Moral Code Research Paper

Improved Essays
Ethics and Moral Code: Are There Right or Wrong Actions
Chernice Washington
Student I.D.:0020291776
October 02,2016¬¬
Philosophy 1020
Professor: Ian Young
Words: 1,000+

Majority of society today believes that slavery is wrong. A utilitarian would argue slavery is wrong because it is the action that causes the most amount of suffering and the greatest overall amount of dissatisfaction. Viewing slavery as a whole means that a person is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them. Subjectivism states that whether slavery is right or wrong is only dependent of a culture’s viewpoint. “If the culture’s moral code says slavery is wrong, then it really is wrong within that culture and if another culture’s moral code says it is right,
…show more content…
P: If humans cannot be the author of the moral law, then God is its author.
C: Therefore, God is the author of the moral law.”
God is the creator of all things also making him the creator of morality. Refuting the Euthyphro Dilemma and arguing the Divine Command Theory, God has reasons to support his commands and they are not arbitrary. These reasons, rather than the Euthyphro Dilemma, are what makes actions right or wrong. According to some cultural groups moral code, slavery is right. In other cultural groups moral code, slavery is wrong. Therefore, there is no objective truth about whether slavery is morally right or wrong. Cultures make their own moral rules but, in a way culture becomes god. “In their worldview, Cultural Relativists believe that the truth about ultimate reality is that:
• No absolute truth exists, or we cannot know absolute truth
Thus, the role of God (ultimate reality) is filled by a person’s culture; your culture sets all the standards for right and wrong, rather than God. Your culture determines truth. Culture takes the place of God”. This is where I disagree. if there is no ultimate reality making the rules, then there are no rules. The presence of ‘moral rules’ is nothing more than what the powerful in each culture have declared or what people made

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lest we forget, we are not the supreme masters of our fate. Only God is sovereign. He has created a moral universe in which the law of cause-and-effect is a certainty. Morality includes a person’s standard of conduct or daily practice.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Douglass 289). By saying this he makes a point that slavery cannot come from God, that slavery is wrong, and bad things do not come by God’s…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder And Lying Analysis

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before Rachels stated his stand regarding the cultural judgment of the “excision” he stated that we, all of the cultures should have at least some of our values or moral codes that each culture has in common. Rachels gives the example of Murder and lying to make his point that we all have some moral codes or virtues that are universal by stating “…there are some moral rules that all societies must have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist. The rules against lying and murder are two examples. And in fact, we do find these rules in force in all viable cultures. Cultures may differ in what they regard as legitimate exceptions to the rules, but this disagreement exists against a background of agreement on the larger…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of the universe stands in need of explanation. The only explanation that is logical is that God created it. (Holt, The Kalam Cosmological Argument) The universe is thought to have a beginning in time that its existence is thought to stand in need of explanation. (Holt, The Kalam Cosmological Argument)…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Dilemma The Euthyphro dilemma is an argument that was brought about by a question asked by Socrates during Plato’s Euthyphro. The question is seen to object the Divine Command Theory. Socrates asked, “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” or in other words, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?”…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are they right or are they wrong? Moral opinions are different among people and are not any clearer in the Bible. We cannot know for sure on some subjects, which are right or wrong. We can on speculate about them and try to make whichever decision feels better. If God gave us morality we would automatically know what was considered right and what was considered wrong.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (160). Moral codes differ from culture to culture and each culture tends to have their own individual standards. Cultural relativism is said to be “moral rules differ from society to society” (18). Cultural relativism can be looked at as a theory based on nature of morality. Each culture has their own moral codes, typically created by their ancestors.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No matter what we think or believe, things are what they are because that is how they exist in the universe. There is a higher power who says what is morally good and how we should live our lives. If I had to respond to an opposing argument, I would have to say that you cannot have a cookie cutter approach to morality. Society needs rules to function because they are absolutes, providing a structure we can all live by.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the moral issues presented in this book were not wrong because the culture determined they were right. While the actions brought by imperialistic ideology, racism, and the corruption of man may have been barbaric; they were justified by cultural relativism. The normative system of relativism clearly outlined a pattern, if morality is relative, then nothing can be…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in cultural relativism it is normally all the members of that certain culture who decides on what is morally acceptable. Perhaps this is why Thomas (2014) believed that, moral beliefs within a culture are true or false depending on whether they accord with the prevailing believes in that culture. However, I believe that both theories are related to a certain extent. For instance, we are all born belonging to a certain culture, community, or society.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    God 's Call, by John E. Hare, is based on three lectures Hare gave at Calvin College in which he presents and defends his version of Divine Command Theory. The books is separated into three essays. The first essay gives the historical context of Hare 's theory. In the second Hare lays out his theory. In the third he defends his theory, and compares it to his understanding of Kant 's theory of ethics.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, moral truth is relative and varies from culture to culture. Further on, he justifies why the cultural relativism argument is invalid, and why cultural relativism (if it were true) is an unacceptable form of morality. Finally, he makes concessions to acknowledge some valuable learning points of cultural relativism. In this essay, I argue the flaws in his conclusions and maintains that although it is important for objective truths to exist, cultural relativism may still be a best explanation for some extreme cases of disagreements that we observe today.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics