Classic Argument Of Fate Vs. Free Will In Literature

The classic argument of Fate v Free Will in life and in literature has been around for centuries. Everyone debates it at least once. It has always baffled mankind whether there is a fate that cannot be altered or if it is what you make of it. It has been between those that believe that their every move has been pre-destined and those that believe that you make your own decisions without it being planned for them. The thought that everything is set in stone gives comforting feelings for some, while making others cringe in disgust or fear. It is all up to the person in question. The story of Oedipus is a fine example of a self-fulfilling prophecy and this argument is at the center. Some say it was fate that it happened, while others thought that it was free will that caused the events to happen. It was fate that caused Oedipus to act as he did and it was fate that made the events happen. But Free Will was shown as well in how they approached the problem at the time. …show more content…
The idea of someone knowing the future is fascinating and enticing to a large amount of people. The idea that they could change the future by knowing it encouraged people to try it. Some found it as fact, while others saw them as frauds. They are said to know everything and are wise to the fate of people. Fate is known by these people and their word is usually followed. A example of a famous Oracle was the Oracle of Delphi who belonged to the God Apollo. They were said to get their visions from the Fates, a Deity or as in Ancient Greece from Apollo. The entire play of Oedipus Rex was based off a single prophecy told by an Oracle. The events played out and followed the prophecy to the word, thus showing Fate. But an argument can be made for Free Will being a major part in the play as well, showing the argument Fate v Free