Compare And Contrast Mongolian And Roman Empires

Improved Essays
The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities The first example of the similarities between the two empires is the way they treated subjugated empires. Both the Mongols and Rome tolerated the conquered people of different empires. This allowed the empire to expand rapidly, because other empires knew that they would be allowed to freely worship and live the life they did before they were conquered. …show more content…
Because of the different army compositions, some tactics that were available to one empire were not available to the other. This is why the tactics used by each empire are extremely different. The Romans used a revolutionary battle formation called a Testudo. In a Testudo, Roman men would lock their shields on top and at the side of their regiment, almost like a tortoises shell. This shell was used to block incoming fire and gave the Roman men an extremely safe way to advance on the battle field. This tactic was especially effective when besieging walled cities. The Mongols fought battles in a completely different way. The Mongolian men would encircle the enemy on horseback and pelt the enemies using their bow and arrows. After the enemy army was loosened up enough the Mongols would charge right into them, killing the rest. This was a major difference between the two societies. In conclusion, Rome and the Mongols were both very similar and different in many different ways. These societies both prospered by using incredibly advanced tactics and a massive army, but each society lived in different ways. These two societies were able to accomplish great things in similar ways, but had a completely different and diverse

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Military Tactics

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They would be used to create more catapults. When attacking a kingdom, that kingdom’s main advantage was being protected by walls around the city. The Mongols started out by conquering Central Asia, primarily the Khwarazmian dynasty. Kingdoms in Central Asia built elaborate walls around their cities giving them the upper hand in defense. Since the Mongols primarily focused on using catapults instead of regular soldiers when sieging a city, the Khwarazmians’ only advantage was eliminated.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols ruthlessness with the mix of religious liberty was a key aspect that allowed for the Mongols to conquer and give them the ability to keep the masses content. This also allowed for the masses to accept the Khan as the singular leader and authoritative leader that he was and allowed for the Khan`s ego to be…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    because they were skilled at capturing territory, they had a government in place that could keep up with the huge empire that they obtained, and the location of the Mongolian Empire allowed trade to flourish. The Mongols had many military weapons like the catapult and the ballista that allowed them to conquer many territories, along with tactics that allowed them to be able to use these very destructive weapons. Perhaps the most impressive thing about the Mongolian Empire was the way they ran an Empire, although the size of the Empire was huge the Mongols kept up with it for a very long time. The government that they put in place allowed for the Empire to be run efficiently because multiple people were governing over small territories under the rule of the Emperor. Along with a great army and a good government the Mongols had a fantastic location to have an Empire.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongols created the largest empire in all of history. The land they had conquered is more than two times that of the next greatest conqueror, Alexander the Great. But unlike Alexander, who is often remembered as a hero, the legacy of the Mongols is one of brutality and barbarism. But in truth, these so-called “barbarians” were, in fact, not very barbaric at all. Recent discoveries challenged the long-accepted statement of Mongols being savage brutes, suggesting that they were perhaps wrongly labelled; the facts about them were twisted and lost to history.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negatives Of Mongols

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also, the Mongols were extremely skilled with siege warfare and were able to besiege cities quickly and effectively. They introduced more effective trebuchets (catapults that used counterweights) to fire stones accurately up to 500 meters and influenced European designs in the high middle ages until the gunpowder era in Europe. Finally, the Mongols were masters at physiological warfare. Their varying treatment of the conquered people instilled fear…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Leadership

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His appearance on the battlefield alone inspired soldiers on numerous occasions, the most famous being the Battle of Sabis. The Nervii launched a surprise attack on the Roman troops and outnumbered them sixty thousand men to forty thousand. Although the Romans fought passably against them, it was undeniable they were losing. This didn’t faze Caesar, as he quickly grabbed his weapons and joined the fight in the front lines. His mere presence inspired soldiers to fight with more zeal and strength.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire and the Hans Empire’s military and government systems were incredibly different in the sense of organization. The Roman Empire fought differently than the Hans and they approached war with more organized and well thought out tactics. The Hans military tactics went a different approach to warfare. The Hans’ military tactics were strategic through the deception. They defeated other empires by using their military tactics against them.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman and Han Empire’s When we take a look back at all the great empires that ruled throughout history, seldom does someone go too long without making reference to either the Han Empire or the Roman Empire. Both of these empires shared a lot in common and both set a precedent for great leadership and imperial dominance throughout history. However, while these empires had a great deal of similarities, they were also separated by several outstanding differences. Although, with great distance in between the two Empire’s and the lack of communication to hear or learn about one another tactics, it is surprising to see how similar their methods became. Both Empire’s looked at land as a big dollar sign and a way to expand their Empire and strengthen…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By using speed, logistics, intelligence, and communications on the battlefield, he was able to out maneuver King Darius’s army. His corps of engineers were also well versed in set battles (where both sides decide on the place and time of a battle) and siege warfare (surrounding a city, and blockading it). The speed and improvisation of Alexander were unknown by any general up until that time. With Asia Minor lost to Alexander, Darius III attempted to negotiate with him, but to no avail. Alexander wanted Darius III to surrender to him, and nothing else would be sufficient.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Military Tactics

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I don’t mean that in a literal term, the roman military would surround an encampment or city so no resources could make their way in and force surrender. While many soldiers kept guard around the enemy’s location, others would start building a wall around the area where the enemy was located. The Romans made sure to build the wall far enough away so any enemy archers wouldn’t pick them off. The goal of the wall was to enclose the enemies and force surrender. Once the wall was finished they would put catapults, ballista’s and many other weapons to rain down projectiles on the enemies.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays