Compare The Ways In Which Is More Successful And Successful After The Cuban Revolution

When a change is needed, it is more beneficial to have a slow change and to work towards your goal instead of a quick or immediate change. In a revolution, a slow change is more effective because you have time to plan for all the mistakes and problems that might happen during a change in government, while with a quick change you must spend time after the revolution is complete fixing the mistakes you didn’t account for resulting in a long drawn out revolution. We see that a long revolution is more effective and successful from the Cuban revolution. Slow change is more successful then quick change because you have time to plan for mistakes and problems and have time to fix them without too much conflict but with a quick change you can’t account for these mistakes and it can cause conflict and trouble within the government resulting in a slow painful change. …show more content…
The Cuban Revolution was an armed revolt led by Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement. It was against the government and Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista. The revolt took place between 1953 and 1959. Batista was finally removed from office on January 1, 1959. He was replaced by a new government led by Castro. This government later became the current Communist Party of Cuba in October 1965. In 2008 Fidel Castro stepped down as president of Cuba, putting his brother Raul in power. During the next five years, the government gradually loosened its tight restrictions on foreign travel and began allowing some private economic activity among its citizens. The citizens of Cuba now had more freedom and rights and the government is in place now. The Cuban revolution might of took a long time but it helped create a steady and strong government for the