Freedom Of Free Speech

Good Essays
Does national security override free speech? In the case of Snowden, Manning and Assange, they each leaked classified documents to the public under the name of free speech. Is this actually classified as free speech? According to J.S Mills, if it doesn’t cause physical harm to a populace, then it is classified as ‘free speech’ and so the leakage of government documents is allowed in accordance to Mills’ theory on free speech. Mills does not include psychological harm to anyone in his definition of free speech which also brings forth flaws in his definition of free speech. National security is defined as a defence and protection of a country from foreign countries. A government is obliged to protect the population of their country. Free speech …show more content…
It is protected by the first amendment to the constitution. With secrets kept from the public, it is possible to keep the citizens unaware of troubling matters that may otherwise harm their daily lives with the knowledge of it. Abraham Lincoln expressed his views as “Let the people be aware of the facts, and the country will be calm”, but, by knowing all the facts, is it possible that the populace would have been better off not knowing some aspects of truth? When threats to national security and the lives of many humans appear, the public is notified almost instantly within the timeframe of the announcement where as when the U.S. government is spying on its citizens, although illegal, they refuse to disclose the information and it may not be because it needs to be classified, but because it could be embarrassing if it was released from the government. Mills argued in On Liberty “...there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered.” In a democratic society, freedom of speech plays an important role. Freedom of speech guarantees the citizens to participate in the democracy, and a democratic society isn’t stable if there is no free speech in the administration sector. Restrictions on free speech may cause harm to democratic life, and also contradicts the principles that founded democracy, that the government shouldn’t impose any more than necessary restrictions on individual rights. In Australia, the constitution does not explicitly protect freedom of speech, however, there is meant to be an implied freedom of speech in the constitution. Freedom of speech is thought to be essential in a democratic society. The right to freedom of speech does not extend to free speech when political issues are not

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Still, Lee would point out that abridging means the exercise of prior restraint. The government can’t stop someone from publishing a malicious article, but the person can be punished after. However, to combat Lee’s argument Madison states that certain powers -enumerated powers- are given to the government, which is what they have total control over. There is no enumerated power in the Constitution for Congress to claim that they can control the press, therefore they shouldn’t be able to punish people even if it is after the article had already been published. In fact, the First Amendment added an express denial of any such power.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiretapping is an infringement of a person’s rights. The United States has the power to do this under the U.S. Patriot Act, but they actually are only allowed to monitor a conversation if they have a probable cause and a warrant. A great quote regarding NSA Wiretapping in relation to the Patriot Act comes from Dean Heller, a senator from Nevada. He said in a press release that “there is a fine line between protecting our nation and protecting our Fourth Amendment rights.” (Heller, 2013) This quote goes to show that while the nation should be protected, the government should not have the right to blatantly overlook the rights of the people of the country. The elastic clause was a major factor in the establishment of the Patriot Act.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Miller test uses community standards which imposes view of the majority onto views of the minority. This violates the spirit of a liberal reading of the First Amendment because it restricts content and therefore speech. Speech and individual liberty should be protected. Content should not be prohibited, especially when it is based on community standards because they are “unsupported by reasoning of any intelligible kind” and do not rise to the “dignity of moral reasoning that justifies the deprivation of liberty.” Richards also argues that pornography should not be prohibited because it has some redeeming values such as creating ideas that individuals may like, providing a release for individuals who may not have access to sexual partners, and it can also reduce the incidence of certain…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ch. 5 Civil Liberties

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Another type of speech is symbolic speech which is an act that conveys a political message. Even though the court reasoned the same protection as real speech woud open the door to permitting all manner of illegal actions if perpetrator meant thereby to send a message you can 't just ordinarily claim that an illegal act should be protected because that action is meant to convey a political message. An example of this could be Reno v. ACLU in 1997, a law that banned sending indecent material to minors over the internet because its unconstitutional and it was proved unconstitutional because “indecent” is too vague and broad a term. Many people know the language of the First Amendment though many are not aware of how complex the legal interpretations of these provisions have become. The First Amendment has two part and the first part know as the free-exercsie clause is a little more clearer than the second part but still very confusing.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Legal Positivism

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The separation thesis suggests that the law and morality are distinct in terms of conception. In this regard, the definition of law should be completely freed from moral ideals. Moreover moral considerations must not be included in the definition of legal terms such as legal validity, laws, and legal systems. Legal positivism suggests that there are no moral constraints on the validity of legal rules. The positivist community agrees that it is possible to have legal systems without moral constraints, but they do not agree on whether there are some legal systems that experience such moral constraints.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Surveillance empowers authorities to expand the range of their powers, leading to further rights violations (Greenwald 14). Because the state does not face backlash or repercussions, the government can take advantage of this passivity and expand their territorial powers. The expansion of state power only happens when the public does not take an active stance in having a say about the NSA, especially since the secretive FISA courts passed legislation about the NSA long before the public knew. People under the control of surveillance avoid certain political views and beliefs which is yet another mechanism of governmental control. The NSA diminishes the citizens’ voice by not allowing them to convey their opinions on these matters.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mill makes several assumptions regarding the ability of society to rationally understand the difference of harmful and offensive. There is a grey area when it comes to differentiating what is considered to be practising one’s freedom of speech or being offensive to those around them. Since there is no concrete definition on what can be considered to be ‘freedom of speech’, John Stuart Mill, author of On Liberty focuses on prohibiting the government from limiting freedom of speech and allowing citizens to have no limitations on their speech under the exception of harming others.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His standpoint is that the government should not interfere with people’s lives unless it is to prevent harm to another person. He sees this as the only time the government can legitimately interfere with an individual’s liberty. Mill believes people should have the freedom to do whatever actions they wish to themselves when he states “His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.” (Mill, 13). Mill does not view something as extreme as an individual harming themselves as grounds for the government to restrict a person’s liberty. This argument from Mill is conflictive with present day society with many laws in place to protect individuals from harming themselves.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is an important when human rights are being considered because with issues of national security can often lead to improper treatment of minorities and foreign nationals. The judiciary is best not to defer to Parliament on matters of national security as Lucia Zedner explains that with “judicial protestations of deference to ‘ministerial responsibility’, in practice it is the executive that makes most controversial decisions regarding security. Whatever deference judges owe ministers can hardly be said to extend to civil servants .” Since neither the judges nor civil servants are elected to office, judges…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    OPINION In the essay presented by Isaiah Berlin who argues in favour of negative freedom , in my opinion the concept of negative liberty has been tactfully interpreted so as to avoid it from losing the debate between positive and negative liberty. It is wrong of Berlin to suggest one can be free if the agent is not impeded by any physical obstacle, but that real freedom is both internal and external. I feel that those who defend the positive notion do not want to force others into our way of life, but simply to help others realize themselves so they can best utilize their negative freedom. These two concepts are not incompatible, but positive liberty goes beyond the goal of negative to argue that there must be more than just leaving people alone for them to truly be free. Therefore, I reject the notion that negative freedom is the ‘truer’ form.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays