It may be revealed as a revelation to some that the Democrats were the ones who took actions in an attempt to subdue communism in Cuba. This is predominantly due to the Republicans advertising their belief on warfare: it is imperative for a nation to epitomize its military. Furthermore, this notion is supported by the fact that Republicans, throughout history, had always been the commanding force that drives America to the battlefront. During the decades of 1940’s and 1960’s, United States and the Soviet Union partook in a social, political, and economic race to become the world’s superpower. Both nations made an effort to promote their systems of government: democracy and communism. This antagonism evidently prompted communism to spread to
…show more content…
According to Eleanor’s article, ”Differences Between Democrats and Republicans”, Republicans believe that the key to maintaining a successful nation is a dominant and organized military. This evidently supports the stereotype that Republicans are primarily warfare orientated. In addition, during the time of World War I, there were three consecutive Republican president: Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover. This is relevant, in a sense, that the citizens trusted that the Republicans will adhere to their principles of a strong military, and guide America to a prosperous future. Furthermore, the article also states that Republican invest millions more than Democrats do in military and deplore any laws and regulations that decreases these spendings. Correspondingly, this action magnifies the public’s perception of their militarial beliefs: they are willing to invest innumerable amounts of money to protect the United States. Moreover, the article, “Republican Views on The Military”, claims …show more content…
This misconception is mainly credited to the fact that the parties would always adhere to their set of standards, which in fact, is invalid. Their social, economic, political, and military aspects appear to intertwine as they adjust to the current necessities during that time. According to the article, “ Democrats and Republicans Switch Platforms” by Thomas DeMichele, during times of warfare and civil conflicts, the parties would adopt a different mindset for the welfare of their citizens. This is relevant due to the reason that Kennedy recognized that Cuba was becoming problem and decided to take action. He initiated an offensive move, even though it contradicted the stereotypes, that attempted to contain communism and hinder its ability to spread to the United States. This shows the process of adoption of a different “mindset” that the article mentions; Kennedy broke the norm that Democrats are known for and proved to the citizens that his political party can be prominent supporter of national defense. Moreover, the online source, Ontheissues.org states “The Democratic Party will make sure that the military has the most advanced weaponry, sophisticated intelligence, and information systems and, in addition, continues to invest in research and development for future supremacy.”, which reveals that Democrats still certainly believe in these sets of values.
According to Eleanor’s article, ”Differences Between Democrats and Republicans”, Republicans believe that the key to maintaining a successful nation is a dominant and organized military. This evidently supports the stereotype that Republicans are primarily warfare orientated. In addition, during the time of World War I, there were three consecutive Republican president: Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover. This is relevant, in a sense, that the citizens trusted that the Republicans will adhere to their principles of a strong military, and guide America to a prosperous future. Furthermore, the article also states that Republican invest millions more than Democrats do in military and deplore any laws and regulations that decreases these spendings. Correspondingly, this action magnifies the public’s perception of their militarial beliefs: they are willing to invest innumerable amounts of money to protect the United States. Moreover, the article, “Republican Views on The Military”, claims …show more content…
This misconception is mainly credited to the fact that the parties would always adhere to their set of standards, which in fact, is invalid. Their social, economic, political, and military aspects appear to intertwine as they adjust to the current necessities during that time. According to the article, “ Democrats and Republicans Switch Platforms” by Thomas DeMichele, during times of warfare and civil conflicts, the parties would adopt a different mindset for the welfare of their citizens. This is relevant due to the reason that Kennedy recognized that Cuba was becoming problem and decided to take action. He initiated an offensive move, even though it contradicted the stereotypes, that attempted to contain communism and hinder its ability to spread to the United States. This shows the process of adoption of a different “mindset” that the article mentions; Kennedy broke the norm that Democrats are known for and proved to the citizens that his political party can be prominent supporter of national defense. Moreover, the online source, Ontheissues.org states “The Democratic Party will make sure that the military has the most advanced weaponry, sophisticated intelligence, and information systems and, in addition, continues to invest in research and development for future supremacy.”, which reveals that Democrats still certainly believe in these sets of values.