Comparision Of The Ideas Of Durkheim And Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Two key concepts that greatly contrast one another includes Marx’s conflictual yet realistic key concept on exploitation, closely tied to Durkheim’s naïve functionalist outlook on the industrial revolution and solidarity. Marx criticized the industrial capitalist division of labour, whereas Durkheim saw it as an opportunity for workers to express their freedom of choice and come together forming social cohesion. Originally, Marx believed “capitalism inverted the world of work and turned it against the workers thereby developing a system through which works became a means of exploitation.” (2, direct quote, pg 86). While workers only have their labour power to sell, “the fact that labour is external to the workers, i.e. does not belong to his …show more content…
(Paraphrase, pg 76 grint and nixon). However, Durkheim had a more uplifting approach towards the labour necessity and one’s choice to sell their labour power as a commodity. (pg 95, the sociology of work, paraphrase). Nevertheless, although Marx saw the division of labour as a means whereby the bourgeois class extended its control over workers, Durkheim saw the industrial side of it as a progressing feature of sophisticated societies. Durkheim regarded the pathological features of the divisions of labour as unusual forms capable of being transformed and restructured, therefore paving the way for the division of labour to recognize its true purpose in society as the very basis of truly cooperative interdependence, known as solidarity. (6, pg 50, paraphrase). Durkheim argued that industrial society actively freed people from isolation by inducing mutual dependence through the increasing division of labour” (pg 96, the soc of work, direct quote). However, as seen in Durkheim’s notion on suicide, industrial capitalism has high consequences on society such as a greater risk in mortality.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 3) In the first essay of On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche’s central concern is the slave revolt in morality. In this paper, I argue that Nietzsche does not think Marx an example of the slave revolt in morality as Nietzsche’s view of the slave class is different to Marx’s view of the proletarians as well as their differing suggestions in terms of imaginary revenge and physical revolution. To begin with, Nietzsche explains in the first essay that master morality is one associated with the noble who are “the mighty, the high-placed and the high-minded” (Nietzsche, 11).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paid Sick Leave Analysis

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chen describes how this results in the workers experiencing both physical and mental harm to themselves. Marx and Durkheim would view the role of the state differently. Marx’s theories would hold the state responsible for not caring for their workers. Durkheim would see workers that are not effective and productive as a vital part of the societal organism not functioning.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The separation between capitalist and the working class is unfair and uneven. To Marx, “If the wealth of a society is decreasing, the worker suffers most, for although the working class cannot gain as much as the property owners when society is prospering, none suffers more cruelly from its decline than the working class” (Marx, page 284, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript). He concludes that this makes a worker a slave to capitalism; his or her spirit chained to the robotic and mechanical motions of labor. He finds that these people become, “depressed, therefore, both intellectually and physically to the level of a machine, and from being a man becomes an abstract activity and a stomach, so he also becomes more and more dependent on every fluctuation in the market price, in the investment of capital and in the whims of the wealthy.” (Marx, page 285, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript).…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim believed that society functioned, while Marx views saw the opposite. Marx (1996) viewed the world as a history of class struggle (1), meaning that the world does not function due to the fact that everyone strives to obtain power, thus causing inequalities among society. To begin with, Marx believed that society could be studied through material conditions, also known as materialism (Marx, 1989, 4). The…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim were both important figures in the creation of sociology. Karl Marx created the Conflict Theory and wrote The Communist Manifesto. There are some key ideas for Marx’s theory. He argued that everything is about class conflict. The bourgeoisie, or capitalists, were the class that paid the proletariat, or workers, and often took advantage of them.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim and Marx both had their own respective theories on how society was to operate so it could continue to drive social change. Durkheim believed in the individual’s contributions to the capitalistic society played the most important role by relying on one another to do their part. On the other hand, Marx believed in a class society where the poles relied on the bourgeoisies for their labor to help create the loop of need which help to expand capitalism and help to drive society. Though both men had widely vary views on how society should operate they both relied on the same fundamentals of capitalism and how people played their role whether relying on someone to do their job or a class of people reyling on another class to provide work for…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Marx and Durkheim perceived flaws in the Capitalistic system, although, where Marx sought revolution, Durkheim proposed reform According to Durkheim, the division of labor, carrying an increasing specialization among the workforce, represented a stage in the evolution of humankind that was social as well as economic in nature According to Marx, the conflict model of society was evolutionary. Society was comprised of a moving balance of antithetical forces that generate social change by their tension and struggle. Capitalism as an economic system is irrational erecting barriers to modern science and technology’s capacity to meet human needs.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zone 3 By Emile Durkheim

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) was a French sociologist who was considered to be a radical social thinker of his time. Durkheim published a book called the De la division du travail social (The Division of Labor in Society). In this book he talked about the social change involved in the industrialization. He divided his research into three different theories; mechanical, the transition from mechanical to organic, organic. Mechanical is a more primitive form of society and organic is a more modern form.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, Marx issues the factory example which he relates to the worker being forced to do something that eventually makes them alienated. The difference between their theories lies in exploitation, one discusses the exploitation of the working class controlled by the capitalists, while Durkheim discusses exploitation due to the complexity of the society. While Durkheim focuses more on the individual who resists something based on their own lifestyle, which he refers to as an anomic situation. Karl Marx conflict in a societies as a negative aspect, something that resulted in dysfunctional individuals. Whereas Durkheim took conflict as a positive element in society, with conflict eventually comes resolution and orders change to…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Durkheim are 2 sociologists that had very different views on law, and how it should be practiced. While Marx believed that law is determined by the economy, and social inequality. Durkheim believed that law is more of a social phenomenon, and was shaped by what society deemed worth enforcing. I have to say, that both can be true in their own form, as the rich seem to be nearly invincible and untouchable in our country, which can be backed up by Marx’s theory of social inequality. But when it comes to everyday people like myself and my peers, Durkheim's theory is more applicable.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays