Democrats Vs Federalists Essay

Improved Essays
New governments often have rocky starts, and America’s was no exception. The original political parties in America, the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists, didn’t agree on a lot of things - like the topic of who should be allowed to rule, the wealthy class or the common people. The Democratic-Republicans probably shared beliefs with a lot of us today on this topic. They wanted the power to rule, and to vote, to be given to all people, including common, ordinary, uneducated, poor, illiterate civilians. “The Republicans feared a strong, central government controlled by a few people.” (The American Journey). A large part of this fear came from the idea of basically another England, a monarchy or a dictatorship. They didn’t want the upper class to rule the country, or the lower class to be without representation. They also believed that “liberty would only be safe if ordinary people participated in government.” (The American Journey) Once again, if the ruling class …show more content…
The Federalists didn’t believe that the public/lower class should have an important role in politics. “‘The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.’ - Alexander Hamilton.” (The American Journey) They thought that in general people were uninformed and ignorant, and ignorant people make bad decisions based on their emotions and thoughts at the time. “Public office, Federalists thought, should be held by honest and educated men who own property and would protect everyone’s rights.” (The American Journey) Federalists believed that the educated had the experience to protect the rights of everyone - even the poorer classes, and even when the results wouldn't benefit themselves. “He [Alexander Hamilton] considered ‘common people’ to be ignorant and incapable of self-government. He believed that the elite should rule, so there should be higher voting qualifications.”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    American citizens have always questioned their central government. We were in a war and trying to ratify one of the most important documents to this day, the Constitution. Also, over the years, our nation wrote ment documents, constitutions, papers, and other things that contributed to our central government. During the time of 1754 to 1789, there were a lot of americans who didn't like a strong central government as shown in the the Albany plan, Articles of confederation, and the Anti Federalist.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Foner’s (2010) “Founding a Nation, 1783-1791,” describes the events that led to the formation of a strong central government and the creation of the US Constitution in 1787. Shay’s Rebellion brought out the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which gave the federal government very limited powers when it came to raising funds to provide for the general defense of the states. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government did not have the ability to raise funds for the national army through taxation. Rather, it relied upon voluntary contributions from the states. Shay’s Rebellion occurred as a result of sudden tax increases in the state of Massachusetts to pay off state debts and the absence of a national army.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the time John Adam’s presidency came to an end in 1800, two political parties surfaced with contradicting interpretations of the United States Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Federalists had a loose interpretation. However, there beliefs were not always completely enforced by either party. In the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican came to office. Although Democratic-Republicans presented themselves as “the guardians of agrarian purity, liberty, and states rights,” the occasionally shifted their beliefs if they thought it would benefit the United States.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the years of 1801-1817 two separate parties had formed, the Jeffersonian Republicans (Democrats) and the Federalists, who feuded bitterly in the political world. The Democratic Party remained firm during Jefferson 's presidency, however, began to conform to the Federalists when Madison was president; likewise, Federalists stubbornly held onto their views, but compromised to the stricter views of Democrats when Jefferson was in power. Jefferson became president in 1801 and began the reign of the strict Democratic party, forcing Federalists to conform to their stringent views. Jefferson made attempts to unify the Federalists and Democrats, stating: “We are all republicans” in order to increase the unity of America and gain approval from…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the eleven years before the Constitution was created, the Founding Fathers learned that they needed a strong national government, where a handful of people held all the power and did what they thought was best for the people, justly ruling with total control. Before the Constitution, the national Congress “did not have the powers to levy and collect taxes, or regulate trade and commerce between the states” (Text, 54). This meant that the government had no source for the money it needed and no way of controlling the actions of the people. Alexander Hamilton believed that “the only way to fix the growing problems of the new nation was to implement a strong national government designed to protect property and civil liberties from the state…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists were mainly elitists, and cared more about making money and power than about the working class. There was a disconnect between the two groups, and the Sedition Act only proved that further. The act was specifically negative for the working class and agriculturalists that generally did not agree with the Federalists. They legally could not fight back against policies that benefited the elite but hurt them, as their freedom of speech was unlawfully taken away. They feared that the government was becoming tyrannical and…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Radical Republican in congress set forth laws and Constitutional Amendments to protect the civil and political right to black men. Even though African American men began voting in the south shortly after 1867, the majority of the north states denied them of this basic right. This seemed to be a push for equal rights at the time for black male suffrage; however, the underlying truth was that the Republican votes were declining in the north, and they feared they would lose control of the Congress to the…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of political parties can be dated back to the pre-revolutionary Whigs and Tories that arrived to the colonies from Great Britain. As the need for a division in politics subsided, these parties became less official factions. However, when the issues of the territory began to change, the presence of factions began to change. The evolution of factions into rivaling political parties in the 1790s resulted from contrasting views between Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans and Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists due to different beliefs in regards to the Constitution’s power and the impact of foreign policy and economic growth on the young United States.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist Party

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist Party In the wake of the early beginnings of America, many agendas clamored for attention as to the direction the nation should take, and the Federalist Party played a major part. One of the formidable political parties of its time, Federalist Party ideologies were largely elitist. For Federalists, the defining characteristic was their championship for a stronger central government, with the view that it would lead to a more powerful nation. As a party, Federalists generally frowned upon democracy as they thought it would give the opportunity for poor leadership to arise in states.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays