A plan of action intended to address an issue can initially appear to be absolute. It may be feasible, based on pertinent research, and conform to the objectives of the organization. However, even a seemingly “model” plan can prove to be deficient once it is implemented. Some of the activities of the criminal justice system are indicative of the reality that a solid idea cannot only be ineffective upon application, but it can potentially exacerbate a problem. For example, with a growing crime rate and the heightened prevalence rate of drugs, it was determined that a “get-tough” approach to crime was needed to control the situation. Thus, increasingly stringent sentencing was dispensed such as the “Three-strikes” law and heftier penalties for
…show more content…
Essentially, it could work in his favor by better articulating how the benefits of his initiative outweigh the costs and attempt to alleviate the assistant commissioner’s concerns. Therefore, given the circumstances of the situation, the use of a cost-benefit analysis would be highly appropriate. Steve could highlight the tangible and intangible benefits and costs that would be generated. Tangible costs and benefits are those which can be quantified while intangible costs and benefits cannot be readily appraised (Starling, 2011, p. 261). The gains that can be accrued by sanctioning Steve’s method are vast. For example, by investing in database valuable man hours will not be wasted by responding to an inordinate amount of complaints and will avoid losing the business of commuters. In addition, uniting with other agencies can establish a connection that can result in a mutually-beneficial relationship. The functioning of agencies as isolated entities had a created divide that impeded upon operations. Thus, by consolidating the data of multiple agencies it would be a means of linking organizations as well as increase productivity. Most importantly, the department must prioritize the best interest of the public above all else, which in that context, would support the use of the
Essentially, it could work in his favor by better articulating how the benefits of his initiative outweigh the costs and attempt to alleviate the assistant commissioner’s concerns. Therefore, given the circumstances of the situation, the use of a cost-benefit analysis would be highly appropriate. Steve could highlight the tangible and intangible benefits and costs that would be generated. Tangible costs and benefits are those which can be quantified while intangible costs and benefits cannot be readily appraised (Starling, 2011, p. 261). The gains that can be accrued by sanctioning Steve’s method are vast. For example, by investing in database valuable man hours will not be wasted by responding to an inordinate amount of complaints and will avoid losing the business of commuters. In addition, uniting with other agencies can establish a connection that can result in a mutually-beneficial relationship. The functioning of agencies as isolated entities had a created divide that impeded upon operations. Thus, by consolidating the data of multiple agencies it would be a means of linking organizations as well as increase productivity. Most importantly, the department must prioritize the best interest of the public above all else, which in that context, would support the use of the