Compare And Contrast The Imperial Administration Of Han China And Imperial Rome

Decent Essays
The imperial administration of Han China and Imperial Rome both left behind many achievements and had an Emperor as the political leader. However, the Romans weren’t as independent in their technology, nor did the emperors rule the same way.
The Han and Roman Emperors left behind an abounding amount of new accomplishments, but it is obvious that the Hans had more creativity in their culture. The Roman Empire was influenced heavily by Greek Culture. The Greeks shaped Roman religion, buildings, art, and Romans even communicated in Greek. Romans also depended on slave labor whereas the Hans paid free peasants. This caused Rome to have economic problems once slaves started gaining freedom. Overall the Roman Empire relied on other people to build

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty were incredibly superior in this category. The few major achievements of Athens were that Athens’ archon or leader, Solon, boosted exports in wine and olive oil, bringing in more money and he also created many government reforms. In contrast, Han China was the most advanced empire in the world at their time. They created bridges, rudders for ships and made paper. This shows great imagination and creativity, not to mention, impressive building skills.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class. In Imperial Rome and Han China, the leaders used political theologies to explain and justify their rise to…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire is unique in its original and effective ideas Ancient Rome’s government set an example for future countries that used it as generations passed. Rome established a Republic, where citizens voted for The Great Roman empire also contributed a great deal of great ideas of their time and use today, such as the development of the alphabet, sewers and sanitation, the original concept of “lawyers”, and roads. The Roman Empire did invent “Aqueducts, Underfloor heating, Concrete and the Julian Calendar (which our modern calendar is based on.)” (bbc.com).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome And China Dbq Essay

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Early civilizations, formed and shaped by their rulers and people, rely on their roots. Geography, people, agriculture, and religion all had an effect on the culture of early groups. Language, derived from thousands of years of oral evolvement, distinguishes the people all over the world to this day. This wide variety of components formed two of the early civilizations, Rome and China. However, specific impacts, religion, formed from respect for a supernatural, immortal deity, and religious ideology, the process of basing religion off of politics, left colossal influences on culture.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire was one of the greatest civilizations in history, developing advancements in many important areas, like architecture and technology. Its culture was widespread, and it had a big impact on other civilizations to come. The main way Rome was able to become so advanced was being able to adapt to its geography. This allowed them to complete tasks more efficiently, and maximize the effectiveness of what they were doing.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Another reason the Roman empire was a better emperor than the Greek empire is because they let many people by citizens. In the Roman Empire all people were considered citizens unless you were a slave or your parents were either not born in certain areas or were not Roman citizens (Document A). The roman empire letting many people be citizens brought in people because you would rather go to a place where you would be a citizen then a place where you wouldn't. Many people joining the Roman empire brought in people with good ideas and people who could make good laws or could even be a good ruler. People would not want to join the greek empire if they were not going to be a citizen which limits the amount of people trying to improve the government…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rome left cultures, customs, government, politics, and religion, contributions that to this day have greatly influenced Western Civilization. The Romans have heavily influenced us with their architecture and the buildings that stand today in the Western civilization is due to the works of the Romans. We have learned so much from them by some of the work they have done. For example, the water works that have helped us out with our water such as the dams. They have also brought over their customs that we have adapted such as the rituals that we do during a funeral for a loved one, by giving them a proper…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome also had domestic repercussion, but those repercussions were different. In China, they were brief and superficial, while in Rome, the transition from a republic to an empire lasted throughout the empires reign in Europe. Both empires were extremely invested in their public works for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays