Difference Between Broken Home And Delinquency
According to Siegel & Welsh (2011), since 1950s, opponents of this theory have questioned the use of records obtained from police, courts, and correctional facilities to establish the connection between children from broken homes and delinquency. Siegel & Welsh (2011) argue that even though it is true that there exists a natural propensity for children from broken homes to be arrested, it does not necessarily imply that they engage in frequent delinquent behavior compared to their counterparts from intact families. To this effect, opponents argue that children from intact homes are just as likely to engage in delinquency as those from broken homes, and that the absence of parents weighs more on the behavior of agents of the criminal justice system, rather than the behavior of children from broken …show more content…
This essentially means that at least 54% of whites in America have lived in an intact family, while only 17% of African-Americans have experienced the same. According to Fagan & Hadford (2015), between 1950 and 2012, these figures have dropped from 67% to 54% for whites, and 38% to 17% for African-Americans.
With a rejection index of 83%, less than one fifth of African American teenagers between ages 15 to 17 have grown up in a household where both parents are married (Fagan & Hadford, 2015). In contrast, the rate of belonging of among white teenagers between 15 and 17 years more than triples that of African-American teenagers. Family belonging has also continuously decreased for African-America children of all ages. In this respect, it is justified to state that African-American children face decreased levels of family intactness. In contrast, levels of belonging among White children have remained fairly consistent. For example, in 2008, 76% of 2 year old whites experienced belonging, which deceased only slightly to 75% in