Comparing Lewis Law Of Right And Wrong

Improved Essays
While trying to introduce Lewis writings from the book “law of right and wrong”, to the students, Shelton wanted to show that morality is real and is not relative. He observed that most of the students agree to Lewis writings but drew the line when correlating it to business and ethics. For them business is just business and cannot be related to their personal life, in other words, their perception seems that some behaviors are fair in business but that might not be fair in other areas of life, vice versa.
And there were some situations where morality can be non-relative and context can matter most and it may explain our tendency towards compartmentalization. For instance, a dress wearable at beach may not be appropriate dress for the worship
…show more content…
At the same time students should always keep in mind that gospel of Christ is not an example simply to be followed in other for the better society, but rather gospel is solely and completely about Christ himself and the righteousness we have in him. Following him may not improve one’s social status or may be slightest, but definitely one’s eternal standing in the sight of god will. And all that matters.
Implications of moral relativism
Moral relativism can be of any several philosophical ideas concerned with the differences in moral judgments varying across different people and cultures. So every judgment about right and wrong is purely a product of person’s preferences and his surrounding environment.
According to moral relativism, no statement or position can be considered -”right or wrong”, “best or worst”. Moral relativism says “it’s true for me, if I believe in
…show more content…
for betterment of one’s well being, ethics should be applied into their lives, situation ethics was created from Christian context, which says that there are no universal rules on right or wrong as each case depends on situation and it deserves a unique solution.
Situation ethics rejects the idea of prefabricated decision and perspective rules. Hence it teaches people that ethical decisions should follow flexible guidelines rather than absolute rules and should be taken on case by case basis.
.Chuck colson’s conclusion on moral absolutes
Chuck colson says there is a real difference in knowng the right thing and doing a right thing. As Christians we always talk about the Christian moral values, but how we can ensure that our beliefs and leading to virtuous behavior in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarly, ethical relativism is the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles, but that all moral principles are valid to culture or individual choice. (Vice and Virtue) On one hand the Diversity thesis believes that morality differ from society to society, and there is no universal moral principles. On the other hand, the Dependency thesis states that all moral principles derive their validity from cultural acceptance. (Vice and Virtue)…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If individuals had no moral values, everyone would be running around without a care in the world and solely worried about themselves. There would be no awareness for anybody or anything so we would turn into selfish human beings. Ethical relativism is “the doctrine that the moral rightness and wrongness of actions vary from society to society and that there are no absolute universal moral standards binding on all men at all times” (Pojman, 14). There are some moral values worldwide that are just adopted overtime and for that I will support Louis Pojman and what he states about ethical relativism being an incoherent theory, how it is much bigger than just individuals or even societies. I strive to hit on conventionalism and subjectivism, which have their up sides but ultimately diminish Pojman’s argument on ethical relativism.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The moral codes claim what is “right” and what is “wrong”. When it comes to cultural relativism, there is no universal truth, however, it does have a cultural code. There are six main points about the topic cultural relativism that may help an individual understand how cultural relativism plays a role into a…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleepers Movie Analysis

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical decisions may not always be the right decision according to law but they can be right according to the circumstances. Ethics is a set of moral principles, especially ones relating to or affirming a specified group, field, or form of conduct. We are all faced with ethical decisions in our life at some point. We have to determine whether or not the choices we make are worth the compromise of our values.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Situational ethics is the approach that an act can’t be classed as right or wrong/ good or evil without first taking into account the influencing factors of that situation. it is based around the Christian principle of agape; which is a selfless, sacrificial, unconditional love and that the demands of love can run contrary to the law (Wells and Quash, 2010). The founder of situational ethics was Joseph Fletcher, who introduced it in his book “Situation Ethics – The New Morality”. If a person decides that an act is wrong without taking into account the influencing factors and if a person bases a decision not on the outcome but on whether the decision is right or wrong they will be going against situational ethics.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who decides what is moral and what is not? In my opinion this way of looking at morality is no better than relativism because there 's no room for exceptions even though sometimes they need to be made in a…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays