Comparing John Locke's Crime And Punishment

Improved Essays
John Locke argues that it is acceptable to punish people for crimes they do while they are drunk, asleep, not in their right mind. He accepts that one might not be acting as the person they identify with, but nonetheless, it is justifiable to still punish you. In this paper, I will explain why Locke is correct for believing that people should be responsible for their actions even if they are unconscious of these actions. Locke is correct because human law cannot distinguish certainly what is real. In addition, there is only one man, he is the same person in both conscious and unconscious. Locke stated, “Human laws punish both, with a justice suitable to their way of knowledge; […] cannot distinguish certainly what is real […] the ignorance

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Compare how the two philosophers Thomas Hobbs and John Locke, in an ideal state, who should have the power and how much power the ruler should have. First, we need to establish what is an ideal state. According to the two of them. Next, compare them both to one another and then try to explain their arguments. By describing their views in our own words.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Tunick’s ‘John Locke and the right to bear arms’ from the History of Political Thought will be the focus of this article review. The central argument that the article argues against is the frequently recurring view that according to Locke, “individuals have a right to bear arms for self-defence.” Tunick’s main response opposing this view is that the preservation of the society is the priority once the state of nature has been left and the focus is relocated on the collective. Although he concedes that there are instances in which it may seem that Locke allows the right to bear arms, such as where Locke clearly states that man may kill an aggressor when there is a lack of time to resort to the law, like in the state of war. He considers…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this world, the destiny of man is not controlled by some transcendental entity or any being above. Man has to work for the profit that he makes; no person should earn profit without putting in the necessary work in order to gain profit. That being said, I favor John Locke’s Entitlement Conception of Justice over John Rawls' Social (Welfare) Capitalism concept. The main principle that humans abided by during their early years of creation, was that they needed to survive. Early humans knew that in order to survive the elements and any other dangers around, a lot of work had to be put in.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are eight philosophies of punishment in the field of corrections. The first one is Retribution. Retribution is the belief that a punishment must avenge or retaliate for a harm or wrong done to another (Mays, Winfree, 2009). Retribution is one that could be currently be seen as someone being given the death penalty for being convicted of killing another person. That is really the only time, retribution could be an actual source of punishment.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Primo Levi’s memoir, If This Is a Man, Levi focuses not on just recounting the atrocities he was forced to endure and bear witness to but provides a coldly objective narrative of the acts that humans are capable of in extreme situations. These acts run the gamut from kindness exhibited with no expectations in return to callous manipulation to the detriment of others. Levi is very intentional in avoiding judging the actions of others in the camp, although he cannot always remain so objective about his own actions that must take to survive. Levi seems to be fascinated with the idea of morality and what changes a person can make to their self imposed morality in order to survive.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s description of a tragic hero is loose, having very vague boundaries. Punishment exceeding the crime is such an example with that having several meanings. Although Aristotle wrote that tragic hero’s punishments exceed the crime, Keller’s punishment exceeded the crime by effectively throwing away everything he held dear. Joe Keller was a good father, good husband, had a good paying job, and he was socially accepted. Even if his demise was caused by his own hands, he was still throwing away a perfectly good life.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a Haitian family, who has risked their lives to cross the expanse of ocean over seven hundred miles long in order to pursue a better life once they reach the shores of Florida. They desire refugee status and one day, citizenship. Upon reaching the end of their perilous journey, they are allowed to stay in the United States, but are immediately issued fines that they cannot possibly afford to pay, simply for indecent exposure and disturbing the peace. Though most people would consider this to be an undesirable outcome, in his work “Second Treatise of Government” published in 1689, John Locke suggests that in order to enjoy the advantages one receives from living under a government’s control, one must consent to the laws of that government. In this paper I shall discuss Locke’s idea of tacit consent, and consider its weaknesses as well as possible strengths if one were examine Locke’s “tacit consent” with a fairly generous interpretation of his intended meaning; Locke’s argument will then be compared to the views of the twentieth century philosophers Martin Luther King Jr and Martha Nussbaum.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two scientists had two contradictory theories about when people are peaceful, and when they are aggressive. One scientist’s name is Locke, and he believes that Man in our natural state are peaceful, and that society made people aggressive and hostile. The other scientist Hobbes thinks that before society Man was hostile and not honest, but because of society Man has become peaceful and cooperative. I argue that society caused the aggression that we see, and that before society Man was peaceful. I have a few examples to provide evidence for my decision.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes wanted an absolute monarchy, he believed that people were wicked, selfish, and cruel and that they would act on behalf of their best interests, basically that the humans only think in our self’s, “Every man for every man” Hobbes said. But in the other side we have John Locke that he basically wanted a democracy, he said that since we were born we have certain inalienable rights, that are: life, liberty and the right to own property, he also believed that the people were by nature good and that they could be trusted to govern themselves. Humans constantly need rules, laws and consequences, without them is very easy that people can do what they want. Without the laws the families wouldn’t act like a family there would not be fraternity…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke They agree on the state of nature for the state of mankind before goverment. When they have to decide on divine right or the social contract and they both chose social contract. They both agree on alot of things but they disagred on some things too.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke, the founder of modern empiricism, proposes that all ideas originate from experience, and cannot possibly be inborn. His argument is that firstly, the theory of “innate ideas” is the result of universal consent on certain notions, which does not prove them innate at all. Furthermore, there is no such consent in the first place—Locke offers the example of children, who do not know certain concepts until they are educated. Additionally, if reasoning activates these ideas in us, it proves that they are not innate, as innate ideas do not need to be taught. Instead, Locke advocates that experience is the sole producer of our ideas.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke born on August 29, 1632, was an English philosopher who is well known for his theory of mind. In Chapter XXVII: Identity and Diversity, John Locke begins by saying that we only have ideas of three substances which are God, finite intelligence, and bodies. John Locke then goes on to state that personal identity also has to to do with the the string of consciousness and has nothing to do with remaining the same substance or matter which is either physical or mental. John Locke states, “When we consider something as existing at a given time and place and compare it with itself existing at another time, we are led to form the ideas of identity and diversity” (112).…

    • 1572 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    implement is for the parents to teach and uphold a degree of denial. Children cannot get everything they want- to maintain their authority, but also teach the value of being able to control one’s passions, parents must train their children this way to encourage reason. Locke argues that this is a virtue that parents play a large role in teaching their children- to be successful, parents cannot overindulge their children, denial must be a part of their upbringing and children must obey these concepts . While Locke acknowledges the non-rational side to individuals, he contends mastery of desires it vital to the objective of moral education. According to Locke, “Children should be used to submit their Desires, and go without their Longings, even…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays