Descartesian Doubt Analysis

Improved Essays
If I close my eyes and doubt that everything exists, all I can hear is the heater running in the room I’m in. I don’t really smell or taste anything. I would have to agree with Descartes in that I must exist because I am thinking. I must have a brain or I wouldn’t be able to think, so I am alive and a thinking thing. If I couldn’t think, then I wouldn’t be living. I know I have a body because I can move my extremities. I believe with certainty that I am alive and capable of thought and have a physical body. Descartes had a method that involved treating all of your former beliefs as if they were false, which came to be known as the Method of Cartesian Doubt (Classics, 52). Descartes advised that a person should reject the belief if they had …show more content…
So Descartes decided to evaluate his beliefs before starting the constructive stage of his work. This was recognized as a once in a lifetime exercise. Descartes believed there were apparent certainties, such as 2+3=5 and that a square has four sides. Descartes speaks of a strong test when searching for a belief that’s immune from doubt, the evil demon (Classics, 53). It may at times seem to be a little extreme, but when searching for a belief which is immune from doubt, the thought experiment of the evil demon is a very strong test. Descartes says that even if the evil demon is tricking him into believing 2+2 to be five, that the demon cannot trick him concerning his own existence. I have to agree with Descartes “I think, therefore I am”, and that I cannot be tricked into thinking I do not exist. I cannot deny that I am a living thing capable of thought. I also am not sure if I can always trust my senses because they can deceive me. Descartes talks about wax in an example revealing his belief that we can acquire knowledge of the nature of the world by reason alone. The wax taken from the honeycomb is hard and

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the end of his doubting everything, the only thing Descartes are certain about is “I think, therefore I am”, this is known as “Cogito ergo sum” in Latin. Descartes argues that we may not actually have a physical body but what he is…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the passage from Descartes’ Meditation, the conclusion is that Descartes now has reason to doubt all of his beliefs including those of his senses. The premises seem to be: (1) If an omnibenevolent god wouldn’t deceive us then there must be an evil demon doing so. (2) If an evil demon is our source of deception then one cannot know true beliefs. In the passage from Sweetman’s “The Pseudo-Problem of Skepticism” the conclusion is that we should not take the problem of skepticism seriously because we have no reasons to do so. The premises seem to be: (1) We know that it is not possible to be a brain in a vat.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Renee Descartes False

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his other papers, Descartes speaks of being a methodological skeptic. Being a methodological skeptic is attempting to eliminating all possible false beliefs and then from that basis, gaining only true beliefs. By claiming that he is uncertain that his sense experiences may be false is a huge step towards this skepticism. He then contrives through logical reasoning that it is the case that he is a existing entity that has the ability to think. These beliefs, to Descartes, are beliefs that are proven to be true and cannot be proven otherwise, making these beliefs impervious to any methodological skeptical doubt.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A challenge to Skepticism Through Hilary Putnam's “Brains in a Vat” argument, he aims to refute the idea of philosophical skepticism introduced by René Descartes. At the conclusion of the first meditation in his First Meditations on Philosophy, Descartes argues that an evil demon may be artificially creating all of our life experiences. Through his hypothesis, Descartes exemplifies philosophical skepticism of the existence of an external world. Ideas, life events, experiences and beliefs that seem to be acquired from interactions with the external physical world are merely illusions created by a deceptive, evil demon. Although Descartes presents a compelling argument for his skepticism of our perceived ideas, it has been argued that his argument cannot stand because of its self-refutation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Ignorance

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes way to achieve assurance was to initiate by doubting absolutely everything. The belief or principle or general truth would have to be impossible to doubt; its assurance would have to be eventual and not contingent upon any other belief, and it would have to indicate to something actually existing if the existence of other things in the world were to be concluded from it. Descartes examined his beliefs by groups or classes to observe if he could find one that was impossible to doubt. He began to examine those beliefs based on sense perceptions, deducing in the eventual that they were unreliable and therefore couldn't lead to certain knowledge . In regards to the wax example, the wax example exemplifies how knowledge cannot fundamentally…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes may not be able to know the truth, but this will allow him to not fall for what is false. In his second meditation, Descartes expresses that everything he sees is not real and that his memories, senses, or physical surroundings cannot be trusted. For a moment, Descartes doubts his own existence, questioning whether it is he who controls his own thoughts or if it is a higher power, God, who has control over him. Descartes also denies the notion of body, sense, and mind; he almost denies his entire existence but resolves this statement by saying that if an evil demon is trying to deceive him then…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes attempted to establish a firm and permanent foundation for scientific knowledge. Philosophers raise the question of whether or not Descartes ' epistemological project was successful. Antoine Arnauld criticized Descartes ' project and accused him of circular reasoning. Many philosophers try to defend Descartes from this objection. However, Arnauld 's objection makes a valid criticism, which shows that Descartes ' epistemological project ultimately fails.…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Reality, a state of the world for what things truly are and as they truly exist. Reality has perplexed philosophers to an extent, but perhaps none more so than the maddening words of Descartes in his meditations. To say that his words are maddening is a bit ingenuous to Descartes, but what he does propose is out of place. There have been skeptics before Descartes, but the level of skepticism he reaches is quite absurd and even more, it would be absurd if it was even true and could not be refuted in any argument. To begin with Descartes’ evil genius, there will be two vital topics of discussion, doubt, and certainty.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the following essay, one wishes to discuss why there can never be any justification for a belief in Other Minds. Descartes offers up “I think therefore I am” in First Meditations on Philosophy (Descartes, 1641), which has it’s fair share of problems but one wishes to use this quote to illustrate that while Descartes only proved that ‘I’ exist within one 's own mind, there is nothing to say that this must extend to others too. Or even to anyone but Descartes and Myself. And while that may seem an irrational claim, one shall go on to justify why this claim may hold as much rationality as its negation.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And thus they exist. Descartes produces an explanation of the deception he has experienced in the past. Claiming it’s his fault because of his misuse of god’s gift, allowing the will to extend beyond the intellect. So under these rules, Descartes has provided a method to examine the problem.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    one’s existence is real or not simply because thinking about it is proof in itself. Which is why Descartes supported logic over religion or traditions. He believed one could think for themselves and learn on our own by experiences, rather than follow the command of others. This is why he was such a hero to the leaders of the French revolution. He explained that engaging in thinking helps prepare a person for the task at hand called life.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays