Nast's Cartoon Analysis

Improved Essays
According to Stephens’ cornerstone is that there are still unequal rights between the
Negro and the whites. Even through, it was thought that the enslaver would change under the new government. In the new government, slavery still exists and the Negros does not have the same right as the whites.The beliefs between the Negros and whites have not changes in the new government as well. Stephens was the Vice President of the confederate states during the civil war era.
The fundamental assumptions were wrong, the premise was supposed to be treated as equal rights regardless of the nationality. If the new government premise was right then their conclusion about Negros having equal rights as the white man would be right. Instead, their
…show more content…
Most of the people in the south were afraid of him because of his power and for their resources. The south was not at peace.
Slavery was still going on in the south. The cartoon was to fear in the southern to destroy their hopes. Lincoln thought the cartoon with the swords was a sign to the enemy to defeat their

success. Before Lincoln’s election he was for slave trade, which fears the Southerners. The fears for the southerners lay the secession for the United States Republic. The southerners were not at peace instead, the northerners were at peace. During the civil war the Confederated states was united together among the southern and Lincoln. More so, Lincoln aimed toward the southern to cease the ambitious to disaffiliate from gaining success.
The southern was considered as slave in the south. The slaves were workers that were known as slaveholders and their attitude was malicious toward Lincoln. From Lincoln actions about the slaves made the slaves bitter. Also, Lincoln wanted control and he demolition the slave’s accomplishment. Lincoln intention was to gain power from the slaves, and the slave’s views were powerless. During 1891, slave’s duties from the masters were to take orders

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Expansion Of Slavery

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between the years 1846 to 1861, the United States government was in a constant argument over the idea of the expansion of slavery. The southern politicians perceived the decisions made by Congress a retaliation against the southern need to expand slavery, so their economy does not collapse due to soil degradation. The north saw the tactics used by the south as rebellious to the American form of government. Northern politicians believed the south was trying to take over the government by nationalizing slavery and corrupting the government itself. Both the southern and northern politicians began to use their passion to validate their fears about the other party.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Northerners wanted to abolish it but Southerners on the other hand, strongly agreed to slavery. They felt that slavery was making America prosper, so why should they stop? The South was making money from selling cotton that the slaves picked but the people up North didn’t like the way slave owners were making money from African Americans being enslaved. When Abraham Lincoln became president, the South felt that their right being a slave state was in danger. Their differences on slavery caused the Civil War.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1800’s, the constitution was suppose to establish America as one nation, but instead the constitution created sectional discord and tension and contributed to the failure of the Union. Slavery in the 1800’s was exceedingly cruel, African Americans were thought of as property, were not allowed to have rights,were kept in horrendous living conditions and were treated unfairly. Sectionalism, when one’s views are based on where they are from, divided America into two sections, the north who opposed slavery and the south who supported slavery. Citizens were typically proud of where they were from and stayed loyal to their region. The American Government questioned if slavery should have been deemed unconstitutional in the Constitution,…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Southern Mindset: An Analysis of the Threat of a Race War, Racial Equality, and Abolitionist Sabotage in the Causation of the Civil War The primary causes for the Civil War will be defined through the perceived threat of a race war, the dissolution of the Southern plantation aristocracy, and abolitionist sabotage in the South. In the South, many commissioners that discussed the possibility of secession were concerned about the liberation of African slaves, which might result in the extermination of the slave owning aristocracy. This deeply rooted fear was actually fomented by Thomas Jefferson, and other members of the southern aristocracy, that felt that liberating the slaves would result in a race war in the south: “A sudden emancipation,…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and James Madison wrote against having slavery in America. Madison, in The Federalist article 51, says that a civil society ends when a “stronger faction can readily unite and oppress the weaker.” When the weaker are “not secured against the violence of the stronger,” then “anarchy may as truly be said to reign.” If the people want to continue to have their liberty, then the government must protect the weak. The slaves are a perfect example of the weak. They have no rights and are being oppressed by white people. Anarchy was reigning during the creation of the Constitution because the Southern states were threatening secession if the government restricts slavery.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles B. Dew argued that he believed that the Civil War was over slavery. He presented evidence to why he believed that slavery was the primary focus. The Union wanted equality with the Union and for the Union to have power but, the Confederate states were a threat to the Union after they separated themselves from the United States. Dew stated that the Union wanted the Confederate to abandon slavery if that if they didn’t there would be a war and that is exactly what happened; a war. Gary W. Gallagher didn’t believe that the war was over slavery but, that the war was over the Union.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith). Even though, it gained little support the south viewed this as a preview as to what was going to come in the future if they did not surrender to the north. For putting Lincoln, in charge the blame for the start of the war laid on the Republican Party for they imposed conditions that could not be fulfilled. The south felt threatened and thought “the only way to save slavery was to secede” (Dickinson). The South cornered the Union to respond to a greater conflict on top of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is correct to say that the South is not alone in its sin against Blacks. The North was indeed responsible as well. However, as Tindall and Shi point out slavery was the main reason for war. They state, “To argue that the Civil War was primarily a defense of liberty and the right of self-government…ignores the actual reasons that southern leaders used in 1860–1861 to justify secession and war” (Tindall and Shi 497). The leaders of the south wanted to keep slavery and they went to war over it.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The south tried to say that slaves were happy, but educated, heartfelt attacks on slavery written by people like escaped-slave Frederick Douglass said otherwise. The treatment of slaves varied depending on the owner, but families of slaves being separated and punishments like whipping was common. Though the war may have started as a way to preserve the Union which was breaking after the election of an anti-slavery President, Abraham Lincoln, it turned into a war that would decide the fate of slavery (“Slavery in the United States” 2014). The desire for change is what caused the civil war. The people of the northern states recognized that slavery should not be legal while the southern states wanted to expand slavery to the west.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His election posed a threat to the people, whereby they felt that the government was overstepping their mandate by fighting for the rights of the slaves. The states did not like the way things were being run, and it was evident that Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery; Lincoln favors the northern states views on slavery by giving them a chance. Southern states were opposed that Lincoln interests was to support their idea of having slaves, but instead Lincoln went against them. For this reason, these states lost confidence in him and decided to start their states which they could be ruled the best way they knew how by a government of their choice. Abraham Lincoln was against the expansion of the use of slaves, and this irritated the southern states because they were pro-slavery and could not do without the…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays