What Is Divine Command Theory In God's Call

Superior Essays
God 's Call, by John E. Hare, is based on three lectures Hare gave at Calvin College in which he presents and defends his version of Divine Command Theory. The books is separated into three essays. The first essay gives the historical context of Hare 's theory. In the second Hare lays out his theory. In the third he defends his theory, and compares it to his understanding of Kant 's theory of ethics. Hare argues that the history of moral philosophy is a story of compromise. There exist two extreme camps, the realists who believe that morality has a objective existence, and the expressivists who believe that morality does not exist at all. Over time both camps have made concessions, and drifted closer to the opposite camp. Hare believes that …show more content…
The commands of God have four important qualities which must be understood in order to understand Hare 's philosophy1. Firstly, God does not give commands in order to control his creation; he is always in control. He commands as invitation to his creation to love and obey him. Secondly, God 's commands are understood subjectively; like in Hugo 's philosophy, Hare believes that everyone knows what God commands of him. He writes that individuals feel the “pull of the good [the commands of God]... independently of their evaluation” (49). Thirdly, God 's commands are good regardless of what he commands, and he has the freedom to command anything. Fourthly, obedience results in the individual spending eternity with …show more content…
He uses “good” to mean “being like God, or having a positive relation to God”. In this way Hare makes statements like, God is good, what God wills is good, God 's plan is good, and godliness is good. This definition of “good” is useful because it shows us how to find goodness. When we want to know if something is good we simply ask, “does God say Yes to it?”. If he does it is good; if he doesn 't it is not good. Hare uses the word good differently when he writes, “we need to trust that this constraint [the obligation to obey God] is consistent with our good.” (49). Because of Hare 's negative view of selfishness the phrase “our good” cannot mean “our benefit”. Therefore it must mean something like “our values”. If this is the case, what does it mean to trust that obedience is consistent with what we find valuable? It means that no one fully knows what actions are best to take. We must trust that obedience is what is best for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Divine Command theory is explained as “a dependency thesis theory that maintains that morally right acts are simply those that God commands or wills for us to do” (265.) With Love Thy Neighbor being one of the Ten Commandments, if one believes in the Divine Command Theory, they must follow this commandment always. In my opinion, a believer who accepts Divine Command Theory would have no moral obligation to sponsor a child. The Bible states in Mark 12:13 “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' There is not another commandment greater than these.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bridges makes a good point where we as Christians are called to be like God, and that holiness “is nothing less than conformity to the character of God” (Bridges, 30). For God holiness is like one of his many superpowers. As God is always holy then we should have no fear that what he does for us is perfect and always right. Hebrews 12:14 says, “Make every effort…to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord” (NIV). Disobedience as Bridges discusses later on is a great deal to God.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This idea of divine command is interpreted and applied differently in various…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the discussion “Can You Be Good Without God?,” one controversial issue has been you don’t need God to be good. On one hand, people that believe in a religion follow their moral values. That argues with people that don’t have any religion, like atheist that believe they can be good without God. On the other hand, atheists have no belief in any God and believe that they can be good no matter what. That contends to people that think being good with God is following their moral values.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, not all disobedience is a virtue. Anyone who only obeys is a slave, while those who only disobey are rebels; they do not act for their own principles. Rebellion is the same as obedience if it is unquestionably followed; people must have a logical thought process behind their actions. Fromm says that obedience is wrong when we go against our logical and moral beliefs by obeying. We should never obey as an act of submission, only as an act of affirmation to our own logic and beliefs.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder Is Murder Wrong

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    God created us so they we could live together peace, not for us to harm each other. Cultural relativism might say that beliefs vary from one culture to another. Therefore, not all the cultures believe in god. This means that the sixth commandant doesn’t apply to some cultures. That being the case, some societies have no desire to follow god’s rule.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And so obedience is very important for success (Chopra, 2015,…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Divine command theory is a meta - ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. In defence, I shall begin by looking at the modified theory as proposed by Robert Adams. Secondly, I will attempt to assess objections from Plato, Austin and Wainwright; before proceeding to evaluate whether these objections are successful in demeaning this theory. Let us take the modified version of the divine command theory , as proposed by Robert Adams (1987); in defence of the original theory.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, the human race has struggled with whether it is essentially good or inherently evil. Even the greatest minds have had difficulty finding a definitive answer to this perplexing conundrum. Saint Augustine of Hippo, Hobbes, and Nietzsche all pondered this and were unable to come up with a simple answer. Fortunately, the debate that has lasted for millennia is coming to a halt. However, in order to successfully analyze the ways of humankind, a clear framework must be established.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays