Descartes Devil Demon Analysis

Superior Essays
Show More
The Existence of God and the Devil Demon

In Descartes’s piece of philosophical writing, “Meditations on First Philosophy”, he argues that he has the idea of God, therefore God exists. In my paper, I will contend that the same argument will not apply for the possibility of the Evil Demon.
In the beginning of the Meditations, Descartes claims if he want to establish the stability of anything in science, he must start over from the foundations. He set the standard for knowledge, which must be indubitable and certain. Descartes comes to the model of the cunning, malicious, powerful Evil Demon (p.3), who tries his best to deceive Descartes’s experiences by applying the method of doubt. On the contrary, Descartes also has the idea of God, who …show more content…
In proving the existence of God, Descartes make a claim that something can’t arise from nothing, and can’t arise from what is less perfect (p.12). Descartes brings out two concepts of reality. The “intrinsic reality” is a degree of perfection where the God has the highest scale because of his unlimited and supreme power. The “representative reality” is the representational contents of “intrinsic reality”. For example: the Idea of God represents God, the name represents each person. Since God is eternal, infinite, unchangeable, omniscient, and omnipotent (p.12), the idea of him is in the highest scale of representative reality. God and the idea of God have an extreme position in both intrinsic and representative scale respectively. Every idea has a same level of intrinsic reality, so God holds more level of intrinsic reality than Descartes’s idea of God. Although, Descartes, himself is not wholly perfect (p.14), he has an idea of God that lies in the extreme position in the representational scale. Given that the Idea of God, which has an absolutely unlimited content, could not have originated from Descartes, who is finite and imperfect. The source of the idea must be perfect and infinite itself. Descartes is less perfect than God. Consequently, the idea of God in Descartes is innate and it could only origin from God. It is now certain that God does …show more content…
Descartes states that if God wanted to, he can easily deceive Descartes, but he would not because with his mighty and perfections, he is a non-deceiver and the leads Descartes to the truth. The Evil Demon, who is also extremely powerful, but not omnibenevolent. He is a deceiver. By applying the same intrinsic reality scale, I think that the Evil Demon has more intrinsic reality than Descartes, but less than God. Descartes also has the idea of the Demon, but it must not be internally produced by Descartes because he has less the intrinsic idea. It could not be acquired either because Descartes comes to the Evil Demon while establishing the certain. So, the idea of the Evil Demon is innate in Descartes, and it might me put by the God or the Evil Demon. If the supreme God exists, he would not anyone be deceived because of his perfection. While the Evil is trying to confuse views, God leads Descartes to true knowledge. If he let the Demon do so, therefore God must be a deceiver too. God is imperfect, which differs from his utter perfection. Therefore, the Evil Demon can not

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Fifth Meditation: The Ontological Argument For God
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Fifth Meditation: The Ontological Argument For God

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    I Believe In God Rhetorical Analysis
    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I Believe In God Rhetorical Analysis

    Descartes tries to make sense of the existence of God by using Adequate reality, the belief that an idea must have as much formal reality as it has objective…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argument For Defective Nature Doubt By Descartes
    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument For Defective Nature Doubt By Descartes

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Ontological Argument
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes Ontological Argument

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Ontological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ontological Argumentative Analysis

    Without added determination in Descartes predicate he lacks an explanation to why God exist and how existence is a predicate to perfection and in the end, it is just an apple with such and such characteristics but existence itself doesn’t give the apple characteristics. With this being said, the…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditation Argument
    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes Meditation Argument

    In the finality of Descartes' first meditation, the meditator is already facing supreme doubt of all formerly inherited and empirical knowledge and builds an approach towards creating a foundation of doubt on all previous beliefs. Believing to have called all of their beliefs into question, the meditator still demands reason to doubt arithmetic and geometric knowledge – a knowledge that to them feels most intuitive; a “perfect knowledge”. To this, the meditator raises a hypothesis that applies their belief in god: The meditator's detailed argument is as follows: P1. I firmly believe that there is an all-powerful god who created me. P2.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Argument For The Existence Of God

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Dreaming Argument Essay
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes Dreaming Argument Essay

    Rene Descartes work ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ is filled with his many ideas on God, the relationship between the mind and body and the trustworthiness of things we believe to be true. The main focus of this essay is his arguments for distrusting the senses. These are the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. Meditations begins with Descartes casting doubt on everything he once believed to be absolutely true. It is a search for absolute certainty.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Descartes Discourse On Method
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Descartes Discourse On Method

    In part four of Descartes’ Discourse on Method, the word ‘perfect’ is used numerous times. The excessive use of the word marks its importance in Descartes argument. This part of Descartes work contains Descartes’ thoughts on God and proof of God’s existence. He is exploring the idea of a perfect being, but the word ‘perfect’ seems to take on different meanings throughout the section of Descartes deliberating on what makes a perfect being. Perfect is used in relation to doubt, in relation to God, and in relation to truth.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Descartes Second Meditation Argument
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Second Meditation Argument

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Third Meditation Analysis
    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes Third Meditation Analysis

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Evil Deceiver Argument Descartes
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evil Deceiver Argument Descartes

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Criteria For Making Mistakes
    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes Criteria For Making Mistakes

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Aquinas And Descartes
    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Aquinas And Descartes

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critical Analysis Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings