Common Pleas Case Study

Decent Essays
Show More
1. The probability of cases being appealed and reversed in the three different courts.
The probability of cases being appealed for the Common Pleas court is 0401, for Domestic Relations Court it is 00348 and Municipal court it is 00461, the probability of cases being reversed in each court are for the Common Pleas court it is 00453, Domestic Relations Court it is 00056 and Municipal Court the probability is 00461. Appeals are likely to occur in the Common Pleas Court; however there is one in every twenty five cases that are appealed and the probability of an appeal within the three courts is.0129
2. The probability of a case being appealed for each judge.
For each Judge the probability of a case being appealed are Judge Karla Grady, Judge Ralph Winkler and Judge Ronald Panioto because overall these Judges have the lowest probability in all three courts. …show more content…
Karla Grady and Deidra Hair of The Municipal court are the best when it comes to probability of reversal followed by Thomas Nurre of The Common Pleas court Ronald Panioto of The Domestic

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Case Study Of The Contract Between Palermos And Colorado Carpet
    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Case Study Of The Contract Between Palermos And Colorado Carpet

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Cousin Vinny Ethics
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cousin Vinny Ethics

    Lawyers, witnesses, the judge, and the bailiff all make up the cast seen in an average trial. In My…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ambiguity Of Scots Law Essay
    • 1066 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ambiguity Of Scots Law Essay

    here are two recognised standards of proof in Scots law. The first is beyond reasonable doubt, which is usually in criminal cases. The second is on the balance of probabilities which arises mostly in the civil context. This would suggest that the law on the standard of proof is straightforward. However ambiguity arises in the argument that there is or that there should be a third standard.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Of Complaint For The Bunion Case
    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case Study Of Complaint For The Bunion Case

    I went to go visit Judge Lippitt, she was in her chambers. I went to go ask her some questions, also about a few verdicts. The verdict for the bunion case of the doctor who was being sued for malpractice because the plaintiff claimed he took out too much bone was given to the plaintiff. The plaintiff did get less than they asked for, they wanted 250,000 ended up getting 150,000 plus 15,000 for future surgeries. I think the jury may have given her less because of the lack of demonstration of the impact the surgery results on her life.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Bluebook Fifth Edition: California Style Manual 4th Edition
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Bluebook Fifth Edition: California Style Manual 4th Edition

    GENERAL CITATION RULES (continued) RULE BLUEBOOK 20th edition ALWD 5th edition California Style Manual 4th edition ORDER OF CITATIONS/ AUTHORITIES BB B1.2 and R1.4 ALWD 36 CSM 1:5 Federal appellate courts: Treat as one court, and put in reverse chronological order (i.e. most recent first). Federal district courts: Treat as one court, and put in reverse chronological order. Federal appellate courts: First order by court (1st, 2d, etc.), then reverse chronological order. Federal district courts: First order alphabetically, then in reverse chronological order. Generally in reverse chronological order, but also in order of relevance to your case.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Georgia Court System Research Paper
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Georgia Court System Research Paper

    The Georgia court system consists of a Municipal Court, Magistrate Court, Probate Court, Juvenile Court, State Court, Superior Court, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The Municipal Court has three hundred and seventy courts with three hundred and fifty two active Judges. The Municipal Court handles traffic offenses, local ordinance violations, conduct preliminary hearings, issue warrants, and they may handle misdemeanor shoplifting and possession of marijuana cases. The Judges in the Municipal Court can be appointed by the mayor or elected.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Supreme Court Research Paper
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Texas Supreme Court Research Paper

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Supreme Court Decisions And The Attitudinal Model
    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme Court Decisions And The Attitudinal Model

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Local Trial Courts In Texas
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Local Trial Courts In Texas

    They work with minor civil cases and criminal offences where the maximum sum of compensation is less than $10,000. Courts can issue same types of warrants as Municipal Courts and serve as the coroner, if there is no other medical examiner. Small Claims Courts give only monetary compensations – they can not make person to start or stop doing something. Cases from both types of institutions are appealed by State Intermediate Appellate Courts that have intermediate appellate jurisdiction. Defendants have rights to appeal their convictions, if they have records of the trial and the motion for a new trial was made before the 10th day after judgment.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Justices
    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Justices

    I will be discussing how a person can predict the decisions of the justices on the Supreme Court based on whether they are conservative or liberal leaning justices. Then, where does that leave the idea the that no case is prejudged? If a person can predict the decisions of the justices on the Supreme Court based on the conservative or liberal leanings of the Supreme Court justices, where does that leave the idea that no case is prejudged? The way I believe that a person predicts the decision of the justices on the Supreme Court is in part on how they interpret the constitution (Pollack, 2017).…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Isaac C. Parker: The Legend Of The Hanging Judge
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Isaac C. Parker: The Legend Of The Hanging Judge

    Legend of the “Hanging Judge” While in search of a piece of Arkansas history I came across a familiar name when research brought me to Judge Isaac Parker. Remembered today as the “Hanging Judge”, Isaac C. Parker had an impressive thirty-five year career in public service. He became a frontier attorney, later served as a city attorney, state judge, a two year term representative to Congress, and his most notable legacy as a federal district judge in Fort Smith, Arkansas for twenty-one years. Isaac Charles Parker was born October 15, 1838 to Joseph and Jane Parker.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay
    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    When the defense wrote to the court, they backed Judge Thayer” (Costly). The law in the state of Massachusetts was that any appeal for a new trial had to be approved by the judge that originally oversaw the first trial. Judge Thayer was either too stubborn to look bad by overturning his verdict, or too mean to…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Dworkin On Judicial Discretion In Hard Cases
    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Dworkin On Judicial Discretion In Hard Cases

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Process Analysis
    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Criminal Justice Process Analysis

    The criminal justice system is made of rules that are in place to not only protect the victim and the convicted, but also the prosecution and the defense attorneys. The system is governed by these guidelines from the time a police officer suspects a crime all the way to the day the offender is released from prison. The steps for an individual to be convicted of a crime must start with the arrest, and fallow the process in order to the pre-trial, trial, and appeals. There are different guidelines that apply to state and federal cases. To effectively understand the criminal justice process a person must start at the bottom and follow the progression of the charge.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Discretion
    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Discretion

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings