corruption In Saint Thomas More's Utopia

    One thing for a society like Utopia to work would need to include no selfishness, greed, or anything of the such. Ideally, everything would be perfect because everybody has everything, but the concept of corruption would ruin the chances of such from getting far. People would want to cheat the system by taking the easy route and leave hard work for others. The innovation for new ideas and technology would be declined as there is no incentive to improve or make higher quality items as everybody gets anything they would want. The process of transforming to this lifestyle would require much dedication and most likely a fresh start due to people’s formed values, opinions, and greediness.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mustapha Mond Character Analysis
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mustapha Mond Character Analysis

    Through the contrast in these beliefs, it becomes clearer that controlling the populace via technology is a dangerous game, with the elimination of old culture playing a central role. John can see the lack of challenge that comes from this ideology, which is incredibly harmful to the people as they never experience a true challenge. Without being challenged, they have no way to know both their own capabilities as to what more they could accomplish, which is perfect for the government as there is no worry of multiple people challenging the existing infrastructure. While this is beneficial to the constancy of the…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Rossum's Universal Robots: Dignified And Meaningful Work
    • 1277 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rossum's Universal Robots: Dignified And Meaningful Work

    Dignified and Meaningful Work It is not uncommon to hear people complain about having to work in order to be successful in life. In theory, the thought of not having to work for anything sounds great. However, looking deeply into the fundamentals behind the idea, it is easy to see that such an initiative could never be accomplished. Karel Ĉapek discusses the idea of creating robots to do the work in place of humans in his 1921 play entitled R.U.R., an acronym for Rossum’s Universal Robots. Ĉapek’s views regarding the role of work in humanity are told through Alquist, a wise, old man who believes work is a very important defining factor of humanity.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Pessimism By Schopenhauer
    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of Pessimism By Schopenhauer

    Living life intellectually may be the best way to live without suffering but most of us live for our desires. The happiest way to live is to fulfil our desires. To live with intellect would be to live without emotions. It would almost make us like robots. In today’s society where robots could very well be created to live as humans.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nozick: Pleasure Is Our Sole Aim In Life
    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nozick: Pleasure Is Our Sole Aim In Life

    Now, people would have no reason not to plug in, and, yet, they still choose not to, which implies that people care about something else more than experiences and how they become. So, he then asks to imagine a result machine that would produce “in the world any result you would produce” (119). These machines would theoretically take care of all a person’s desires found in the criterion and beyond, but people would still not choose to plug in. Why? Nozick argues that this is because our desire is to live ourselves instead of letting machines do it for us and that living is what matters to us more than just experiences – or the pleasure that we would receive from those experiences – which is why he claims that plugging in would be the equivalent of committing suicide.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Aristipus And The Pursuit Of Happiness Analysis
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristipus And The Pursuit Of Happiness Analysis

    Even though, Aristippus believes that real happiness is a lifetime of accumulated pleasures, he doesn’t believe rational calculation is an essential part of the pursuit of happiness. Aristippus says we should not calculate because it takes us away from the moment. Aristippus believes that pleasure is a moment to moment thing. He thinks we should not sky hop through life trying to see how we are doing because that takes away from the pleasures in life. Aristippus says accumulation of pleasures but he also says that counting or looking at your pile is tiresome, so you should avoid that.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism And Integrity Analysis
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism And Integrity Analysis

    Jim’s guilt of knowing he killed someone to save his own life would eat at him, as well as George’s decision to actively work somewhere he did not approve of. Consequentialism wants people to put aside any sense of self they have and do things for the greater good, but clearly in Jim and George’s situation, consequentialism is not the way to go. Consequentialism is right in wanting to make decisions for the greater happiness, but not when it comes to these intense situations. Though consequentialism SOUNDS appealing, it is not a realistic view, in some instances it may work to better a situation, but not in…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Stuart Mill's View Of Happiness
    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Stuart Mill's View Of Happiness

    In his book, Mill speaks of many clarifications and objections to his own principle as a way to disregard critics of utilitarianism. Because he is utilitarian, one of the most important clarifications of his idea of happiness that he offers is that it does not matter if one person is unhappy. What matters the most to Mill is that a greater number of are collectively happy. Therefore, the unhappy person would have to sacrifice their own happiness so everyone else can achieve it. Mill also believes that there is no such thing as true happiness because happiness cannot be achieved without a little pain.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  CA Privacy Policy |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings