The case of Marlise Munoz happened on November 23rd of 2013. A 33 years old woman was found lifeless by her husband. She was taking to the hospital, where later her family was told that Marlise was brain dead from possibly suffering a pulmonary embolism. However, hospital refused to take Marlise from life support because at that time she was 14 weeks pregnant. Texas has a law that prevents withdrawal of life support from a pregnant woman.…
I support Jecker and Pagon’s side. Futility and inhumanity have medical and moral meanings and can be useful in deciding whether to continue or withdraw medical intervention. The main goal of a physician is to make sure that their patient benefits from the treatment. Such as in the case they described of Michael, the infant born with prune belly syndrome, the child was not born to live a full and healthy life right from the start. The doctors tried their best in the short three months of his life, but it was next to impossible to remain hopeful of fixing him.…
Rebecca Skloot’s book, “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, combines investigative reporting and scientific research to expose the race, gender, socioeconomic status, and bioethical issues regarding HeLa cells. As the story unfolds, Henrietta Lacks, a poor black women, seeks treatment in 1951 for gynecological issues at Johns Hopkins Hospital. As A result, a few days later she receives the diagnosis of epidermoid carcinoma of the cervix, stage I. Not long after, Henrietta had her first cancer treatment at Johns Hopkins. During the procedure, tissue from her tumor and healthy cervix cells were collected unbeknownst to Henrietta and her family without consent. These cells were then given to the head of tissue culture at Johns Hopkins,…
Test Item #2: The definition of the word autonomy means to be self-determined or to have free will. Patients, who are competent and are of an appropriate age, all have the ability to be autonomous when it comes to making decisions about their healthcare.…
One’s worldview are values or set of believes that guides and influences how a person thinks, learns and does things. One’s view impacts decisions made on behalf of imperiled newborns which raises some ethical issues. According to Butts & Rich, decisions made of withholding and withdrawing of intensive invasive treatment should follow standards of best interest. These decisions are among the most difficult of any which made on behalf of the newborns and it is hard to decide whose responsibility it is. In my opinion, in the light of evidence based practices, some treatments are unnecessarily and have no benefit for the…
In this case is used the medical paternalism theory. “From another perspective, if life itself, rather than life of a certain quality with autonomy and dignity, were of ultimate value, then even defensive wars could never be fortified” (Steinbock 66p) “Ashley, called the “pillow angel” by her parents, suffers from a developmental brain condition known as static encephalopathy “(P Clark). When I did research about this case I find out the exact type of brain damage Ashley has. “Static encephalopathy - permanent brain damage or dysfunction.…
Summery of Are housestaff identifying malnourished hospitalized medicine patients? By Michael A. Mitchell, Donald R. Duerksen, and Adam Rahman Hospitals have a percentage of “40%-60%”(Mitchell, 2014, p.1192) of patients admitted with malnutrition. The “nutritional and functional status” has plummeted leaving elderly patients to increase their stay. Malnourished patients are more susceptible to infections, which lead to “impaired wound healing”(Mitchell, 2014).…
If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…
In the other hand, for the most part doctors are often thought of to be justified in withdrawing life support. This draws to a conclusion that attempts to prove that removing life support as well as physician assisted death are not forms of killing a person. Voluntary active euthanasia is in fact seen as a form of killing so it must be an unjustified cause of death for a patient. Brock argues that there are some circumstances where not all killings are unjustified. The only occasion or exception to his argument of unjustified death is that a death is unjustified is if the patient greatly values something such as their future, and it is ended…
Paragraph 3 – Against Wrongful life should not be recognised as a compensable tort in Australia. The High Court has been wary of making decisions about what kind of actions are compensatable since the case of Distillers Co. (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson (Laura Anne) [1971] which was a case arising due to the effects of thalidomide. In recent years the case of Harriton v Stephens [2006], has been the benchmark for decisions of wrongful life. In this case there was a claim for wrongful life by a disabled child who claimed they would have been better off not to be born, than to be born with their severe disabilities. The decision by the court was that the claim for wrongful life should be rejected, it was suggested by Crennan J that ‘Cattanach…
In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…
Should dying people be kept on life support is a question all people ask at some point in their life. My opinion is they should not keep dying people on life support. The person dying in the hospital / hospice is most likely brain dead or in a great state of pain. All around there is a massive toll from a compilation of bills, feelings and more let alone what happen to the patient no matter if the person is short term or long term support. I can't imagine being in that much pain there is no reason to be filling up a hospital / hospice if your governmentally pronounced dead of in other words brain dead.…
Mordechai Dov Brody Final Essay: Analysis of an Ethical Issue Amanda Ard 4/20/17 Introduction: Mordechai Dov Brody was a 12 year old boy. He was pronounced brain dead after he received surgery and treatment for a malignant brain tumor. His parents, Orthodox Jews say that according to their faith he is not dead until his heart stops beating. A machine inflates and deflates his lungs, however his heart continues to beat on its own thanks to a mix of intravenous drugs and adrenaline.…
Nurses play a central role in advocating for their patients. In the case of Freda, the moral conflict between the nurse and physician revolves around the implementation of a feeding tube, in which the nurses feel does not respect Freda’s wishes. In utilitarianism, the beneficence principle means the value of the good (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440). In Freda’s case she defines good as dying peacefully. In Kantianism, the principle of autonomy states that the competent individual has the right to be self-determining (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440).…
The benevolence in the case is having a life support so that the patient will live, the beneficence though with very similar meaning--it can be Mr. Corbett will not require life support for his wife because to lessen the burden to his wife or to require a life support to continue the life of his wife. Nevertheless, Mr. Corbett sided with his wife that a life support is no longer…