The Case Against Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide

Improved Essays
“Every individual matters. Every individual has a role to play. Every individual makes a difference”—Jane Goodball. No one should life for granted. Life and death is in hands of god, he decides our arrival time and departure time. Assisted Suicide is an inevitable topic. There are only four countries that have legalized assisted suicide, so clearly government does not want people to kill themselves and give up and so do I. I do not agree with the fact that people should suicide to end all their agony. People should learn to fight against their problems and never lose hope. Therefore, the US government should not pass a law legalizing physician-assisted suicide because doctors are supposed to heal not harm, suicide is a selfish move and risk …show more content…
On one hand, there are some deadly diseases and on the other hand there are actually cures to many of them, at least we can hope for it. In the article, “In Defense of Voluntary Euthanasia” by Sidney Hook, an octogenarian shares his experience of taking the risk and coming back to life. He was on deathbed but he beat the death simply because his doctor took the risk of saving his life instead of giving him lethal drugs. He was going through congestive heart failure. “In one of my lucid intervals, during those days of agony, I asked my physician to discontinue all life supporting services or show me how to do it. He refused and told me that someday I would appreciate the unwisdom of my request” (243). This is evidence where the doctor was not less than an angel who did not lose hope and took the risk of saving his patient and bringing him back from the point where all his hope was gone and he simply wanted to end his life and free himself from all the pain. Not only that, by taking the risk he got more time to see smiles on his family’s faces who have been in grief since the time he was in hospital. Saying no to death and yes to life gave him more time to enjoy his life a little

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should Physicians-Assisted Suicide be allowed in the United States? Many patients and doctors around the country have debated the right for physicians to assist in patient suicide. Doctors should be allowed to assist in the suicide of terminally ill patients who are suffering and are going to die regardless of the time they have left. Patients should be allowed the right to choose to live or die when cancer or some genetic disease has taken over their body.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human beings everywhere experience pain, suffering, and ultimately death. Many people are considered fortunate when they undergo a quick, relatively painless death, such as when they die in their sleep. However, others endure agonizing pain over a long period of time before dying. There is an ongoing debate over whether it is permissible to end these people’s lives if they have no hope of improving their conditions or have no desire to continue fighting their symptoms.…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the public put themselves in the shoes of the patient and actually experienced what the patient was feeling, their view would change dramatically and support for physician-assisted suicide would most likely rise. If the patient does not want to endure the pain of their illness any longer, and there is not any medication that can ease their pain, they should not be forced to experience it any…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dying topic, the decision that families or designated surrogates are left to make when a loved one is in a vegetative state and is being kept alive on life support. This decision is made after considering discussions with the attending physician, priest, and family or friend. There is also the consideration of a physician-assisted suicide, which provides a mean for the terminally ill patients to take their own life. Some may argue this physician-assisted suicide is a form of killing and is wrong in the eyes of many people, (Kaebnick, G. 2017). Physician-assisted suicide is legal in some state such as Oregon and Washington.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans are taught from an early age that everyone is born with certain unalienable rights. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are characterized as legal truths that cannot be taken away or denied. However, one must wonder if the right to life coincides with the right to die. This is the very question that has sparked controversy all throughout the nation regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS). To clarify, the right to die is a person’s decision to end their life with the medical help and guidance from their doctor.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a huge conversation right now due to terminally ill patients wanting the option to end their lives. The patients, who will eventually die from their disease, deserve the option to die where they want and when they want. Terminally ill patients are moving from one state to another so they receive a certain drug that will eventually take their lives. In my opinion, I think this offer should not only be offered to terminally ill patients but those who are suffering from a mental illness that changes who they are. Patients with certain illnesses should be able to end their suffering through physician assisted suicide.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversy of Physician Assisted Suicide According to the Constitution every person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The statement means no one needs permission to live and each person has the right to do what make him or her happy even if it means dying (Bowden 36). There are many people throughout the United States that believe Physician Assisted Suicide is wrong, however, there are also many people who believe it is a human right. The controversy of PAS can be understood by learning what it is and where it occurs, why it should be legal, and why it should not be legal.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, doctors and patients are pushing the limits of healthcare spending in hopes that medical technology will catch up to Western societies’ desire to extend life indefinitely. Indeed, medical technology has extended life, but without removing those factors which cause physical death. Therefore, where the goal of medical science remains making death an option,…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide should not be legalized because many individuals are losing hope and it is affecting the community as suicide rates have gone up, however many people are for it since it will end all suffering; moreover to prevent suicide rates to continue to rise, PAS should not be…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This made others believe that physician assisted death is the correct and most ethical method to avoid suffering and pain instead of other options such as palliative…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Why can’t I get the treatment I want?” (Newman, 1996). Severely ill patients will be able to die with dignity and honor rather than waiting for their sickness to consume every part of them. Forbidding someone who is terminally ill and is suffer gives that patient a feeling of being trapped in agony and their…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the many ethical dilemmas surrounding health care today is physician assisted suicide. Many will misinterpret this as Euthanasia because they both accomplish the same goal, causing the death of a person. However, physician assisted suicide is different because of the way that death is accomplished. Boudreau and Somerville (2014) explain that, “In assisted suicide, the person takes the death-inducing product; in euthanasia, another individual administers it” (p. 2). The physician in the case of physician assisted suicide is removed from the actual act of death.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics