Essay about Cultural Relativism And Moral Values

1695 Words Oct 6th, 2016 7 Pages
Cultural relativism enables moral differences between cultures to be all acceptable and right depending on context. This means that moral concepts can come across as morally wrong for a group in one context and pass as morally right for another in other contexts. Though I recognize the relevance of cultural relativism in establishing that it is possible to have some variations in the frameworks of truth, I believe that the truth about morality is absolute and cannot be too broadly interpreted. Morality, by definition, cannot be relative or dependent on context because the purpose of moral concepts is to help an individual or society distinguish between what is ethically wrong and what is ethically right. Hence, they must be upheld in the same way and in all situations, regardless of the situation. Strictly speaking, if morals are put into context and their ethical nature can fluctuate between right and wrong from one place to the next, they are no longer considered to be morals, but rather subjective moral opinions. Moral values are the essential elements in shaping the character of a person and the civility of a just society. Morality must be objectively defined and applicable to all cases at all times in order for ethical judgments to hold true universally. It is common for many to identify with the ideas of cultural relativism, especially in its advocacy for neutrality in judgment. Personal judgments are relative in the sense that they can vary depending on the…

Related Documents