While Cladograms and Phylograms are indeed related, I think they are different. In my opinion, Cladograms use a variety of data to group organisms. These data can include phenotypes and various observations, and the clades "imply" evolutionary relationship. Conversely, phylograms also use data to group organisms, but the type of data used is such that the groupings "infer" evolutionary relationship.
For example, suppose you have a number of plants, and you decided to "group" them. You could decide that all the flowering plants are in one group, then sub divided those into blue, red and white flowers, then tall, medium and short, and so on. Your grouping could "imply" evolutionary relationships, but you probably never would say that all the
For example, suppose you have a number of plants, and you decided to "group" them. You could decide that all the flowering plants are in one group, then sub divided those into blue, red and white flowers, then tall, medium and short, and so on. Your grouping could "imply" evolutionary relationships, but you probably never would say that all the