Do We Agree With Conventional Ethical Relativism?

Decent Essays
I disagree with conventional ethical relativism’s view that there are no objective moral principles. In 2016, there are some moral principles that do not depend on cultural acceptance.
It is almost universally accepted that certain actions are considered wrong, including intentional killing of innocent people, kidnapping, and rape. Simply finding a “culture” that finds these actions as acceptable does not change that these actions are immoral. As mentioned in our readings, it may be easy to find a small group of people that would accept any action as moral or believe in outlandish ideas. For example, there are groups of users on the Internet who claim that they believe that Dzokhar Tsarnaev, one of the Boston Marathon bombers, is innocent

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These universal principles go against ethical relativism to make it…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morals are a tricky subject that philosophers have tried to decipher for some millennia. There have been many arguments regarding morals and where they originate. Some believe moral truths are the same for everyone, while others believe that morality is relative to each person. There is a divide between the two groups and very compelling arguments for and against the two belief systems. Relativism is a philosophy that claims that all things are relative and completely denies absolutes.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While trying to introduce Lewis writings from the book “law of right and wrong”, to the students, Shelton wanted to show that morality is real and is not relative. He observed that most of the students agree to Lewis writings but drew the line when correlating it to business and ethics. For them business is just business and cannot be related to their personal life, in other words, their perception seems that some behaviors are fair in business but that might not be fair in other areas of life, vice versa. And there were some situations where morality can be non-relative and context can matter most and it may explain our tendency towards compartmentalization.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (160). Moral codes differ from culture to culture and each culture tends to have their own individual standards. Cultural relativism is said to be “moral rules differ from society to society” (18). Cultural relativism can be looked at as a theory based on nature of morality. Each culture has their own moral codes, typically created by their ancestors.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conventional Ethical Relativism (Conventionalism) argues that “all moral principles are justified by virtue of their cultural acceptance” (18). In other words, moral principles are not universally valid, rather they are only validated by a culture or individual choice. This theory can be further developed by addressing the Diversity and Dependency theses and Melville Herskovits’ argument supporting the intrinsic values of tolerance in ethical relativism. The Diversity thesis states “what is considered morally right and wrong varies from society to society, so there are no universal moral standards held by all societies” and the Dependency thesis states “all moral principles derive their validity from cultural acceptance" (19). Thus, the diversity and dependency theses permits those in the DRC to claim that rape is morally right since morality can vary between societies and its practice is culturally accepted in the…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subjective relativism is the moral perspective implying that if an individual approves of an action, it is then directed to be moral. For example, an individual can say “X is right,” and someone else can assert that “X is wrong”. When applying subjective relativism to the situation, it justifies that action X is both right and wrong. Suggesting that it can be right for a particular person but wrong for another. Thus, when deciphering whether something is moral or not, it is correlated to individual’s approval (Vaughn 21).…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cultural Relativism is a rule of behavior. It restricts a natural instinct to judge, sort, and distinguish loosely and forbids any form of action. John Rachels’ The Challenge of Cultural Relativism outlines and attacks the theory of cultural relativism. He pays particular attention to the results of Cultural Relativism, and employs various examples to poke holes in the argument. What is important to remember is that his argument must exist under the assumption that a standard of morality that can transcend social differences exists.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays