Karl Marx's Dialectic Analysis

Improved Essays
In order to appreciate the central Marxian conception of the dialectic, we must first in the words of Vladimir Lenin, “understand Hegel first”. The main idea of dialectic is the centrality of contradiction, which dialectics believe exist in reality and that the most appropriate way to understand reality is to study the development of those contradictions. Additionally, Hegel used the idea of contradiction to understand historical change and believe that these contradictions could be worked out in our understanding. However, the same cannot be said for Karl Marx, who believed these are real, existing contradictions. The importance of this allowed Marx to study social relations/changes grounded in the material world, or in other words, the ways …show more content…
In other words, numerous individuals who would be considered as the “proletariat” will blame their managers for their ill-fated ways, since managers now may be the ones to alienate workers, and not recognize that it is the capitalist system that is hurting them. Another overlooked factor from Marx could be the fact that in his time these advanced capitalist societies were maintaining their factories in their own countries, and exploiting their own citizens. However, nowadays, most production occurs overseas in incredibly poor areas. Therefore, citizens in these advanced capitalist systems do not suffer from the conditions those in overseas factories do, nor is there a large enough of them who are exploited for a revolution to …show more content…
Before answering this vital question we must define mode of production, and the superstructure that maintains and justifies it. Firstly, the mode of production is the economic ‘base’ of society such as, the forces of production which are comprises of societies means of production, and social relations of production (economic relationships). Furthermore, the superstructure comprises of social institutions like religion, government, and ideologies or, in other words, the dominant ideas and beliefs that justify and maintain the social system (the base influences and shapes the superstructure). In addition, since class is determined by a group’s relationship to the means of production, the upper class is then filled with the dominant class or the ones who own the means of production. In contrast, the lower class is filled with the working class due to them not owning the means of production (which grows due to polarization). Moreover, the dominant class will possess all their own culture which will attempt to justify the exploitation of workers, in turn this ideology of theirs will become the dominant ideology for the reason the dominant class possesses the power to influence culture. Additionally, the ideology will comprise of the ideas, beliefs and values that reflect and support the interests of the dominant upper class, or justifying inequalities and the base (the superstructure). For instance, the capitalists (and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The workers believe that if they subscribe to the system, then they will be appropriately rewarded. Additionally, the concept that the ownership class makes a significantly more money than the working class creates a certain self-image and individual identity. In a capitalistic system, money is power. Therefore, the lower class is viewed as inferior to the rich elites. This feeling of inferiority instills a sense of alienation and insecurity within the working class, and a belief of supremacy within the ruling class.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are millions of hispanic individuals in this society that are deemed to be way below the average when it comes to post-secondary education, however one cannot put the blame on these individuals as in most cases they are simply born with this dilemma, before having a chance to overcome this struggle that will hinder their chances of achieving success later in life. This paper will focus on examining several factors that can be affecting the overall education attainment of individuals who would be considered to be minorities in our society, particularly hispanic and latino individuals. Karl Marx’s Conflict Theory will be used as it perfectly justifies the difficulties we individuals face, including myself thanks to the changes put in place…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It pits the wealthy against the lower class of society. This conflict is not the product of greed, or the lack of compassion for the poor, but it is the product of capitalism in Marx 's view. Marx contends that a capitalist society can only lead to social inequality by reason of, it is designed to promote individualism . The proletariat sells their labor to the bourgeoisie, or the capitalist, for money, but the capitalist owns the machines, the building, the product, and everything else associated with making the product.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx stated that proletariat was oppressed and under the exploitation of the bourgeoisie. The workers would create products that the capitalist would sell for more than it was actually worth. There was profit from this system, but the proletariat did not benefit from it. According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Porter Income Inequality

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Therefore, even though Marx’s theory of class conflict explains the inequality discussed in this article, there are numerous factors that also need to be considered including the existence of a middle class, the dynamic nature of inequality, and the role of class in people’s…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The German revolutionary socialist, philosopher, economist and sociologist, Karl Marx himself believes in social conflict, because it creates separation of the bourgeoisie (capitalist) and proletariat. Marx view people as hard workers, who will do anything to survive. As a people, you either work for someone or own the product. When you own the product, you’re in control and you make money. When you work for someone you are at their mercy, and if you want to survive, you do as you’re told.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Heinrich Marx was born on 5 May 1818 in Germany, when Europe was going through rapid social changes after the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution. His interest in philosophy was greatly influenced by a German philosopher, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, when he read about his works at University. Subsequently, he gained understanding from the materialistic ideas of Ludwig Feuerbach and further developed them into his own sociological theories. Marx discovered that the society was split into two main classes, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is characterized by the relations of economic subordination and domination. Marx looked at society and division of labour and finds that two different class that bring differences…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics