Conformity Of Allegory In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

Superior Essays
Arthur Miller’s theatrical allegory play The Crucible (1953), represents the individual political situations and ideas arising from the democratic Salem community; regarding to the complexity of societal pressure to conform, the power struggle amongst individuals and personal integrity that are influenced by the corrupt social justice system and the community’s moral values through the conformity of theocracy. The ideas delivered from his play challenges the Communist fears by paralleling Cold War paranoia with the Salem witch trials to provoke criticism of Senator McCarthy’s actions.

Miller represents the complexity of societal pressure to conform, by revealing a community constrained by Parris and Abigail; whom symbolises selfish initiators
…show more content…
The reflection of hysteria and false accusations that characterised the McCarthy era is illustrated in the stage directions of ‘Goody Osbourne - will hang! [there is a shocked pause, while she sobs]’ this allows Proctor to reflect on his inaction and his refusal to get involved with Salem politics as he denies to conform to the political desires of an autocratic institution.It is also ironic for the condemenation, as justice has been subverted where it is guilty before proven innocent. This challenges the values of ethics, honesty and loyalty. Miller’s political perspective of the desire for an upstanding moral figure within the McCarthy era, becomes evident through his representation of Proctor, as he voices the corrupted Salem town in the diction of ‘I never knew until tonight that the world is gone daft with this nonsense’, Here, Proctor sees the witch hunt for what it truly is, and is not afraid of criticising the Salem authorities. At the end of Act two on a climax, Miller has used tension as epitomised in the stage direction where ‘Proctor [grasping her (Mary) by the throat as though he would strangle her]: Make your peace with it! Now Hell and Heaven grapple on our backs, and all our old pretence is ripped away- make your peace!’ brings forth the notion of personal integrity.The religious allusion to punishment in Hell symbolises Proctor as a person that is consistent with his integrity, without fear and an individual who is against the corrupted system established upon false premises. Juxtaposed with the stage direction that reveals Mary’s disturbing reaction ‘[He throws her to the floor, where she sobs, I cannot, I cannot]’ implies that this personal integrity comes with a price; that is the sacrifice of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Reverend Hale and John Proctor Written in the 1950s, Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible delineates the situation of the McCarthyism conflicts in America while the plays’ events itself revolve around the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692. In the play, two major characters are Reverend Hale, an “expert on witches” sent to Salem for investigation, and John Proctor, a man known for his leadership and hard work. Proctor and Hale, other than both being Puritans, are alike in their actions and motives since they both see the depravity of the court and seek to protect people from it. However, they have major differences in their character as they have contrasting dedication to Christianity and the values that they live by. John Proctor and Reverend Hale…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Crucible there is a group of girls that go into to woods with intentions of speaking to the devil. The major instigator to the Salem witch trials was Abigail Williams, she accused many of witchcraft and caused many to be hung. Abigail was a maid to John and Elizabeth Proctor. In the Crucible, Abigail and John had an affair, because of this Elizabeth fired Abigail. Abigail is in love with John Proctor and wants him to leave his wife to be with her, so Abigail goes in the woods to summon spirits to kill Elizabeth Proctor.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crucible- who’s the blame The Crucible, by Arthur Miller was a play that dealt with many false trials in Salem, Massachusetts that condemned many innocent beings to death, leading the country to its first severe trial. These trails are performed to drive Satan out of Salem so that Satan could not corrupt more of God’s children . Arthur Miller created this play to show how similar it was to the Red Scare. During the 1950’s the government tried to drive out communist in our country, just like in the play where the higher government tried to rule out the Salem witches. In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, Miller demonstrated that it was John Proctor’s flaw, lust and pride that led him to be most responsible for the tragedies that happened…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crucible’s Blind Truth Arthur Miller’s portrayal of mass hysteria accurately depicts the enormity of unjudicial falsehoods from a communal perspective. The Crucible’s setting is in the small town of Salem, Massachusetts in 1692 when the controversial witch trials occurred. Parallel similarities arise to the way in which the Red Scare affected the people of the 1950s. Many of which became fully blind to truth of who was at fault for this mass hysteria. In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, Elizabeth Proctor, Judge Danforth, and Abigail Williams are largely blind to the truth that holds them back from achieving true justice.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sebastian Khaloghli Mrs. Allen Period 3 English Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible displays the hysteria that took place in Salem in 1692. Although the act is fiction, Miller established the plot of his play on historical events and his characters show how fear and paranoia can amplify into something beyond its might. A number of characters used this fear to perk and they showed selfishness and impropriety. The two most contemptible characters in the play were Rev. Parris and Judge Danforth.