There are many debates today filled with high tensions regarding key issues, but rarely is it ever suggested that Americans make a Constitutional amendment to settle the issue once and for all. While it's obviously not a good idea to make an amendment for every single policy decision, we should really consider the purpose of making an amendment. Simply put if the citizenry feels that something ought to be allowed or disallowed, but the Constitution conflicts with that consensus (or can't be said to affirm it), then an amendment should potentially be purposed. In the years succeeding the American Civil War, two amendments were purposed to do just that. But if citizens today view the Constitution as an unfallible document which needs to be upheld without question, then is there room for more amendments? And if not, then perhaps the Constitution (and by extension, the Bill of Rights) isn't truly living at all. In the end, however, I feel that it would be too rash to come to those conclusions. We had 12 amendments in the 20th century - and while the last amendment to the US constitution was over 40 years ago (aside from a 1992 amendment regarding Congressional salaries) it's still too short a time in historical terms to condemn the "living" status of the
There are many debates today filled with high tensions regarding key issues, but rarely is it ever suggested that Americans make a Constitutional amendment to settle the issue once and for all. While it's obviously not a good idea to make an amendment for every single policy decision, we should really consider the purpose of making an amendment. Simply put if the citizenry feels that something ought to be allowed or disallowed, but the Constitution conflicts with that consensus (or can't be said to affirm it), then an amendment should potentially be purposed. In the years succeeding the American Civil War, two amendments were purposed to do just that. But if citizens today view the Constitution as an unfallible document which needs to be upheld without question, then is there room for more amendments? And if not, then perhaps the Constitution (and by extension, the Bill of Rights) isn't truly living at all. In the end, however, I feel that it would be too rash to come to those conclusions. We had 12 amendments in the 20th century - and while the last amendment to the US constitution was over 40 years ago (aside from a 1992 amendment regarding Congressional salaries) it's still too short a time in historical terms to condemn the "living" status of the