Vegetarianism Vs Compatibilism

Decent Essays
Compatibilism holds that human behavior is both caused and determined and voluntary behavior is nonetheless free to the extent that it is not outwardly expressed; however, Libertarianism, on the other hand, implies that all of our choices are free from any sort of deterministic theories or forces. Compatibilism is suited best for explaining free will as it acknowledges man as a free moral agent while being restrained by the doctrine of total depravity; Libertarianism takes upon itself to rely on concepts that tend to juxtapose one another, such as Open Theism, in order to rationalize free will. Compatibilism, as mentioned previously, is the view that causal determinism is true, but mankind still acts freely, being morally responsible agents …show more content…
Every action completed has no foundation from which it is based from. In other words, there are no outside agents of causation that explain behaviors. Concepts such as determinism and freedom aren’t compatible because they both juxtapose one another. One cannot truly act freely if the choices presented to them force them to choose one behavior out of the seemingly endless amount of possible behaviors they could’ve chosen. This “grants the illusion of free will instead of free will itself, creating a dissonance between true free will and elements of determinism” (Perry 395). Libertarianism holds that determinism is false and actions that are explained by pre-determined forces do not exist. Open Theism, a component to the Libertarian rationalization of free will, asserts that God choses to be ignorant of the choices we make throughout our lives. The theory relies on the fact that God, being omnipotent, has knowledge of every outcome that has the potential to be a reality. However, doesn’t know the outcome that will become the reality. Thus, free will is preserved, and the idea of an all-knowing God, can coexist with one another. The idea that free will and an all-knowing God can coexist in the same universe highlights one of the most predominant virtues that come along with the Libertarian perspective on free will. However, the biggest drawback to Libertarianism, for myself, would have to be the relying on God …show more content…
When interpreting free will from a compatibilist perspective, everything can be explained through causal relationships. Why do people behave according to their own interests? Because free will is determined by which actions produce the most benefits for the self. Which actions can we choose from? Only those pre-determined by mankind’s innate sinful nature. Everything has an explanation, which is better than the uncertainty that comes along with Libertarianism. How can actions be explained if no force or agent is to blame for their execution? It’s simply harder to imagine actions that have no reason for their execution and a God that doesn’t know which outcomes have become realities. All these ideas seem be based on loose speculation that don’t have much merit in terms of the bigger picture. Proponents of the Libertarian view on free will would argue that free will is independent of agents of causation therefore, actions are based only on whether the individual desires to complete the action. At its core, Libertarianism rejects determinism and focuses on ideas that concern themselves with liberal independence. I would respond by stating that, actions need foundations from which they are based on. Human nature checks free will by allowing for a reason for actions being chosen and executed.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Incompatibilism cover two terms that are hard determinism and libertarian. Hard determinism conclude that if determinism is valid than no need of freewill. but, libertarian is opposite to it by rejecting determinism in the face of freewill (Sider 2014). Free will mean the action that we choose without under pressure of…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When discussing the humane contrast between Free Will and Determinism, Free Will is the side I support. My argument is the concept that all natural occurrences can’t always be explained, but they “just happen”. Even though scientific facts contradict Free Will, a balance of the two beliefs is very possible and is controversial in modern conversation. All human beings contain Free Will in any scenario or situation they encounter; Although this is different for each individual and their beliefs. First we must define the term Free Will; Free Will is the doctrine that the conduct of human beings expresses personal choice and is not simply determined by physical or divine forces ("The Definition Of Free Will").…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Those who believe in this idea are called “hard” determinists, which they deem no one is responsible for their actions. However, the alternative to hard determinism is Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the act of believing humans are free from determinism and its forms. Libertarians believe that determinism and free will cannot be as one. Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free Will Problem

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    the PKG god) and though using god seems like it would cancel out any question that free will does in fact exists, in actuality bringing god into it makes things more complicated. The concept of free choice and a god that is both all knowing and all good is paradoxical because if god is not ignorant of our choices and is aware of them before we even make them, then how are our decisions made freely? In addition, how is god all good? After all, a god that is all good would surely interfere if he knew that a choice made would cause suffering. To conclude, if one believes in the PKG one must also admit that the free will does not actually exist because that would mean that god is unaware of the choices one makes and therefore is not all-knowing or all good.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This essay will outline Cullison’s sacrifice argument against the problems of divine hiddenness. It will then show that this argument does not work, as a world in which true human sacrifice is possible is not a better world than one where God is not hidden. I will refer to the former as a ‘Godless World’ and the latter as a ‘Godly World’. There are three themes which this essay will address: true human sacrifice, two potential worlds and human freedom. I will conclude that a ‘Godly World’ – even if true human sacrifice is not possible within that world – is better than a ‘Godless World’ where true human sacrifice is possible.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order for us to have complete freedom, this action must be casually undetermined; the agent must be the sole cause of the action. To ensure freewill, there first must be an uncaused action. Libertarians believe that it is impossible to prove that determinism is true, determinists in particular hard determinists believe that every event has a cause, and freedom does not exist. However libertarians demonstrate two ways to show that causation cannot be applied to everything in the universe, in the chaos theory and through quantum…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God was and is not a puppet master. I believe we were put on earth to make our own choices on whether or not to follow God. I believe God knows in the end what we choose but I do not believe he makes that choice for us. I believe that because humans and Christians have free will we are able to be in control of our actions. We sin because we have the ability to perform actions God does not approve of.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To solve the problem of moral evil, John Hick argues that in order for God to have created the human entity he had to create him with the capacity for freewill. If he had not done so, a person would no longer carry his or her identity as a person. In response to the argument of God creating a free person who would always make the right decision, Hick argues that the contradiction in itself does not make sense despite the apparent logic. In order for something to be free it must be free of any causation by an outside source. There cannot be any choice out of reach or not allowed.…

    • 2670 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free Will Defense Summary

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is because traditional theists believe that both agents who make it to heaven and God have libertarian freedom yet cannot choose wrong freely. Second, they believe God, who is morally perfect, has libertarian freedom but cannot choose wrong freely. In this paper, I will argue that even if both beliefs are true, God cannot directly create agents with libertarian…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays