Facts
There are various aspects of public administration that are often considered ridiculous by those with opposing opinions. From civil disobedience in the face of government mandates, to policy analysis, surely public policy is an intertwined and multifaceted dichotomy.
Cases in Public Policy and Administration considers civil disobedience as a higher-law approach in action. Indeed, then, civil disobedience can be interpreted as an act of rebellion against what one deems as unjust and biased laws, despite the consequences. According to Shafritz and Borick, “Many ordinary and some famous people have been subject to ridicule for doing the latter” (Shafritz and Borick, 2011, p.261). Moreover, when considering public policy respective to typologies, the interactions of everyday policymaking such as radio shows or the newspaper, it is evident that there is a vastness to the discussion of public policy in all realms.
Decision …show more content…
In theory, public policy has diverse components and one must consider the distinct classifications, or typologies, within policymaking as well as instances such as civil disobedience, when questions of ethics and social justice arise within the realm of public policy. Indeed, Enoch argues, “Some people think that law is, in a sense, autonomous, that it is already a mistake to think of the law as serving some purpose external to law and its nature. Law has, as it were, a normative logic internal to its political essence as law, and is in this way isolated – to an extent, at least – from general moral considerations” (Enoch,
There are various aspects of public administration that are often considered ridiculous by those with opposing opinions. From civil disobedience in the face of government mandates, to policy analysis, surely public policy is an intertwined and multifaceted dichotomy.
Cases in Public Policy and Administration considers civil disobedience as a higher-law approach in action. Indeed, then, civil disobedience can be interpreted as an act of rebellion against what one deems as unjust and biased laws, despite the consequences. According to Shafritz and Borick, “Many ordinary and some famous people have been subject to ridicule for doing the latter” (Shafritz and Borick, 2011, p.261). Moreover, when considering public policy respective to typologies, the interactions of everyday policymaking such as radio shows or the newspaper, it is evident that there is a vastness to the discussion of public policy in all realms.
Decision …show more content…
In theory, public policy has diverse components and one must consider the distinct classifications, or typologies, within policymaking as well as instances such as civil disobedience, when questions of ethics and social justice arise within the realm of public policy. Indeed, Enoch argues, “Some people think that law is, in a sense, autonomous, that it is already a mistake to think of the law as serving some purpose external to law and its nature. Law has, as it were, a normative logic internal to its political essence as law, and is in this way isolated – to an extent, at least – from general moral considerations” (Enoch,