Emile Durkheim And Marx As The Fathers Of Sociology

Improved Essays
Many men took stride to perceive the social change happening in society. Three men had earned the title of being the Fathers of Sociology. Durkheim, Marx, and Weber both used Sociology as a tool to help explain the idea of modern developments. Durkheim and Marx are the two founders that had vesting variations of how they respectively explained the idea of the modern development. Emile Durkheim believed in the idea of social cohesion to help develop while Karl Marx believed in capitalism and division as the driving force of development. Though these two had vast differences in the way they taught development in the end they both agreed that it was based on society. Emile Durkheim born in 1858 in Epinal to a religious family it seemed like it was only destined for him to become a part of the long line of religious leaders. Though when he began his early schooling he had lost interest in the idea of religion and broke ties with his Jewish Faith all together (Jones, 1986). Then he went on to earn his degrees in Letters, which occurred in 1874, then in sciences, occurring in 1875, (Jones,1986). Emile Durkheim primary …show more content…
Durkheim and Marx both had their own respective theories on how society was to operate so it could continue to drive social change. Durkheim believed in the individual’s contributions to the capitalistic society played the most important role by relying on one another to do their part. On the other hand, Marx believed in a class society where the poles relied on the bourgeoisies for their labor to help create the loop of need which help to expand capitalism and help to drive society. Though both men had widely vary views on how society should operate they both relied on the same fundamentals of capitalism and how people played their role whether relying on someone to do their job or a class of people reyling on another class to provide work for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Functionalism construes each individual part of society and how it functions to contribute to harmony and stability of a whole society. Emile Durkheim, a French Sociologist, presented this theory of Functionalism through an analogy of a human organism, making him a principal founder of modern sociology (Carls). He related certain parts of the human body to social institutions. Conley shows how Durkheim compared each major organism to a part of society; the government to the brain, industry to the muscular system, and media to the nervous system (29). Functionalism however, has been criticized by many sociologist though, for it presents negative suggestions on social order.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emile Durkheim had a big impact on social consensus, which will be discussed more…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paid Sick Leave Analysis

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chen describes how this results in the workers experiencing both physical and mental harm to themselves. Marx and Durkheim would view the role of the state differently. Marx’s theories would hold the state responsible for not caring for their workers. Durkheim would see workers that are not effective and productive as a vital part of the societal organism not functioning.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a traditional society, Durkheim explains that people’s identity is connected to a clan or a class with few choices involved such as you might be a baker or a Lutheran. At first this lack of self-consciousness was perceived as negative, throughout rebellious times of history they fought for more freedom and to get rid of the social norms. As these norms lose their value and our society becomes less defined as it moves from a mechanical to an organic society, it is filled with a sense of loss and risks as no one is telling you how to live or behave meaning all individual failure is blamed by yourself, this creates such a mammoth issue as it is the nature of capitalism that not everyone will succeed increasing the idea of unfulfillment in people. You must choose everything yourself, what job to have, who to marry, what religion to follow, and this arguably has only worsened as society has progressed. Marx agrees that the shift from a traditional to a modern society is a…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim believed that society functioned, while Marx views saw the opposite. Marx (1996) viewed the world as a history of class struggle (1), meaning that the world does not function due to the fact that everyone strives to obtain power, thus causing inequalities among society. To begin with, Marx believed that society could be studied through material conditions, also known as materialism (Marx, 1989, 4). The…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim were both important figures in the creation of sociology. Karl Marx created the Conflict Theory and wrote The Communist Manifesto. There are some key ideas for Marx’s theory. He argued that everything is about class conflict. The bourgeoisie, or capitalists, were the class that paid the proletariat, or workers, and often took advantage of them.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this essay I chose to write about Emile Durkheim. He was born in Epinal, France on April 15, 1858. His family was long line of French Jews. Even though he did not believe in God. He started going to rabbinical school at a young age, but later he switched schools, and realized that he wanted to study religion from an agnostic point of view.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalist sociologists, such as Emile Durkheim, project a consensus theory on society. However the idea of consensus, when it comes to suicide, doesn’t fit perfectly. Durkheim addressed this within his work through a book he wrote a book called “Le suicide”. This book states that the idea of suicide being a product of individuality, meaning only individuals have power on whether they decided to commit suicide or not, is actually an illusion and that society itself has massive amounts of influence on that decision although on the other hand he did state that the act itself is an extremely personal and is solidarity action. He addressed psychological factors within his work and said that they they do have manipulation on the brain causing…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlottesville: A Durkheimian Perspective Introduction Emile Durkheim plays a pivotal role in the field of sociology. His innovative research paved the way to new theories that help us explain and understand the way society works. Durkheim is responsible for numerous contributions to the field of sociology, but is often known for his theories on collective conscience, solidarity, and anomie. Collective Conscience Collective conscience denotes the interest of the collective level of society (Emile Durkheim). Durkheim's theory on collective conscience refers to the “totality of beliefs and sentiments common to average citizens of the same society” that “forms a determinate system which has its own life” (Durkheim 38-39) or collective representations.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, the exact dynamics of the relationship between society and the economy are up to theoretical debate. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber were the first to explore these relationships, being around during the time in which they formed, in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. All three developed…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Durkheim and Marx believed that history is about the division of labor, however, their perception about the division of labor was different. Durkheim's perception of the division of labor was that it creates specialization and leads to solidarity. His assumption was that the division of labor would bring people closer together and everyone would work in harmony and get along without any disruption. He believed that specialization was a positive thing, that people should be proud of the role they play. Although each person specializes in one thing, all the workers come together and are a part of creating that one product.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Marx and Durkheim (and their concepts) share many similarities, I will argue that as a response to capitalism and the negative effects of modernity, the marked differences in their underpinning assumptions and theories, interests, and style that create Marx’s concept of alienation and Durkheim’s concept of anomie to be quite different. 204 Marx and Durkheim each had different assumptions about man and society, (Horton, 1964). Outlining just a few of these highlights the restrictions they each worked with and sets them apart as theorists. Marx’s assumes the relationships between man and society are soon to change. He also “assumes the value of freedom from constraint”, (Horton, 1964) this underpins his work, and he is thus keen to highlight the potential for the highest…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays