Confidence In Congress

Great Essays
Review Figure 6.1, "Confidence in Congress." Why do you believe Congress receives such a low confidence rating?
Based solely on Table 6.1, even with no further information one could assume based on the facts depicted in the table that the overall can be based on the public being closed-off so to speak.

Firstly, the fact of the matter is that the people believe more in things they see the outcome from, and very few have any ties to congress anyways. The military is undoubtedly at the top of the charts; this is understandable because many know service-members, and their successes and dedication can be verified through media and their personal stories. Even those that may not support the political side of wars, most due support that the members
…show more content…
Do you believe the President 's foreign policy powers should be dominant and he should have exclusive control over foreign relations or do you believe Congress should play more of a role in these affairs?
This question can be approached in many ways, no matter the angle of approach it is honestly the best way to have it. I understand there may be misused in some people’s opinions, but the truth remains that certain things are unavoidable. The rationality is every so often even someone in this position may not be agreed with, but overall it is best that the public does not know all and that the President is in the power position in this instance. Some may not agree, but many Presidents have made great decisions and allies in these sorts of relations.
In certain instances, I am sure there may have been a degree of secrecy, which only came to light after it turned out positively. If things did not go quite as planned,
I am sure our Presidential powers that were in the office ensured no issues resulted.
If all relations on operations of the government and foreign relations had more individuals that were aware of their occurrence, some may not agree with certain aspects or secrets may be revealed that could place lives in jeopardy. The
…show more content…
I personally believe the President should have full reign, if the President cannot be trusted in such a manner then they should never be elected or they should be impeached. I have certain issues and opinions on governmental policies myself, but the truth is that the things that occur behind the scenes should reflect what the people would want or to protect the national security. The reality is the President should have the ultimate power in certain aspects, like relations and even war in my opinion. Overall, I would like to elaborate that the President should have to have more requirements to be in office; like to run the military he should have at a minimum served in the military or to lead politics he should have a certain background in politics. People worry more on opinions than a background, and this is in my opinion why the government has issues with Presidents not protecting the interests of the people.
The synopsis is Presidents should represent us, they should be stringently tested, but once they are in office they may be impeached; but they should be able to run the nation and do it unattested. The factors of what a President should be and the testing of his integrity and honor should come far before he reaches

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The president is the Head of State, so he should be powerful to make the state strong and economic well-being. The citizens voted for the President who they trust , so the President must work hard in able to worthy it. However, the President 's decision need to be ratify by the Congress in order to do it. “While the members of Congress talk and negotiate, the president can decide and act.” (348). He need to show that he can work with Congress well, because the good leader is not demanding everything that he want, but he need to serve everyone 's demand.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The system of checks and balances helps to protect the best interest of the people and the United States as a whole. The answer to help keep our government from the corruption of power is to have a system of Checks and Balances. Without the system of checks and balances America runs the risk of the government becoming too powerful, and put the country at risk in many ways, from war to another country or tyrant taking America by force. It is true that power is a very dangerous thing, the system of checks and balances is needed, there needs to be a watchful eye on all branches of government. I believe the system of checks and balances provides a sense of comfort among the people of the United…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison brought many valid points into the equation. Factions need to be regulated by the government. A point that I find very important is that Madison stated that we cannot remove the causes of factions because differing opinions will always occur.2 This is very true, but Madison also brought up another point and that is: not everyone’s prayers can be answered. If every faction achieved their goal, there would be nothing but utter chaos. It is the government’s job to keep policies in action that support the public as a whole, rather than meet the needs of the few.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Greed Analysis

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Governments are always existing with some sort of hierarchical power, as Huntington insists. The nature of bureaucratic government is a counter to the American Creed. As Huntington states, “The Government can never, however, reflect those principles perfectly (American Creed), and is therefore illegitimate to the extent to which people take seriously the principles of the American Creed.” One thing that really strikes me and leaves an imprint in my head is when we enter these times of “Creedal Passion”, the citizens of society usually implement a coping mechanism of some sort like moralism to try and bring the two sides of the gap closer together. If this is the case, and the sides become closer, how much do they actually fluctuate? Does it actually get dangerously close to the gap becoming closed, or do we just think we are doing something helpful and the government plays it off but is still being secretive in reality?…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Government In Balance

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Executive authority typically falls in the hands of our nation’s leader, the president. That being said our constitution explains the responsibilities our president has to face. For example; the executive authority has to be sure the laws are carefully executed, this also give the Congress a chance to set some laws. A large piece of our government relies on our upper power, because this is such a huge piece to the puzzle there are still a few rules that the president and congress have to follow. For instance, if one feels our leader is not doing an appropriate job or has committed treason it is possible to impeach our upper power.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    They didn’t want their smaller populations to limit their voice in politics. The large states, the ones who these papers mainly appeal to, are, according to Federalist 62, “not less solicitous to guard, by every possible expedient, against an improper consolidation of the States into one simple republic”, meaning that the large states are just as anxious and determined as small States to guard against a potential relapse to the system that they were trying so hard to fix. Possibly the most important aspect of the Senate derives from this aspect of the Constitution: the fact that “(n)o law or resolution can now be passed without the concurrence, first, or a majority of the people, and then, of a majority of the states. With this system in place, people in large states and small states alike can feel safe from the fear of lack of liberties because of the system in place to ensure that nothing gets done without the synonymous approval between the people and the states. The House of Representatives represents the wants of the people because they are elected by the people themselves, while the Senate is to represent the wants of the states because of the appointments by state…

    • 1822 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And if two thirds are swayed, there is such a minor chance that the last third will be able to stand strong and not be taken advantage of and used for a purpose that is far from what they were designed to be and from what the Constitution of the United States says they are to be. This does happen too, my example is all too real and happens all too often. Americans, we must speak truth to power. This is potentially the only way we can turn this around for ourselves. If our government is blinded by corruption, we must make it blatantly obvious to them that we will not stand to be ruled in this ineffective manner any longer.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Roosevelt understood the reality, that American security was now tied to other countries, as they fought for the freedom and the right to democracy (Roosevelt). Should democracy continue to flounder across the world, Roosevelt was confident that in due time, the United States would be under attack as well (Roosevelt). In his speech, he stated that the United States did not compare in size or resources, so it was imperative that the U.S. provided assistance to foreign countries, because should they all fall, the United States risked falling as well (Roosevelt). This was a terrifying thought for the citizens of the United States, and put into perspective the necessity that the United States become more engaged in the international world. Roosevelt encouraged that the United States use the four human freedoms as a guiding principle for what they wanted to see established…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State governments will make it too difficult to maintain the national government, they are bias, and Americans should have a firm union in this new nation. Overall, he was completely against state governments. He favored a strong federal government made of many wealthy members. Moreover, Hamilton held a loose interpretation of the Constitution. He even supported sometimes restrictions on speech and press under certain circumstances.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays