Commonwealth V. Gilson Case Summary

Decent Essays
. The court ruled that the warrantless search of the dormitory room by the campus police violated the defendant's constitutional rights and that all evidence obtained as a result of the search should be suppressed in the case Commonwealth v. Eric W. Neilson, 423 Mass 75 (1996). College officials searched the room because they had reason to believe that there was an animal inside the room, which is against school policies. When they got in the room they proceeded to look in the closet; there they found a marijuana plant. The college officials immediately called the police and when they arrived they took pictures of the plant for evidence, and then with the help of the college officials, removed it from the room. At no time did the police seek,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case of the United States v. Gordon, Tremain R. Gordon and Emily Jones, his girlfriend coconspired in robbing a bank in which Ms. Jones was employed with. Gordon enlisted the help of friends, Eric Carter and Ramon Mitchell in being part of the robbery because Mrs. Jones’ employees knew her boyfriend Mr. Gordon. During the robbery, Mitchell handed a note demanding money to the teller, Ms. Jones and she went along with the plan. Eventually, Ms. Jones informed Aubrie Miller, a coworker at the bank of the robbery and Aubrie Miller then relayed the message of staying calm and giving the assailants whatever they demanded. After their plan had been discovered by law enforcement, the assailants were indicted in which Jones, Carter and Mitchell…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the court case Garrity Vs New Jersey the officer on trial was made to incriminate himself by being forced to testify. This officer was later convicted on his testimony. The supreme court hailed that the officers answers could not be used against him in his criminal trial because the fifth amendment forbid a coerced confession. Today the Garrity rule states if an officer is compelled to provide self incriminating statements information or statements such statements can not be used in a criminal proceeding, but officers can be disciplined or discharged.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    State V. Rallia The following is the facts, legal research and charge recommendation for case against twenty-five year old, Bill Rallia. The following charges are recommended: Conspiracy for attempted armed robbery, carrying of a concealed weapon, attempt of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, and second degree murder. In the case against Thomas the following charges are recommended: unlawful possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to sell, maintaining a drug property and failure to intervene. These charges are recommended based off the fact of the case and Florida law.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was not any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the search of the cell phone. The contents of the bag, including a vaseline jar and a sandwich wrapper, do not give reasonable grounds for the search of the phone. If Sanders and Turpin found no marijuana on L.O.L. and sent him back to class, what was the purpose of keeping his cell phone as there was no reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Similarly in the case G.C. v. Owensboro Public Schools (2013), the Sixth circuit had ruled against the school’s search of the student’s cell phone.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The struggle between the Native Americans and the Americans was extremely relevant and volatile during the 1800’s. The struggle escalated in 1830 when Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act (“Worcester”). As a result, new issues arose on a fight that had been around for centuries between the Native Americans and the Americans. One major collateral outcome of this act is the Supreme Court case, Worcester vs. Georgia. This case and the results of it turned out to be a major step forward for the Native Americans fighting for their rights and freedom during this time.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third warrantless search the police did was in Weeks room and they found more evidence. After the three warrantless Weeks decided to file a suit to not use the evidence they illegally…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police officers found evidence of drug use in the trash. They then used this evidence to obtain a search warrant, a legal document permitting the searching of property by police or the government, to search Mr. Greenwood's home. Once inside they found evidence of drug use and trafficking.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case State v. Marley (1847), a slave by the name of Marley had assaulted a white man physically and was very rude and disrespectful to him as well. Marley was tried in County Court of New Hanover and was found guilty of assault and battery and insolence against a white man. He was then sentenced to be whipped twenty-five times. After receiving the punishment, Marley’s master appealed to the Court of Pleas for the same convictions. The court found Marley guilty and sentenced him to the same punishment the County Court gave him, twenty-five stripes.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    T. L. O. Case Essay

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    T.L.O. may have had illegal items in her possession, but the search conducted by the school was unlawful, unreasonable, and violated two Amendments in the Constitution of the United States of America. T.L.O. suffered many charges pressed against her in the lower level courts, so she has now been brought to The Supreme Court’s attention. T.L.O. was first discovered smoking in a school lavatory along with an acquaintance by a teacher. Her accomplice admitted to smoking but T.L.O. denied it. She was brought…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom case presented to the ECHR back in September of 1981, mothers of the Campbell and Cosans family fought for their philosophical beliefs on how their children should and should not be disciplined. The case brought up very important stances on the right of a teacher enforce corporal punishment, and the right of a student being denied education because he or she did not want to receive corporal punishment. The claims began from two different schools in Scotland. The Campbell family had their young son enrolled in the St Mathews Roman Catholic Primary School located in Bishopbriggs.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Justice Gaudron decided without reference to privity of contract, she held that because Trident had accepted an agreement of consideration for a promise to benefit the third party, it was under an obligation to McNiece to fulfill that promise and that McNiece had a right to bring an action to secure the benefit of that promise. Justice Toohey held that where there is a public liability indemnity policy issued within a situation where parties have shown an intention for third parties to indemnified, the third party whom ordered their affairs in reasonable reliance were indemnified under the policy and were entitled to sue on the policy. The minority of the court, who were Brennan, Deane and Dawson JJ rejected the abolition of the doctrine of…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays