Differences In The Role Of Media In Crime And The Media

923 Words 4 Pages
For this assignment, I will explain the differences in the handling of each type of crime by the government, as well as exploring the different crime levels, as far as misdemeanors vs felonies and the different punishments for these types of crimes. In addition, I will evaluate the role of the media in crime description and portrayal. Lastly, I will explain the differences in the theoretical applications for these types of crimes and explain how the theories differentiate between these types of criminal behaviors. The legislative function should regulate the municipal procedures of penalizing and ratify the constitutional outline for the sentencing structure. The legislative function is performed best by laws that articulate the common tenacities …show more content…
From movies, books, newspapers, magazines, TV shows, video games, music, to everyday discussions, we are constantly engaging in crime dialog. The mass media play a significant part in the structure of misconduct and the criminal justice system. The nation’s insight of victims, criminals, deviants, and law enforcement officials is largely determined by their portrayal in the mass media. Research shows that most public knowledge about crime and justice is resulting from the media (Dowler, 2016). Crime has always been and will always be an existing subject of attention in every culture as the media presents it for the purposes of both information and entertainment. The fact that crime has the potential for being news worthy or a topic for a TV series, is because it holds undesirable constructions and standards which are critical in the structure of news (Han Er, …show more content…
Unfortunately, there are some individuals who become repeat offenders with long rap sheets. Location clearly plays a big role but it is only one of many issues. I believe that the routine activity theory would cover misdemeanor crimes because it states that crime is predictable, and that if the target is attractive enough, crime will happen; actual procedures must be in order to prevent misconduct from taking place. However, I believe that the positivist theory would be best for violent felonies because it states that individuals who obliges in crimes cannot ethically understand the hurt, pain, and danger of his or her actions the same way individuals of normal intellect or individuals who are socially accepted. The cognizance of these people has been affected in a certain way, so they do not have the competence to make a sensible, sane choice to obey the law (Criminology Theories: The Varied Reasons Why People Commit Crimes,

Related Documents

Related Topics