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miller claims that the American society has lost sight of all that is meaningful by tearing other people down instead of uniting together in this time of hysteria. This rhetorical question evokes a sense of pathos in the audience by stating how those in the communist crisis of the 1950’s allowed for something insignificant such as the paranoia, get the best of them and easily destroy bonds that should have been able to endure anything. As a result, one is able to reflect on their own actions and think twice before permitting a mentality such as paranoia, stir unnecessary consequences as well as emotions. Then, Miller shifts to The Crucible, through the use of sophisticated diction such as “polemic” and “protean”, which understatedly hint at the grave seriousness of the Salem witch trials in that book, similar to the anti-communist trials in the U.S without being too obvious. These words provide a euphemism for the reader and provide them with a moment to take in the cruel reality of the paranoia of the 1950’s.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The writer includes this in order to appeal to pathos. This outpouring of emotion from Proctor during this argument conveys a passionate and emotional tone. Through the use of rhetorical devices, Miller writes his play about unjustified oppression in response to the “Red Scare” taking place in the 1950s. Miller identified the Salem Witch trials as a parallel to the attacks of his time. He hoped that by presenting the past to the American people, the future would not continue to repeat…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In manipulating the character of John Proctor, the playwright shows that nobody is free from the mob. He made Proctor a community figure, one of the “most respected” (Polster). Proctor, who was accused solely based on the ulterior motives of Abigail, stood up to the authority attempting to prove the situation false. As the protagonist, John Proctor is viewed as a good person who has made mistakes. Miller utilized this perception making Proctor’s fatal decision have an even greater impact.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.” Throughout his career, famed German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche criticized what he saw as the degression of human society through conformity. It is not necessarily a negative trait, but like a virus it remains dormant until a sickness exposes the host.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A crucial theme Arthur Miller discusses in his play, The Crucible, is repression of individual freedom. While John Proctor represents individuality, the Puritan theocracy symbolizes the repressiveness of a body of government. The most prominent representation of individuality in Miller’s play is John Proctor. Proctor’s idiosyncratic mind within Salem is not apparent to the reader until he stops agreeing with the courts and his peers.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, is based on the 1692 Salem witch trials and explores the changing power relationships between the characters. To a certain extent, the play explores the idea of characters who were previously powerless, becoming empowered as a result of the trials, however, two more prevalent themes associated with this power related theme were characters losing and abusing power. Abigail and the other young girls who she drags into her story are temporarily empowered throughout the duration of the trials. The idea of loss of power, however, is carried out to a greater degree through the characters of Mr Proctor and others who were accused of witchcraft. Along with this gain in power and loss of power, abuse of power is explored…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can a person with strong Puritan values make mistakes, but still be capable of exhibiting their core values in a good manor? In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible John Proctor makes the regretful mistake of committing adultery. He and Abigail Williams have a romantic history together and his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, is aware of John’s mistakes. As the plot develops, readers see that John still tries to stay true to his puritan beliefs. By the end of the play, John must decide if he should confess to the court to spare his life, or stay silent and be hung.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In seventeenth century Salem, Massachusetts, the concept of a theocracy ran the community. Salem’s interpretation of a theocracy was to Combine [the] state and religious power whose function was to keep the community together, and to prevent any kind of disunity that might open it to destruction by material or ideological enemies (Miller 7). The Puritans goal of the theocracy was to “keep the community together and prevent any kind of disunity”, but on the other hand, the theocracy did the complete opposite.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This scene represents a role reversal in that Proctor’s sin which opened the play becomes his opportunity for righteousness and a sense of redemption as he confesses in an attempt a moral truthfulness. However, Proctor’s expression of morality in the form of truthfulness are quickly turned against him as he is branded a liar and accused of witchcraft by the court. At this moment, the court which has symbolized morality and John Proctor which has symbolized immorality as a result of his sin of adultery, reverse their roles and Proctor is destroyed by his actions of  honesty. This role reversal further supports that assertion that The Crucible is a play devoted to morality.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, as the story continues Proctor evolves from a lying, immoral, unhappy man to a person of true courage and character that fights for what is right and strives to fix his mistakes. “My wife will not die for me! … That goodness will not die for me!” (Miller 76). As time goes on, Proctor sees the goodness that is in Elizabeth and the mercy she gave him in forgiving him for adultery.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays