Civil War: The Role Of Imperialism In The United States

Improved Essays
In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s America seemed to find itself in the center of conflict often. America had just recently gotten out of a Civil War and was experiencing many problems. At this time there were a lot of different beliefs in the country on how it should be run and what to do with the growing country. Many of the issues in the country surrounded war and how and when America should enter wars. War should be considered a viable option when another country or foreign force attacks first, or when they are believed to be in danger because of information intercepted.

There have been many times in history when a country has been attacked by another without the first country having prompted the attack. One of the best examples of this
…show more content…
Imperialism is when a country extends its political, economic, social beliefs, and power in other countries. This is done by use of military, money, or in a variety of other ways. America has been known to do this in the past, in Venezuela, Hawaii, and also in Panama. Cohen Morgenthau stated “Imperialism is simply a manifestation of the balance of power and is the process by which nations try to achieve a favorable change in the status quo.” Understandably many countries may feel threatened when other countries “ try to achieve a favorable change in the status quo,” which might not always be favorable to everyone. Similarly to Imperialism, Militarism can also be used as a sort of intimidation tactic. Militarism can frighten surrounding countries. When one country starts to build up a large military it can cause other countries to believe that something is about to happen or cause them to then see a need to also build up their military. Countries then can see a need to form new alliances to protect themselves. For instance one example of an alliance system was the alliance system in World War One which was one of the main causes of world war one, it created two sides and highlighted how different they were. Many times throughout history countries have gone to war only for the fact that they were part of an alliance that was attacked. Many people feel nationalism in their …show more content…
In many cases where countries have gone to war one or more of the countries involved have felt threatened, were threatened, or had reason to believe they might be threatened. When citizens of countries start to threaten other countries citizens with their beliefs or ideas then military action should become an option. There is and will always be room for debate as to when another country can go to war and is justified in their action. However when prompted or threatened a country has the right to use military action against

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.” – General William Sherman Throughout the expansive, harrowing history of war, the surveillance and manipulation upon the enemy undoubtedly contributes in who becomes the victor.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although everything that is happening in the imperialism sounds familiar to other empires that have occurred in the past such as colonialism, it is also different. Imperialism wants political or economic control over regions while in colonialism one nation controls over the other. For example the settlement of North America. An example of imperialism is the “scramble for Africa”. The “scramble for Africa” was part of the many things that the imperialism…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Imperialism In Africa

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Imperialism is the practice of expanding beyond a country’s natural borders for the purpose of military expansion, political gain, raw materials, and nationalism. However, not everyone agreed with the imperialistic views. There were those who believed it had proper ideals, while others believed it promoted the wrong principles of democracy. Imperialism especially affected the people of Africa, India, and Korea. Economic gain is most often related as an increase in jobs.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Anti-Imperialist League argued that they were very good people and didn't prey on weak but they said that leaving would cause conflict and that they would have to take action. They also say how they provide military, and many other things so why would they leave. They also saw this as making them weaker and also almost a form of treason to leave and discard them. To appose the annexation efforts they will say that it will weaken them and that it is just a cause of war and that they don't need war.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This source believes that all countries should have a right to have their own policies, also that all countries should, “pursue its own goals”, and avoid interfering with another countries policies. Throughout the countries of the world they’re many different ideas and policies on religion, race, culture, etc., that all conflict with each other in different ways. Some believe that when these countries conflict with one another there should be some kind of interference between them to fix the situation by means of compromising. Some countries think that they should interfere with others in certain situations especially when it conflicts with their beliefs. When the United States and the Soviet Union conflicted in the Cold war, them interfering…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carl Von Clausewitz

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Carl Von Clausewitz’s definition of an act of war substantiates particular state sponsored cyber-attacks as acts of war. Clausewitz’s definition requires cyber-attacks to meet three elements to elevate to the level of an act of war. Categorization of the perpetrator to determine the intent and nature of their attack is imperative in determining whether a cyber-attack meets Clausewitz’s definition. John Stone correctly advocated in “Cyber War Will Take Place!” that an act of force isn’t necessarily an act of violence when determining whether a cyber-attack is an act of war.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    David. O World War 1 During many time there was hostility, fights and disagreements that many countries and states that have disagreements and acts upon into war affecting every nation. Not just the nation but the people most of all, for they are the ones who have to lay their lives for their families and their country and most of them are being forced to fight or face consequence. Those involved should not bring others into their feud and hostility with negative consequences.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism was a proper and legitimate policy for the United States to assume at the turn of the century. The U.S. economy prospered due to the spread of imperialism. The United States had one of the top military forces in the world, making it easy to take control over other countries. Manifest Destiny also contributed to the idea of imperialism in the United States. There were many factors in place in the United States that were improved by imperialism and helped imperialism flourish.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Can there be a second Civil War in modern America? Textbooks packed with information are the backbone of history in the world. Once people become more educated in the political area, they’ll understand that a revolution in modern America can’t happen. There’s many reasons why this is true and these are my top three, educated men and women, military, and the bill of rights.…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To many people, nationalism has a negative impact on the world. There is a lot of evidence to prove that nationalism has taken a toll on many people. During the era of the French Revolution in 1789, Europe did not favour their citizens, people were treated like slaves and there was no citizenship in the Government. Many innocent people died for no reason in that time period. During World War 1 there were over 37 million military and civilian casualties.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people would agree with this perspective, the intervention of military in international affairs is justified by a country’s national interest and calculations. Alternatively, some may…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism is a school of thought that emphasized foreign policy makers to focus on mutual interests in order to promote the coexistence of all societies (Dunne & Schmidt, 2014, p. 100). However realism has undergone many renaissances to come to promote coexistence of all societies. It became institutional post World War II as world powers looked to work together under reason d’etat which according to historian Frederich Meinecke is “the fundamental principle of international conflict, the state 's first law of motion “It tells the statesman what he must do to preserve health and strength of the state (1957:1)” (Dunne, Schmidt, 2014, p.100). Realism preaches the security of all societies locally and globally.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanitarian Interventions Concept of Humanitarian Intervention Intervention means dictatorial interference by a state in the affairs of another state for the purpose of maintaining or altering the actual condition of the thing. In simple words, a state interferes in matters of another state without permission of the state. Humanitarian intervention in simple terms is intervention in a state by another when there is gross violation of human rights in that state. This evolved from the concept of that everyone had a “duty to assist people in danger”.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of New Imperialism

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imperialism is “a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force” (Google). There were many causes of new imperialism, including political, economic, religious, ideological, and exploratory forces. Economic forces deal with money and trade. Political forces deal with territory, power, expand, influence, and competition. Social forces deal with ideological, religious, and cultural values.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this anarchic world, one state might build up its military capability in order to ensure its security or to utilise its resources, but since the other states are not clear about the intentions of the state, they would regard this as a direct threat to their survival and an aggressive stance and would result in the other state increasing its military capability in competition. This leads to an increasing spiral of military and arms in order to have that offensive power other the rival state. The most valid example for this the arms race between USA and USSR during the cold war. When USA bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki with its atomic bomb in 1945, it thought that it would take the ussr atleast another 15 years or so to make the bomb considering the damage done to it during world war 2, but the usssr had realised the lag and it was able to produce its atomic bomb in 1949. This made USA feel threatened hence they moved on to developing hydrogen bombs to have an upper hand over ussr again, but in 1953 ussr was able to catch up once more.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays