David Bruck And The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the death penalty as “execution imposed in court of law as punishment for a crime.” Edward I. Koch, a New York mayor from 1978-1989, supports the death penalty while David Bruck, Harvard College alumni, opposes the death penalty. In the essay “The Death Penalty: Is It Ever Justified?” and “The Death Penalty” both Koch and Bruck talk about the death penalty, yet they both argue the value of life very differently by elaborating their points of view.
Imagine a life where there was no existence of any type of crime. Sadly, we live in a life where crime exists and sometimes we can do something about it and sometimes we cannot. People like Koch and Bruck view justice differently, because Koch states; “We may
…show more content…
As he states; “Some critics of capital punishment, such as columnist Jimmy Breslin, have suggested that a life sentence is actually a harsher penalty for murder than death.’ This is sophistic nonsense” (Koch 486). Koch disagrees with Jimmy Breslin, because he is not convinced that a life sentence in prison is harsher than an execution. While Koch sees a person convicted for murder being executed, Bruck’s idea is to make sure that the convicted murderer has proof of either being guilty or innocent. Bruck believes that it is important to know because there have been cases where innocent people have been executed before. An example of an innocent person who was almost executed was Lenell Jeter. Lenell Jeter was a young black engineer who recently served more than a year of a life sentence for a Texas armed robbery that he didn’t commit. (Bruck 491). This piece of evidence from Bruck’s essay helps to understand that there have been situations where they punish the wrong person. Bruck states, “I don’t claim that executions of entirely innocent people will occur very often. But they will occur” (Bruck 495). Bruck wants assurance that if the death penalty is going to put to action, to at least be sure that the person being convicted of the crime is truly guilty.
Imagine all those people who were executed and were innocent. Like Koch and Bruck, justice should be equal for all, but in Bruck’s defense, justice wouldn’t be equal for all if innocent people were killed for a crime they did not commit and the sad part is that you can’t fix it because they would be already

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People executed or put on death row, in my opinion, are only put there as revenge for the victim. The execution is not justifying the convicted criminal’s actions, but rather the execution is only “retribution” for the crime they committed. When considering the survey in 2010, most people are against the death penalty, and even the families of the victim(s) say they would rather not have the pain and guilt of murdering another human being. If the family of a victim would rather have the criminal imprisoned, then why doesn’t the government feel the same way? There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They seem to believe in an eye for an eye justice. However, in my opinion, killing people can never be a humane act. Besides this, it is not always certain that all the convicted criminals are actually guilty. Some innocent people might get executed for the crimes they never did due to lack of proper evidences. If life imprisonment is practiced instead of the death penalty, such innocent people can be freed whenever their innocence is…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this reactionary type of system, American judges often use the death penalty for crime that do not warrant such a horrific penalty. In some cases, it is has been found that criminals charged with murder and sentenced to death may have been innocent. After they are put to the death, there is retrial or process in which to free them from being wrongly accused. In Reiman’s moderate theory of retribution, the judges and legal officials involved in passing a death penalty should also be punished for abusing this form of punishment without absolute proof of the criminal’s conscious intent of committing the…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of capital punishment, one controversial issue has been whether or not the death penalty benefits the states that enforce capital punishment. On the one hand, those who oppose the death penalty argues that capital punishment is inhumane and should not be used to end someone’s life. On the other hand, those in favor of capital punishment firmly believe that the death penalty is the only way to make the world just. My own view is: the death penalty gives life value and justice; it helps reduce prison crowding, and ensures public safety. Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I honestly do not full heartedly support the death penalty, but I think there are rare cases in which it would be just and in the best interest of the safety of the general public. Justice can be defined as being “fair, impartial, [and] giving a deserved response” (“List of the Virtues”). If the trial for the crime is fairly administered, and we are certain with no doubt that the person on death row is guilty, the death penalty ought to be justified. Not every crime or even murder mandates the use of capital punishment. However, if the just punishment for the crime is the death penalty, the executioner and those involved in the conviction could still be considered virtuous because they are being just.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, in Stephen Nathanson’s writing “An for an Eye”, he suggests the second stage is the death penalty in practice. Nathanson believes the death penalty is completely justified, but in most cases it could be unjustified in practice. Legal judiciaries that impose the death penalty are not the ones leading to the execution of innocent humans. Nathanson also suggested the death penalty is inconsistent with the value of justice in society specifically. Nathanson’s argument is inconsistent with the value of justice, because the death penalty was imposed due to the extent of the specific crimes committed.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Contrary to Meehan’s view, the death penalty deters crime. While there is no way to bring victims back from the dead, the death penalty gives justice to the victim’s family. When potential criminals know they might be put to death for a crime, they will be more hesitant than if though punishment were less severs. The death penalty makes sense as a consequence for crimes, like murder, where the victims’ families must live with the horrors of being attacked. Allowing their attackers to go free after just a few years is hardly justice.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indisputably, the death penalty is only warranted for limited reasons such as mass murderers, serial killers, and the killers of children and the elderly. The first type of murderer who deserves to be on death row is the killer of numerous people all at one time. It is hard to fathom that such a person would do something so terrible to innocent lives. Edward Koch, former mayor of New York, states, “when we protect guilty lives, we give up innocent lives in exchange” (487). Koch’s point could not be more true because, if we fail to put someone on death row for mass murder the we do not avenge the innocent lives that were taken.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Death Penalty

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are those who say that the innocence factor can make the Death Penalty, an irreversible but effective, punishment much too dangerous to be used. For the safety of those prisoners who might perhaps be innocent. (Dieter) The people who disagree with the Death Penalty because of the chance that an innocent claim that: “The danger that innocent people will be executed because of errors in the criminal justice system is getting worse. A total of 69 people have been released from death row since 1973 after evidence of their innocence emerged. Twenty-one condemned inmates have been released since 1993, including seven from the state of Illinois alone.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Our justice shows more sympathy for the criminals than it does victims” (source 1). When a criminal is put in prison for murder does not mean that out justice has more sympathy for the criminal than the victims. The judge or police officers can not bring back the victims and if they could, they would. Its kind of like telling someone “famous” to go die, when in reality they were put in this world for a reason. So with that said criminals were put in the world for a reason, it may not have been to kill someone maybe it was to learn while they were in prison that it was…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics