Unlimited Possibilities of Free Speech
The free right of expressing one’s thought and opinions is very important according to human rights for a country. Everyone might be able to speak and write with freedom, but could be responsible for such extremely negative or dangerous way of using freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is very important part for democratic government and most people because it is the only way the truth can come out. Everybody is different. Everybody has their own opinions, thoughts and beliefs that do not necessarily coincide with the other person’s. Should one person’s beliefs or idea prohibited because someone else is offended? Since it has both negative and positive effects it should be done carefully. It should not be limited if it is used for …show more content…
Freedom of speech should not be restricted when it comes to peaceful protest. Peaceful protest have a very good advantage that would bring an issue to light. Countries like Eritrea (East Africa) are not allowed to have protest against the government because the government is dictatorial. “In an interview with VOA 's English to Africa service Thursday in the capital, Asmara, President Isaias said his government is not interested in keeping people from expressing their views, but that he will do what is necessary to "protect national security" in the face of what he calls "external aggression" by those who take money from outside governments to create chaos and spread misinformation’’(Stifling 2012). If there is no freedom of speech it can be very dangerous for the whole country. For example, in Eritrea there were fifteen ministers that are known to be called the G 15; one time they discussed that election for president should be made because the president is still on the power for the twenty fiftieth years. The president put all of
The free right of expressing one’s thought and opinions is very important according to human rights for a country. Everyone might be able to speak and write with freedom, but could be responsible for such extremely negative or dangerous way of using freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is very important part for democratic government and most people because it is the only way the truth can come out. Everybody is different. Everybody has their own opinions, thoughts and beliefs that do not necessarily coincide with the other person’s. Should one person’s beliefs or idea prohibited because someone else is offended? Since it has both negative and positive effects it should be done carefully. It should not be limited if it is used for …show more content…
Freedom of speech should not be restricted when it comes to peaceful protest. Peaceful protest have a very good advantage that would bring an issue to light. Countries like Eritrea (East Africa) are not allowed to have protest against the government because the government is dictatorial. “In an interview with VOA 's English to Africa service Thursday in the capital, Asmara, President Isaias said his government is not interested in keeping people from expressing their views, but that he will do what is necessary to "protect national security" in the face of what he calls "external aggression" by those who take money from outside governments to create chaos and spread misinformation’’(Stifling 2012). If there is no freedom of speech it can be very dangerous for the whole country. For example, in Eritrea there were fifteen ministers that are known to be called the G 15; one time they discussed that election for president should be made because the president is still on the power for the twenty fiftieth years. The president put all of