Discussion Of Morality In David Hume's Divine Command Theory

Improved Essays
The divine command theory is the belief of what is right is a matter of God’s will, this theory beliefs in the central idea that God’s will is important to morality. In addition to this, the divine command theory believes that what is morally right is commanded by God and what is morally wrong is also commanded by God, which therefore means that morality depends on religion. Furthermore, the divine command theory is a meta ethical view about what makes a moral claim, recognising that God’s will is fundamental to morality. So, the divine command theory emphases the importance that what is right is completely a matter of God’s will.
Socrates states the idea about if an action is right because God commands it, or if God commands it because it is right”. “Socrates questions whether God creates moral truths by commanding to them or whether they simply recognise these truths. To recognise the moral truth, it is discoverable by exploring God’s creation, highlighting on what is natural in contrast to what is unnatural. So, when we want to identify what is morally right, we should consider that what is natural is good and what is unnatural is bad. For instance, birth control is considered unnatural as it disturbs the natural reproductive system, therefore birth control is unnatural and unethical. However, David Hume, disagrees with this theory stating that the term “natural” is
…show more content…
Finally, Hobbes reinforces this difficulty with relying on God’s will as a measure of morality as people interpret God’s will differently. Despite this, the Euthyphro Dilemma has been used to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato believes people should base their morals on the god 's behavior. After proving that gods are not bad, Plato specifically states, “. . . a god is good, he is not––as most people claim–– the cause of everything that happens to human beings of only a few things, good things. . .” (379c). Plato’s idea of basing one’s morals on the behavior of gods is not revolutionary, but a rather common thought.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lest we forget, we are not the supreme masters of our fate. Only God is sovereign. He has created a moral universe in which the law of cause-and-effect is a certainty. Morality includes a person’s standard of conduct or daily practice.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates introduces a problem to Euthyphro asking whether “the pious [is] being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by gods” (Plato 12). One can better understand this concept by relating the Euthyphro Dilemma to the Divine Command Theory and examining the potential philosophical implications associated with the two while indicating their errors. The Divine Command Theory states that morality is “somehow dependent upon God” and that it “consists in obedience to God’s commands”. The Divine Command Theory also says that it’s basis is that it is “ultimately based on the commands or character of God” (Austin).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This idea of divine command is interpreted and applied differently in various…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    James Rachels 's critique of the Divine Command Theory in "The Elements of Moral Theory" rests on three points. Rachels 's first point is that the idea of God "making" something right is a mysterious and therefore not useful assertion. Another point raised by Rachels is the problem that God could easily have given us different commands, making the existing ones arbitrary. If God is the source of the reasons for what is right, then if God had commanded "Thou shalt kill", then killing would be the morally right thing to do instead of refraining from it - a clearly morally repugnant assertion. The final point raised is the simple fact that God 's will is not the basis of people 's reasoning in determining what is right and wrong.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The main idea of it is based on what God has ordered us. People who believe in this theory believe that if God ordered for us to do something, then it is good morally, but, if God prohibited something, then it is wrong morally. Also, God created all humans with free will so we each have the choice to live morally right, by following what God wants us to do, or morally incorrect, by committing acts that God has banned (Rachels p. 53). There are many appealing characteristics to the Divine Command Theory. First, it addresses the problem that is usually faced in ethics because it gets rid of the personal emotions in ethics and makes it objective.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the divine command theory, it makes someone justify an extremely horrific act by claiming God authorized us to do so. This is explained by the divine perfection argument, which is against the divine command theory. If the divine command theory is true, then a morally perfect God could have created a flawless morality that required us to rape little children. But a morally perfect God could not have issued such commands, anyone who did would be morally imperfect. Therefore, the divine command theory is…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay is solely based on the German philosopher Kant Immanuel and British philosopher Thomas Hobbes in relation to their study on morals. Both philosophers have their own understanding on the topic of morality in which both perceive ideas in their own way. Kant leans toward more of a rationalistic view of morality, emphasizing the mandatory need to ground the prior principle. Meanwhile, Hobbes has taken more of an empirical view of the fact that we ought to do what we believe in is in relation to self interest but both occur in order to take a subjective point. In other words, they viewed the issue of morality from a person-centered approach.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, Hobbes states that prior to society morals do not exist. Humans in their state of nature are unable to make a moral distinction between good and evil. Good is simply what they desire, and evil is what they want to…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Divine command theory is a meta - ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. In defence, I shall begin by looking at the modified theory as proposed by Robert Adams. Secondly, I will attempt to assess objections from Plato, Austin and Wainwright; before proceeding to evaluate whether these objections are successful in demeaning this theory. Let us take the modified version of the divine command theory , as proposed by Robert Adams (1987); in defence of the original theory.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays