Marxist Theory Of Ideology

Improved Essays
Discourse, ideology, and hegemony are intertwined. The notion of ideology emerged in the work of Karl Marx. The Marxist notion of ideology focuses on how society is dominated by the interests of the ruling economic class, as a field of social power, where the subordinate classes lacking economic power consent to the hierarchies of social power. Thus, the working class, for instance, is exploited by the dominant/privileged class and takes their exploitation for granted within economic structures of inequality. According to Marx, resistance of ideology should be in a material form. However, feminist theory emphasizes questions about gender, while "race" theory questions the class subject of the theory of ideology and rather focuses on racialized …show more content…
Thus, networks of power are also sites of resistance. Stoddart (2007) argues that the Frankfurt school including Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse, elaborated on Marx's notion of ideology and gave it more dimensions. Although culture products and various media forms were available in the 20th century to masses, they represented the capitalist ideologies of the ruling class, making the working class believe that the capital social relations and social inequality are inevitable and unchangeable. Thus, according to Stoddart (2007), the Frankfurt school theorists emphasize the cultural realm and scientific rationality as important sites of domination, where the dominant classes use ideology to exercise power. This is corrective to Marx's focus on the economic production as the primary source of …show more content…
While power does not derive from language, language is used not only to express power, but to challenge power and change its distribution in the short and long terms. Van Dijk sees the notion of power as meant with the language use of those in power, who are mainly responsible for the inequalities in societies. He investigates how discourse reproduces social domination and power abuses, and how this domination and abuses are resisted by the oppressed groups. The dominant group are able to control the minds of other groups. Thus, the powerful groups constitute a "power base" who have access to scarce social resources, e.g. money, fame, force, knowledge, information, status ... etc. Various resources produce different "types of power", reflected in laws, norms, habits ... etc. Dominant powers either resist, or find this normal. Gramsci uses the notion of "hegemony" to express how the state and civil society maintain consent to the class hierarchies of capitalist society (Hall 1992; Hall 1996b). While Fairclough (1995b) argues that hegemony integrates economy, politics, and ideology, within an overall focus on politics and power, as well as the dialectical relations between classes and class

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    His work raises and important question to Anarchist, if the state is destroyed how can we effectively redistribute power and ensure those who have power, economic power in Marxist terms, will not acquire power again? To effectively understand Karl Marx we must acknowledge when he expresses opinion of power or inequality it has always has to do with class struggles. We must understand power is acquired through resources in a Marxist society and be aware of who has most control over the resources. Elites use power in ways that reproduce inequality and block the mobility of those who are not a part of the ruling class. The class struggle is a result of conflict between two groups that directly oppose each other, the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system. He believed classes existed and there were disparities in society and those inequalities deprived lower classes of materials and resources causing conflict (Krawford, 2009). Mills took it a step further and explained that there is an elite group of powerful individuals in society that occupy positions in bureaucratic organization and large institutions in industrial societies controlling the lower classes (Elwell, 2013). These theories are more key issues as to why happiness for individuals and groups are difficult to achieve. Karl Marx focuses on the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, he argues that this consciousness which is situated in proletariat is due to historical circumstances. Referring to Marx’s historical dialects, he states that that, “consciousness is nothing but the expression of historical necessity” (Lukács 1923). This historical necessity of consciousness compels the proletariat to realize the contradictions and irrationality of a given capitalist society. As the proletariat becomes aware of this irrationality, it will seek to transform society as a communist state. Further, borrowing from the Master-Slave dialectic, Lukács argues that the proletariat has more power to end reification while the bourgeoise might even intensify it.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx's Philosophy

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marx argues that economic structure creates the superstructure and that material relations determine consciousness. However he neglects the weight which ideas bear upon human consciousness. The bedrock of the bourgeois’ hegemony of exploitation exists in the realm of ideas. From ideas, cultural, political, and economic modes of legitimization entrench the domination of one class over another. For Gramsci, consent is of utmost importance and in order to persuade the working class and the bourgeois itself, philosophy and eloquence must be used to the fullest.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed the working class had the power to change the system by uniting together and fighting against capitalism rather than competing against each other all the time. He had used the concept of ideology to help account for how the capitalists protected and preserved their economic interests. Marx had said that the dominant ideas of any society work in the interest of the ruling class, in order to secure their dominance. They have the control to produce and circulate the most important ideas, this is why the meaning-making bodies in any society have the power to represent political ideas in the way they do. “Social Potential has become the private power of the few”…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This means that it focusses on the lower class making change towards the rich and focusing on the poor rather than the dominant. Marxism is best understood as a philosophy that is applied to society rather than a strict theoretical approach for example functionalism. Marxism generally believes that the dominant class who has the most wealth and power make the social system work for themselves not the majority. For example, the dominant class uses it for their selfish needs and to reinforce their dominant status. Created by ideas that reflected the awareness of the early industrial revolution in the UK and later on Europe.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Weber and Foucault conceptualised power and domination in different ways. Weber saw power in terms of authority that emanated and descended from above via powerful agents whereas Foucault saw power as an agentless horizontal force (Rudolph, 2006, p. 3). The differences between the three social theorists and their respected theories is that Marx focuses on economic power, particularly social and economic relationships and how it contributed to production. It was Marx’s belief that the ideal achievement of socialism led to equality and liberation. Weber contrasts to Marx by concentrating on status and rationalisation, believing that Marxism meant that the state had too much control and it potentially could lead to loss of freedoms for the individual.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Engel idea of communism is that “class inequality would end with collective control of property and growth in size of power of the working class” (Essay UK). In summary, under conflict perspective we can say that the basic form of interaction in society is not cooperation, but competition and this leads to conflict. Because individuals and groups compete for advantage and power, there is always going to be conflict in a society. However, when a large group in the lower social class is competing against the upper class for a change, the outcome would often be a major social…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Response To Karl Marx

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main goal of his works was to expose the inherent contradictions of liberal capitalism (Leedham). He believed that capitalism lead to the subjugation and alienation of mankind (Leedham). Capitalism, for Marx, was defined by the mode of production, or the economic system (Leedham). In capitalism there is a small group of owners, known as the Bourgeoisie, who control the means of production as well as the labor force (Leedham). This labor force, the Proletariat, must sell their labor to produce objects that will be sold on the market (Leedham).…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theoretical Framework Van Dijk (1993) in his work, on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), defines power as control. According to him, some groups may have more or less power over others. The privileged groups have complete access to resources, for instance, fame, money, knowledge, information, status and are able to shape the discourses prevalent in the society. It is evident from his work, that power is not absolute. Powerful parties may control others, in specific situations and circumstances, not giving them a chance to participate in the discourse of power.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays