That “every man has a property in his own person” is a widely accepted premise of John Locke’s property argument. The limits of that premise were on trial in Moore v. Regents of the University of California, in which John Moore sued the University of California (“UC”) after its doctors, under the guise of treating him for hairy-cell leukemia, collected Moore’s cells, patented a cell line from those cells, and earned hundreds of thousands of dollars by doing so. In the suit, Moore claimed, inter alia, “that he continued to own his cells following their removal from his body” and that he therefore had “a proprietary interest in each of the products that [UC] might ever create from his cells or the patented cell line.”
The key question presented…